murdock » 20 May 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps because they are leaders of industry, creating untold thousands of jobs and other opportunities for Americans everywhere? Ask yourself, "How many people does Microsoft employ?" Well as of 2024 the answer was (according to the internet) was 228,000. That's a lot of tax revenue, money pouring into the economy, buying needed things, homes, vehicles, children's needs, etc. etc. etc. etc. That's a hell of an incentive right there. Unless of course like most leftist stains, you want this country to fail, you should support them as well.
Are you bipolar?jerrab » 20 May 2025, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ it has been that way for a long time, never changes. the only that changes are the tax breaks for millionaires.
I wasn't worried about oprah.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑ That makes as much sense as your last couple of posts where her name came up.
Here's some info, and some advice:
Oprah is gonna be okay; She doesn't need your protection.
Take a Xanax.
Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you bipolar?
It's hard to keep up.
Are ya SURE that billionaire over-representation isn't purely a repuke thing - or primarily one? Is that your final answer?
Do BOTH parties kiss the ring and lick the taint?
rich are rich
murdock » 20 May 2025, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Good **** stain, good! When called out start spraying **** like everyone of you lying child molesting pieces of **** do!
Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you bipolar?
It's hard to keep up.
Are ya SURE that billionaire over-representation isn't purely a repuke thing - or primarily one? Is that your final answer?
Do BOTH parties kiss the ring and lick the taint?
murdock » 20 May 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps because they are leaders of industry, creating untold thousands of jobs and other opportunities for Americans everywhere? Ask yourself, "How many people does Microsoft employ?" Well as of 2024 the answer was (according to the internet) was 228,000. That's a lot of tax revenue, money pouring into the economy, buying needed things, homes, vehicles, children's needs, etc. etc. etc. etc. That's a hell of an incentive right there. Unless of course like most leftist stains, you want this country to fail, you should support them as well.
have they tried to stop it when it happens?jerrab » 20 May 2025, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ i wonder what would happen if the dems passed a bill giving huge tax cuts to millionaires,
Why is it so hard for you to live as a piss ant?Mrkelly » 20 May 2025, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ have they tried to stop it when it happens?
other than the usual few
the ALL obey their doners
You seemed to be. You seemed to suggest she was in danger of being victimized on racial grounds or some silly ****.
Are ya sure?
They're way too busy on billionaire dick.jerrab » 20 May 2025, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ i wonder what would happen if the dems passed a bill giving huge tax cuts to millionaires,
I never said anything like that. I said that she and other democrats are not who the republicans are protecting with tax cuts.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ You seemed to be. You seemed to suggest she was in danger of being victimized on racial grounds or some silly ****.
I can promise you, she's a **** of a lot whiter than I am or you are. That much green whitewashes deep.
what can they do other than vote against it or like sanders and have rallies about it?Mrkelly » 20 May 2025, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ have they tried to stop it when it happens?
other than the usual few
the ALL obey their doners
trump's big beautiful tax bill.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ . Which bill are we referring to, by the way? The OP doesn't mention any bills.
i blame the trans politics for screwing up the democrat party and causing the reps to get so many seats,Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Are ya sure?
Which ones are the bad guys again? I've lost track, what with TPP, transpolitics, and the opening of our borders to third world brown people exclusively.
I guess when we started imprisoning women with men in violation of the Geneva Conventions and 80 years of international treaties to which we are signatory and which comprise settled international law, I just forgot how the democ rats were morally superior. But this bill your making reference to, I'm sure THAT element of the show will help me understand that the democ rats are - while not perfect, - the lesser evil.
I mean, **** women and kids - it's this particular bill that matters, even though it could never have passed without the democ rats' tacit support while pretending to resist. Which bill are we referring to, by the way? The OP doesn't mention any bills.
to be pissed at the rich screwing the poor is bipolar?Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you bipolar?
It's hard to keep up.
Are ya SURE that billionaire over-representation isn't purely a repuke thing - or primarily one? Is that your final answer?
Do BOTH parties kiss the ring and lick the taint?
where I live is already having lots of problems with TRUMP cutting off harvesters.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Are ya sure?
Which ones are the bad guys again? I've lost track, what with TPP, transpolitics, and the opening of our borders to third world brown people exclusively.
I guess when we started imprisoning women with men in violation of the Geneva Conventions and 80 years of international treaties to which we are signatory and which comprise settled international law, I just forgot how the democ rats were morally superior. But this bill your making reference to, I'm sure THAT element of the show will help me understand that the democ rats are - while not perfect, - the lesser evil.
I mean, **** women and kids - it's this particular bill that matters, even though it could never have passed without the democ rats' tacit support while pretending to resist. Which bill are we referring to, by the way? The OP doesn't mention any bills.
I see. So you were telling a different lie than the one I answered.jerrab » 20 May 2025, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I never said anything like that. I said that she and other democrats are not who the republicans are protecting with tax cuts.