Unlike your lying scumbag hide.
The guy three houses down is your neighbor.Skans » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Well, you're geographically challenged, I see. Cuba is 80 miles from the US, so yes, I might consider Cuba a neighbor. Costa Rica and El Salvador - they are not neighbors of the US. Air miles, they are about 1,100 air miles away. Russia is closer to the US than that, and I don't consider Russia our neighbor. Greenland is closer than either Costa Rica or El Salvador.
Iran is about 1,100 air miles from Israel. That's further away than Russia is to Israel.
Egypt was not dangerous before the deep state that you defend had not manipulated events to weaken that state through an op called arab spring. So, smugly note what a **** hole it is, while defending those who made it a **** hole. It's the rat thing to do.Skans » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I almost threw Egypt into that mix. But, Egypt really shouldn't have any beef with Israel. It gave Egypt all of its land back after one of the wars (some years after the war). And, Egypt likes the Gazans about as much as they like the Israelis, maybe even less. But, I was on the fence with Egypt as far as holding a grudge. Not for the reasons you mentioned, but for other reasons. Oh, and I think you should travel to Cairo (Egypt, not Illinois) and yell "HELLO MY ARABS". LOL - make sure you post it to youtube.You might survive that, but I wouldn't suggest traveling to Cairo Illinois and yell "HELLO MY ***".
![]()
Anyway, I already addressed your Iran-neighbor-Israel comment in a different post.
It was the first flag israelis waved in Gaza. And that is what you defend. You need to own your ****. You don't get to ride with the devil while protesting your love of Jesus, tranny supporter.Skans » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ LOL! F- if I know.
Oh, snap, I found it - they shipped it to the Israeli embassy in Washington DC!!!
Nice rant. But, you completely missed my point.Cannonpointer » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Egypt was not dangerous before the deep state that you defend had not manipulated events to weaken that state through an op called arab spring. So, smugly note what a **** hole it is, while defending those who made it a **** hole. It's the rat thing to do.
Real Sharia law mentality there. Mob rule semantics of our way or no way. Tyranny doesn't create peace just leaves the species in pieces daily here.Skans » 06 May 2025, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need to expect anything. I'm just telling you that IDGAF who Israel bombs in Gaza. I believe in wars of genocide. That genocide is just and right when a soverign nation is attacked by a weaker enemy.
This is the attitude I desire to facilitate in the United States. That, when Mexico and other Central American countries, or China invade our country and wage war against our citizens, that we have every right to fight back, demand what we want, and if our demands are not met, destroy our enemy. Destroy, as in genocidal eradication.
You and Cannonpointer can take your woke-war, 21st century, estrogen-peppered tears and cry for more tolerance for barbarians. That way, we will know who to put on the front line, with a bayonet in your backs and RPG's in your hands, and orders to kill the F-ing enemy. Or, die.
And you are missing mine. You stand with democracy destroyers and gender confusion enforcers.
I'm a lone wolf. Never been patched, brother.Cannonpointer » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And you are missing mine. You stand with democracy destroyers and gender confusion enforcers.
You have to own your ****, Spoon. You ride with outlaws, you hang with outlaws.
Which Roman Law, Political empire or global first church of Christianity after they kill Jesus and waited nearly 400 years to create the myth about him in a New Testament
The one that scattered all the Jews from Palestine in 70 AD. That one. Oh, and the one that they used in Carthage, its conquest of Gaul, Dacians, Druids (when was the last time you saw a real Druid?), and lots more. The Roman Empire lasted over 1000 years. I don't argue with what works.31stArrival » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Which Roman Law, Political empire or global first church of Christianity after they kill Jesus and waited nearly 400 years to create the myth about him in a New Testament
the pagan nation.Skans » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ The one that scattered all the Jews from Palestine in 70 AD. That one. Oh, and the one that they used in Carthage, its conquest of Gaul, Dacians, Druids (when was the last time you saw a real Druid?), and lots more. The Roman Empire lasted over 1000 years. I don't argue with what works.
Theory, my ***! It wasn't theory when Paulinus' Roman troops annihilated all of the Druids. Thousands of years ago, the Roman Empire was adept at "reaching out and touching someone".31stArrival » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ the pagan nation. Mythology was theory means continued into Christianity by Caesar/1st Pope Constantine.
You're an israel firster. An America-second guy.
Sure, if you say so.
Happy horse ****. The druids were suppressed and forced to romanize. The idea of killing every inhabitant of conquered lands is retarded. Or jewish. Or both.Skans » Today, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ Theory, my ***! It wasn't theory when Paulinus' Roman troops annihilated all of the Druids. Thousands of years ago, the Roman Empire was adept at "reaching out and touching someone".
Genghis Khan may have been the first to be recorded using annihilation to suppress his conquered enemies. But, the Romans made this an art and a science. Up through the end of WWII, it remained an accepted part of the philosophy of war. Then, drugs and bastard babies warped the minds boys and young men.
Is there any question? I JUST GOT THROUGH saying so.
Yes. Did you see a question?
Yes. The word "if" puts into question what follows.
If you say so [question mark intentionally omitted because its a declarative statement, not a F-ing question].Cannonpointer » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yes. The word "if" puts into question what follows.
That is its function - IF you use it.