Liberal Forum

And in one of the most puzzling instances, Trump in March claimed that he hadn’t actually signed the controversial proclamation — which has since been struck down by the courts — that the administration used to deport migrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process. This despite his signature being on it. “I don’t know when it was signed, because I didn’t sign it,” Trump said. “Other people handled it.” (A spokesman later said Trump did, in fact, sign it.)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... m-unaware/


Can I get a
"So **** g'ddammned stupid!"
from the Congregation?

I knew I could.

 

WHO'S IN CHARGE?????!!!!!!!?????

it’s certainly a notable posture from the man who said his predecessor was hopelessly disengaged and repeatedly talked about how bad it was to have people who aren’t the president call the shots.

Ibid.

Well, you know...."Lock Her Up!" .....and xit...

**** thread.

Where was this razor-sharp critique a **** year ago? Three years ago? Twat.

And there it is. **** WAPO again. Can you at least attempt to not be predictable as ****, *** boy?

Fake news

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:25 am

And in one of the most puzzling instances, Trump in March claimed that he hadn’t actually signed the controversial proclamation — which has since been struck down by the courts — that the administration used to deport migrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process. This despite his signature being on it. “I don’t know when it was signed, because I didn’t sign it,” Trump said. “Other people handled it.” (A spokesman later said Trump did, in fact, sign it.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... m-unaware/

Can I get a
"So **** g'ddammned stupid!"
from the Congregation?

I knew I could.

Autopen might help Trumpocalypse.   But I am sure  Anonymous  will get a hold of it. 

SouthernFried » Today, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:20 am

And there it is. **** WAPO again. Can you at least attempt to not be predictable as ****, *** boy?

Who doesn't  like fried wapos?  There are delectable tasty stories in the publication.

I have about a dozen now.  Nov 7th 2024 is for sale if your interested..
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:41 am

WHO'S IN CHARGE?????!!!!!!!?????

Wow.  After four years of severe cognitive decline you finally care about who is in charge.  What a turd.

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Wow.  After four years of severe cognitive decline you finally care about who is in charge.  What a turd.

Tied for #13



2XWorse than Buchanan 



How **** hard can this be to grasp?

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:25 am

And in one of the most puzzling instances, Trump in March claimed that he hadn’t actually signed the controversial proclamation — which has since been struck down by the courts — that the administration used to deport migrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process. This despite his signature being on it. “I don’t know when it was signed, because I didn’t sign it,” Trump said. “Other people handled it.” (A spokesman later said Trump did, in fact, sign it.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... m-unaware/

Can I get a
"So **** g'ddammned stupid!"
from the Congregation?

I knew I could.

Another "un named spokesman" claims he or she saw Trump do something bad and then run to the news with the scoop.
Another amazing coincidence..!
Was the "spokesman" who witnessed the signing Jean Carroll...? 

If any US Citizens have ever been accidentally deported.it was a 1 in a million shot   

 
 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Tied for #13

2XWorse than Buchanan 

How **** hard can this be to grasp?

   

DeezerShoove » Today, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:18 am

**** thread.

Where was this razor-sharp critique a **** year ago? Three years ago? Twat.

Tied for #13.


Why is this so difficult for you to swallow?


Oh, yea.....that.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

Tied for #13.

Why is this so difficult for you to swallow?

Oh, yea.....that.

In ONE survey where the left and anti trumpers were over represented.  

Just keepin’ it real.

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:32 am

Tied for #13.

Why is this so difficult for you to swallow?

Oh, yea.....that.

You assume I follow you or something.   
I don't have any idea what the **** you mean, stalker.
 

*Huey » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

52 minutes ago

In ONE survey where the left and anti trumpers were over represented.  

Just keepin’ it real.

So how did Grifty really do when the left and "anti-trumpers" weren't represented?

DeezerShoove » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

You assume I follow you or something.   
I don't have any idea what the **** you mean, stalker.

http://www.weekendu.uh.edu/news-events/ ... survey.php

*Huey » Today, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:21 am

 

I understand....they're numbers...

Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

So how did Grifty really do when the left and "anti-trumpers" weren't represented?

You tell me.  This is your weak argument/diversion.  Not mine
 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:20 am

Tied for #13

2XWorse than Buchanan 

How **** hard can this be to grasp?

Knocked Biden out of the race.

Beat his policies.

Won the popular vote.

Won ALL swing states.

Got highest vote total of any republican candidate.