Skans » 09 May 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Part of me is glad she's getting the same hot poker that they shoved up Trump's as, thrust deep within her big booty. On the other hand, I'm not in favor of Republicans playing stupid Democrat games with the courts. I'd rather them work on figuring out how to stop courts from being used politically.
If she did something that amounts to real jail time, then go for it. But, if all they are going to do is plea to picking up trash in a highway median - waste of time, waste of money.
So, are we now going to go around auditing everyone's financial statements and loan applications, prosecute and imprison those who are not in default but over/under stated information etc?*GHETTOBLASTER » 09 May 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ We need to make an example out of her.
She was no doubt appointed by her [[[HANDLERS]]] to prosecute Trump but that doesn't matter.
Our Judiciary must be held to an even higher standard than the general public and it's obvious that this corrupt monkey fails miserably to pass the test.
I want her (and everyone involved) prosecuted for the real crime of weaponizing the justice system to falsely prosecute an individual in an attempt to stop him from running for president. I don't know EXACTLY what crime that would be, but I am certain that they can use a whole bunch of federal laws that were used against the mafia to prosecute them for things other than murder. I want her prosecuted for crimes against Trump and our Nation, not tit-for-tat **** loan applications.*Beekeeper » 09 May 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Uh, did you EVER hear the words "NO ONE is above the law"??
From Big Tish herself even??
So in her OWN WORDS, she is NOT above the law and making FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS on a mortgage application is FRAUD and a felony CRIME!!
She's not just some random guy off the street.Skans » 09 May 2025, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ So, are we now going to go around auditing everyone's financial statements and loan applications, prosecute and imprison those who are not in default but over/under stated information etc?
Or, do you just want to prosecute her for this. Selective enforcement. Same selective **** enforcement they did against Trump.
While I completely agree that what happened to Trump and his financial statements was total F-ing ****. I'd rather pursue those who weaponized the judiciary against Trump for the genuine crimes of treason, weaponizing the justice system, conspiracy, racketeering, etc. That's different than going after someone for the same kind of **** they went after Trump for.
That's exactly the same excuse they used when going after Trump. By doing the same thing to her, we are validating what they did to Trump.*GHETTOBLASTER » 09 May 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ She's not just some random guy off the street.
She's a high ranking officer of the court system, which is a system that we must at all costs keep scrupulously clean
Skans » 09 May 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I want her (and everyone involved) prosecuted for the real crime of weaponizing the justice system to falsely prosecute an individual in an attempt to stop him from running for president. I don't know EXACTLY what crime that would be, but I am certain that they can use a whole bunch of federal laws that were used against the mafia to prosecute them for things other than murder. I want her prosecuted for crimes against Trump and our Nation, not tit-for-tat **** loan applications.
well said...Skans » 09 May 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Part of me is glad she's getting the same hot poker that they shoved up Trump's as, thrust deep within her big booty. On the other hand, I'm not in favor of Republicans playing stupid Democrat games with the courts. I'd rather them work on figuring out how to stop courts from being used politically.
If she did something that amounts to real jail time, then go for it. But, if all they are going to do is plea to picking up trash in a highway median - waste of time, waste of money.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Isn't that Letitia?SouthernFried » 09 May 2025, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ Speaking of black bitches, anyone seen that statue that was erected yesterday. Ya know, the one of the fat *** bitch. BV nods at it with his approval.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom That was a rhetorical question, correct? Of course the tax payers cover her costs since she is still an elected official. If she goes down, domino/butterfly effect expands.Buck Naked » 10 May 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ Does the state pay for her legal representation or does she?
BuckNaked » 10 May 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ Does the state pay for her legal representation or does she?