Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The Limitless Contradictions Of Republican Populism...
The Limitless Contradictions Of Republican Populism...
By Blackvegetable
9 May 2025 6:48 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
9 May 2025 11:59 am
Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ It’s not every day a neo-monarchist’s Substack helps shape disruptive federal policies. But Yarvin, 51, isn’t celebrating. In fact, in several recent interviews with The Washington Post, he offered a surprisingly harsh assessment of DOGE, comparing it to an orchestra of chimpanzees trying to perform Wagner. He also said the group’s attitude toward federal workers resembles that of a brash but insecure man who repels potential sexual partners.
“In the worst aspects of DOGE, there’s this aspect of the incel who gets mad at the girl who won’t sleep with him,” Yarvin said, using the term for so-called involuntary celibates. “That’s not a powerful attitude.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... usk-thiel/
Before we begin I ask that all the slack jaws in the room (and you know who you are) google "neo-monarchist".
Then take a very deep breath as it slowly dawns on you that one of the most influential voices of your movement has concluded what Master Vegetable told you months ago.
This will hurt, once it works its way through your block heads.
On the bright side, you'll be able to tell your grandchildren of the Babadook who authored your scars...
Lying **** ***.
9 May 2025 12:04 pm
Wow. After all that posturing, the grand intellectual finally descends from Mount Copy/Paste to bless us with a bold, declarative “It doesn’t.”
Tell me, Grifticles—was that before or after you re-read the OP and realized you had no idea what you were arguing either?
Thanks for confirming what we already knew: Your threads are just placeholders for snark.
The argument? Still missing.
Dodge #143 has now been reclassified as a surrender.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
9 May 2025 12:05 pm
You have no idea what the OP is about.Vegas » 09 May 2025, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Wow. After all that posturing, the grand intellectual finally descends from Mount Copy/Paste to bless us with a bold, declarative “It doesn’t.”
Tell me, Grifticles—was that before or after you re-read the OP and realized you had no idea what you were arguing either?
Thanks for confirming what we already knew: Your threads are just placeholders for snark.
The argument? Still missing.
Dodge #143 has now been reclassified as a surrender.
You're an idiot.
9 May 2025 12:08 pm
Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You have no idea what the OP is about.
You're an idiot.
Look! The pot and the ***!
9 May 2025 12:08 pm
9 May 2025 12:09 pm
Ah yes, the Grifticles Loop:Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You have no idea what the OP is about.
You're an idiot.
Step 1: Dodge the question
Step 2: Say “You don’t get it”
Step 3: Call everyone an idiot
Step 4: Repeat until someone gives up or dies of boredom
Spoiler alert: The forum does understand the OP.
We just also understand you—and that’s why you’re allergic to follow-up questions.
Thanks for playing. Dodge #144 logged and archived.
NARCISSISTS - THE "BROKEN RECORD"
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
9 May 2025 12:13 pm
You have no idea to what OP @*HooooeyVagina was referring...Vegas » 09 May 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Ah yes, the Grifticles Loop:
Step 1: Dodge the question
Step 2: Say “You don’t get it”
Step 3: Call everyone an idiot
Step 4: Repeat until someone gives up or dies of boredom
Spoiler alert: The forum does understand the OP.
We just also understand you—and that’s why you’re allergic to follow-up questions.
Thanks for playing. Dodge #144 logged and archived.
NARCISSISTS - THE "BROKEN RECORD"
You have no idea what this OP is about.
You should kill yourself.
9 May 2025 12:17 pm
LOL—you're officially stuck in the Grifticles Death Spiral.We’ve reached peak Grifticles:Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ You have no idea to what OP @*HooooeyVagina was referring...
You have no idea what this OP is about.
You should kill yourself.
Out of ideas, out of dodges, just endlessly looping “You don’t know what the OP is about” like a broken Roomba slamming into the same wall.
It’s okay, really.
When the OP is just a copied article with snark frosting, there’s not much to understand anyway.Just blink twice if you're ready to try an original thought.
Or keep spinning—Dodge #146 is already warming up.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
9 May 2025 12:26 pm
That's not what I asked for.Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ From Feb 2017 to Feb. 2021
Private Industry Payrolls - (1,900,000)
Total Non-Farm - (2,500,000)
Federal Employees - 560,000
Tell me how many federal employees DOGE has either fired or laid off....[the actual number and not some projected number]
9 May 2025 12:28 pm
You appear to labor under some delusion that your feelings matter.*GHETTOBLASTER » 09 May 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ That's not what I asked for.
Tell me how many federal employees DOGE has either fired or laid off....[the actual number and not some projected number]
Don't.
9 May 2025 12:33 pm
He doesn't answer questions. He only demands answers to his questions. You will need to ask about 600 times before he might get around to it.
Cowards will be cowards.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
9 May 2025 12:34 pm
Deflects from a question. How **** unlike you.Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You appear to labor under some delusion that your feelings matter.
Don't.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
9 May 2025 12:36 pm
Babadook is a gay icon.Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ It’s not every day a neo-monarchist’s Substack helps shape disruptive federal policies. But Yarvin, 51, isn’t celebrating. In fact, in several recent interviews with The Washington Post, he offered a surprisingly harsh assessment of DOGE, comparing it to an orchestra of chimpanzees trying to perform Wagner. He also said the group’s attitude toward federal workers resembles that of a brash but insecure man who repels potential sexual partners.
“In the worst aspects of DOGE, there’s this aspect of the incel who gets mad at the girl who won’t sleep with him,” Yarvin said, using the term for so-called involuntary celibates. “That’s not a powerful attitude.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... usk-thiel/
Before we begin I ask that all the slack jaws in the room (and you know who you are) google "neo-monarchist".
Then take a very deep breath as it slowly dawns on you that one of the most influential voices of your movement has concluded what Master Vegetable told you months ago.
This will hurt, once it works its way through your block heads.
On the bright side, you'll be able to tell your grandchildren of the Babadook who authored your scars...
Is there something you're trying to tell us?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 May 2025 12:39 pm
Perhaps you should copy paste it, since you are the only one who has seen it.
We're all quite certain you DID define woman, on a different thread on a different day (in a different universe where you're a man), but we all somehow missed it.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 May 2025 12:40 pm
If you own that weak **** any farther than this, we're going to start holding you responsible for his misbehaviors.Vegas » 09 May 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ There it is—Grifticles’ Golden Shield:
“Demonstrate your understanding of the OP.”
Translation: “I have no answer, so I’m going to quiz you on something I barely explained myself.”
Here’s the thing: we did read it. You posted someone else’s ideas, stapled on a paragraph of “everyone else is dumb,” and called it a day.
What’s missing—as usual—is you. Your actual take. Your own analysis. Something beyond YouTube links and rhetorical backhands.So here’s your gentle reminder:
The person who posts the thread is the one expected to actually defend it, not hide behind it like it’s a riot shield.
Now go ahead and dodge again—I know the script.
Dodge 142
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 May 2025 12:42 pm
It also betrays a crystal clear understanding of you.Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Your "question" betrays no understanding of the OP..
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 May 2025 12:43 pm
He knows what YOU are all about.Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You have no idea what the OP is about.
You're an idiot.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 May 2025 12:45 pm
Cannonpointer » 09 May 2025, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ If you own that weak **** any farther than this, we're going to start holding you responsible for his misbehaviors.
He is too stupid to know when he is getting his *** kicked.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
9 May 2025 1:17 pm
Blackvegetable » 09 May 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ It’s not every day a neo-monarchist’s Substack helps shape disruptive federal policies. But Yarvin, 51, isn’t celebrating. In fact, in several recent interviews with The Washington Post, he offered a surprisingly harsh assessment of DOGE, comparing it to an orchestra of chimpanzees trying to perform Wagner. He also said the group’s attitude toward federal workers resembles that of a brash but insecure man who repels potential sexual partners.
“In the worst aspects of DOGE, there’s this aspect of the incel who gets mad at the girl who won’t sleep with him,” Yarvin said, using the term for so-called involuntary celibates. “That’s not a powerful attitude.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... usk-thiel/
Before we begin I ask that all the slack jaws in the room (and you know who you are) google "neo-monarchist".
Then take a very deep breath as it slowly dawns on you that one of the most influential voices of your movement has concluded what Master Vegetable told you months ago.
This will hurt, once it works its way through your block heads.
On the bright side, you'll be able to tell your grandchildren of the Babadook who authored your scars...
It appears that @GHETTO BLASTER gutted your OP like a wrecking ball crashing into a typical building in Haiti.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
9 May 2025 1:47 pm
Vegas » 09 May 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ It appears that @GHETTO BLASTER gutted your OP like a wrecking ball crashing into a typical building in Haiti.
It appears
To whom?
Who is online
In total there are 3833 users online :: 3 registered, 13 bots, and 3817 guests
Bots: AHC/2.1, GPTBot, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, CriteoBot, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, ADmantX, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, bingbot