Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The Limitless Contradictions Of Republican Populism...
The Limitless Contradictions Of Republican Populism...
By Blackvegetable
Yesterday 6:48 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Yesterday 11:59 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ It’s not every day a neo-monarchist’s Substack helps shape disruptive federal policies. But Yarvin, 51, isn’t celebrating. In fact, in several recent interviews with The Washington Post, he offered a surprisingly harsh assessment of DOGE, comparing it to an orchestra of chimpanzees trying to perform Wagner. He also said the group’s attitude toward federal workers resembles that of a brash but insecure man who repels potential sexual partners.
“In the worst aspects of DOGE, there’s this aspect of the incel who gets mad at the girl who won’t sleep with him,” Yarvin said, using the term for so-called involuntary celibates. “That’s not a powerful attitude.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... usk-thiel/
Before we begin I ask that all the slack jaws in the room (and you know who you are) google "neo-monarchist".
Then take a very deep breath as it slowly dawns on you that one of the most influential voices of your movement has concluded what Master Vegetable told you months ago.
This will hurt, once it works its way through your block heads.
On the bright side, you'll be able to tell your grandchildren of the Babadook who authored your scars...
Lying **** ***.
Yesterday 12:04 pm
Wow. After all that posturing, the grand intellectual finally descends from Mount Copy/Paste to bless us with a bold, declarative “It doesn’t.”
Tell me, Grifticles—was that before or after you re-read the OP and realized you had no idea what you were arguing either?
Thanks for confirming what we already knew: Your threads are just placeholders for snark.
The argument? Still missing.
Dodge #143 has now been reclassified as a surrender.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:05 pm
You have no idea what the OP is about.Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Wow. After all that posturing, the grand intellectual finally descends from Mount Copy/Paste to bless us with a bold, declarative “It doesn’t.”
Tell me, Grifticles—was that before or after you re-read the OP and realized you had no idea what you were arguing either?
Thanks for confirming what we already knew: Your threads are just placeholders for snark.
The argument? Still missing.
Dodge #143 has now been reclassified as a surrender.
You're an idiot.
Yesterday 12:08 pm
Look! The pot and the ***!
Yesterday 12:08 pm
Yesterday 12:09 pm
Ah yes, the Grifticles Loop:
Step 1: Dodge the question
Step 2: Say “You don’t get it”
Step 3: Call everyone an idiot
Step 4: Repeat until someone gives up or dies of boredom
Spoiler alert: The forum does understand the OP.
We just also understand you—and that’s why you’re allergic to follow-up questions.
Thanks for playing. Dodge #144 logged and archived.
NARCISSISTS - THE "BROKEN RECORD"
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:13 pm
You have no idea to what OP @*HooooeyVagina was referring...Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Ah yes, the Grifticles Loop:
Step 1: Dodge the question
Step 2: Say “You don’t get it”
Step 3: Call everyone an idiot
Step 4: Repeat until someone gives up or dies of boredom
Spoiler alert: The forum does understand the OP.
We just also understand you—and that’s why you’re allergic to follow-up questions.
Thanks for playing. Dodge #144 logged and archived.
NARCISSISTS - THE "BROKEN RECORD"
You have no idea what this OP is about.
You should kill yourself.
Yesterday 12:17 pm
LOL—you're officially stuck in the Grifticles Death Spiral.We’ve reached peak Grifticles:Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You have no idea to what OP @*HooooeyVagina was referring...
You have no idea what this OP is about.
You should kill yourself.
Out of ideas, out of dodges, just endlessly looping “You don’t know what the OP is about” like a broken Roomba slamming into the same wall.
It’s okay, really.
When the OP is just a copied article with snark frosting, there’s not much to understand anyway.Just blink twice if you're ready to try an original thought.
Or keep spinning—Dodge #146 is already warming up.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:26 pm
That's not what I asked for.Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ From Feb 2017 to Feb. 2021
Private Industry Payrolls - (1,900,000)
Total Non-Farm - (2,500,000)
Federal Employees - 560,000
Tell me how many federal employees DOGE has either fired or laid off....[the actual number and not some projected number]
Yesterday 12:28 pm
You appear to labor under some delusion that your feelings matter.*GHETTOBLASTER » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That's not what I asked for.
Tell me how many federal employees DOGE has either fired or laid off....[the actual number and not some projected number]
Don't.
Yesterday 12:33 pm
He doesn't answer questions. He only demands answers to his questions. You will need to ask about 600 times before he might get around to it.
Cowards will be cowards.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:34 pm
Deflects from a question. How **** unlike you.Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You appear to labor under some delusion that your feelings matter.
Don't.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 12:36 pm
Babadook is a gay icon.Blackvegetable » Today, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ It’s not every day a neo-monarchist’s Substack helps shape disruptive federal policies. But Yarvin, 51, isn’t celebrating. In fact, in several recent interviews with The Washington Post, he offered a surprisingly harsh assessment of DOGE, comparing it to an orchestra of chimpanzees trying to perform Wagner. He also said the group’s attitude toward federal workers resembles that of a brash but insecure man who repels potential sexual partners.
“In the worst aspects of DOGE, there’s this aspect of the incel who gets mad at the girl who won’t sleep with him,” Yarvin said, using the term for so-called involuntary celibates. “That’s not a powerful attitude.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... usk-thiel/
Before we begin I ask that all the slack jaws in the room (and you know who you are) google "neo-monarchist".
Then take a very deep breath as it slowly dawns on you that one of the most influential voices of your movement has concluded what Master Vegetable told you months ago.
This will hurt, once it works its way through your block heads.
On the bright side, you'll be able to tell your grandchildren of the Babadook who authored your scars...
Is there something you're trying to tell us?
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 12:39 pm
Perhaps you should copy paste it, since you are the only one who has seen it.
We're all quite certain you DID define woman, on a different thread on a different day (in a different universe where you're a man), but we all somehow missed it.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 12:40 pm
If you own that weak **** any farther than this, we're going to start holding you responsible for his misbehaviors.Vegas » Today, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ There it is—Grifticles’ Golden Shield:
“Demonstrate your understanding of the OP.”
Translation: “I have no answer, so I’m going to quiz you on something I barely explained myself.”
Here’s the thing: we did read it. You posted someone else’s ideas, stapled on a paragraph of “everyone else is dumb,” and called it a day.
What’s missing—as usual—is you. Your actual take. Your own analysis. Something beyond YouTube links and rhetorical backhands.So here’s your gentle reminder:
The person who posts the thread is the one expected to actually defend it, not hide behind it like it’s a riot shield.
Now go ahead and dodge again—I know the script.
Dodge 142
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 12:42 pm
It also betrays a crystal clear understanding of you.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 12:43 pm
He knows what YOU are all about.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Yesterday 12:45 pm
Cannonpointer » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If you own that weak **** any farther than this, we're going to start holding you responsible for his misbehaviors.
He is too stupid to know when he is getting his *** kicked.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 1:17 pm
Blackvegetable » Today, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ It’s not every day a neo-monarchist’s Substack helps shape disruptive federal policies. But Yarvin, 51, isn’t celebrating. In fact, in several recent interviews with The Washington Post, he offered a surprisingly harsh assessment of DOGE, comparing it to an orchestra of chimpanzees trying to perform Wagner. He also said the group’s attitude toward federal workers resembles that of a brash but insecure man who repels potential sexual partners.
“In the worst aspects of DOGE, there’s this aspect of the incel who gets mad at the girl who won’t sleep with him,” Yarvin said, using the term for so-called involuntary celibates. “That’s not a powerful attitude.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... usk-thiel/
Before we begin I ask that all the slack jaws in the room (and you know who you are) google "neo-monarchist".
Then take a very deep breath as it slowly dawns on you that one of the most influential voices of your movement has concluded what Master Vegetable told you months ago.
This will hurt, once it works its way through your block heads.
On the bright side, you'll be able to tell your grandchildren of the Babadook who authored your scars...
It appears that @GHETTO BLASTER gutted your OP like a wrecking ball crashing into a typical building in Haiti.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 1:47 pm
Vegas » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It appears that @GHETTO BLASTER gutted your OP like a wrecking ball crashing into a typical building in Haiti.
It appears
To whom?
Who is online
In total there are 3748 users online :: 15 registered, 18 bots, and 3715 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, *GHETTO BLASTER, MR-7, *Beekeeper, murdock, LowIQTrash, Funny Guy, Deezer Shoove, 31st Arrival, *Huey
Bots: MicroMessenger, Not, oBot, Custo, YisouSpider, YandexBot, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, app.hypefactors.com, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot, semantic-visions.com, ADmantX, proximic, linkfluence.com