Liberal Forum

Cedar » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I guess you’re too embarrassed to post it  good choice.

Cheddy,

It is not someone's interpretation.

http://www.weekendu.uh.edu/news-events/ ... survey.php
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Cheddy,

It is not someone's interpretation.

http://www.weekendu.uh.edu/news-events/ ... survey.php

Lincoln was a Republican 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:25 am

And in one of the most puzzling instances, Trump in March claimed that he hadn’t actually signed the controversial proclamation — which has since been struck down by the courts — that the administration used to deport migrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process. This despite his signature being on it. “I don’t know when it was signed, because I didn’t sign it,” Trump said. “Other people handled it.” (A spokesman later said Trump did, in fact, sign it.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... m-unaware/

Can I get a
"So **** g'ddammned stupid!"
from the Congregation?

I knew I could.

Ah, another thrilling installment of Grifticles Presents: Screenshot Journalism—complete with a quote, a link, and a request for applause. No argument. No context. No original thought. Just another tossed headline with a wink, followed by the usual:

"So **** g'ddammned stupid!"

So here’s the pattern, yet again:

1. Drop a quote from someone else
2. Avoid taking a stance
3. Demand everyone else “interpret” it for you
4. Call them idiots when they do

If this thread were any more hollow, it’d echo. Still waiting for something past Level 1, Grifticles. But hey—Dodge #143 still count.Let’s help you out, Grifticles. Since you’ve already outsourced your thinking to the Washington Post (again), I’ll go ahead and toss you a question you can immediately sidestep:

If Trump’s mishandling of executive actions is “so g'ddammned stupid,” then how do you explain the continued legal ambiguity around similar proclamations issued by previous administrations—Dem or GOP?

Now, go ahead and pretend you don’t understand your own OP.
Or better yet—ask me to “demonstrate mine” again while you sprint toward Dodge #143. Clock’s ticking.

1. Easy one - He will now hide behind his favorite loop "demonstrate that you understand the OP."
 
 
 

Vegas » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Ah, another thrilling installment of Grifticles Presents: Screenshot Journalism—complete with a quote, a link, and a request for applause. No argument. No context. No original thought. Just another tossed headline with a wink, followed by the usual:

So here’s the pattern, yet again:

1. Drop a quote from someone else
2. Avoid taking a stance
3. Demand everyone else “interpret” it for you
4. Call them idiots when they do

If this thread were any more hollow, it’d echo. Still waiting for something past Level 1, Grifticles. But hey—Dodge #143 still count.Let’s help you out, Grifticles. Since you’ve already outsourced your thinking to the Washington Post (again), I’ll go ahead and toss you a question you can immediately sidestep:

Now, go ahead and pretend you don’t understand your own OP.
Or better yet—ask me to “demonstrate mine” again while you sprint toward Dodge #143. Clock’s ticking.

1. Easy one - He will now hide behind his favorite loop "demonstrate that you understand the OP."

The far more pressing question is why you struggle to understand the clear meaning of the OP...

Blackvegetable » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

Cheddy,

It is not someone's interpretation.

http://www.weekendu.uh.edu/news-events/ ... survey.php

“525 respondents were invited to participate, and 154 usable responses were received, yielding a 29.3% response rate.

        

 
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

The far more pressing question is why you struggle to understand the clear meaning of the OP...

          Did you not read my prediction? 

You dumb mother ****. 

Blackvegetable » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

Cheddy,

It is not someone's interpretation.

http://www.weekendu.uh.edu/news-events/ ... survey.php

How many of the 154 respondents are political historians? The two morons conducting the survey aren’t.

**chuckle** 
 
 

Cedar » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

How many of the 154 respondents are political historians? The two morons conducting the survey aren’t.

**chuckle**

They don't have to be.


 

Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

The far more pressing question is why you struggle to understand the clear meaning of the OP...

My prediction          

1. Easy one - He will now hide behind his favorite loop "demonstrate that you understand the OP."

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

They don't have to be.

So they’re self styled experts?

Cedar » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

So they’re self styled experts?

They administer the survey.



 

Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

My prediction       

Easy enough to check...

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

They administer the survey.

This survey?

Partisan breakdown (2024)

• Democrats – 95
• Republicans – 15

 
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

They administer the survey.

Who are the respondents, how do we even know they exist?

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Easy enough to check...

You did again. Stop your **** hiding and answer the question. We both know that you can't. 

1. You will continue to hide behind your usual loop -"demonstrate your knowledge...blah blah blah..."

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

You did again. Stop your **** hiding and answer the question. We both know that you can't. 

1. You will continue to hide behind your usual loop -"demonstrate your knowledge...blah blah blah..."

Is that

"Sure, let's!"


Or is it


"No...my vegasvagina is cramping!"
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Is that

"Sure, let's!"

Or is it

"No...my vegasvagina is cramping!"

No idea what your mumbling about. However, you did your usual cowardly tactic - responded to a question with a question.

You will do anything to avoid providing a level 2+ . Literally anything. 

Morons will be morons.


1. You will now hide behind one of the following tactics- question/demand, "are these your words", or "demonstrate that you understand...etc..."

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

No idea what your mumbling about. However, you did your usual cowardly tactic - responded to a question with a question.

You will do anything to avoid providing a level 2+ . Literally anything. 

Morons will be morons.

1. You will now hide behind one of the following tactics- question/demand, "are these your words", or "demonstrate that you understand...etc..."

This is about whether or not your question reflects an understanding of the OP.

I have a simple test to determine that it doesn't..

Are you prepared to participate?
 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

This is about whether or not your question reflects an understanding of the OP.

I have a simple test to determine that it doesn't..

Are you prepared to participate?

And there it is—for the 150th time—“demonstrate that you understand the OP.” This is your intellectual smoke alarm: loud, annoying, and triggered every time someone asks you a real question.

At this point, it’s not a debate tactic—it’s a looping GIF of cowardice.

So here’s the deal:
When you’re ready to step out from behind your cut-and-paste quotes, your deflections, and your endless pop quizzes—
Then we’ll continue. Until then?
You’re on mute, Grifticles.
Let me know when Dodge Season ends.
 

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

And there it is—for the 150th time—“demonstrate that you understand the OP.” This is your intellectual smoke alarm: loud, annoying, and triggered every time someone asks you a real question.

At this point, it’s not a debate tactic—it’s a looping GIF of cowardice.

So here’s the deal:
When you’re ready to step out from behind your cut-and-paste quotes, your deflections, and your endless pop quizzes—
Then we’ll continue. Until then?
You’re on mute, Grifticles.
Let me know when Dodge Season ends.

Is that a "yes" or a "no"?