Liberal Forum

I dont even think most ya people even have Basic"Understanding"

But eh throw up the Farmer as a Talking Point too
 

when trump was in qatar he should have been ashamed of himself. all people in qatar have free healthcare and free education.

murdock » Yesterday, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:47 pm

LOL! Typos are deadly! I was trying to type Mr queerly!

To which? Ancestral position or character role playing something more than all one has been since conceived in ever changing form since personal conception here now?

Accountability since alive. Life doesn't duplicate previous generation gap results twice so far. Vocabulary stays the same between generation gaps speaking and speculating what else is possible in the same languages doing the same things socially every rotation forward so far.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:51 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:51 pm

To pretend one minute that the class war is partisan and the next minute admit - at least implicitly - that it is not. 

Back and forth you go.

I take the firm stand that republicans fight for republicans even though a few rich democrats might benefit as well. 

and if mark zuckerford is counted among the democrats, let me say that the rules on facebook are changed. perhaps trump promised him reduction in his taxes.

31stArrival » Today, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:49 am

To which? Ancestral position or character role playing something more than all one has been since conceived in ever changing form since personal conception here now?

Accountability since alive. Life doesn't duplicate previous generation gap results twice so far. Vocabulary stays the same between generation gaps speaking and speculating what else is possible in the same languages doing the same things socially every rotation forward so far.

Choke on it.

murdock » Today, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:45 am

Choke on it.

you are choking on your own reality, I have a clear instinctive awareness of my trying to correct social corruption since Black Friday 2006.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:07 pm

You seemed to be. You seemed to suggest she was in danger of being victimized on racial grounds or some silly ****. 

I can promise you, she's a **** of a lot whiter than I am or you are. That much green whitewashes deep.

I don't even like oprah winfrey.
 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:16 pm

Are ya sure?

Which ones are the bad guys again? I've lost track, what with TPP, transpolitics, and the opening of our borders to third world brown people exclusively. 

I guess when we started imprisoning women with men in violation of the Geneva Conventions and 80 years of international treaties to which we are signatory and which comprise settled international law, I just forgot how the democ rats were morally superior. But this bill your making reference to, I'm sure THAT element of the show will help me understand that the democ rats are - while not perfect, - the lesser evil. 

I mean, **** women and kids - it's  this particular bill that matters, even though it could never have passed without the democ rats' tacit support while pretending to resist. Which bill are we referring to, by the way? The OP doesn't mention any bills.

it is put to the vote and not one democrat vote is needed to get it passed.

more about the bill.//////////////////////////////

The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" includes a provision that could significantly limit federal courts' authority to enforce contempt citations, particularly in cases involving the Trump administration. Specifically, the bill stipulates that courts cannot use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security bond was posted when the injunction was issued. This applies retroactively and prospectively, affecting orders issued prior to, on, or after the bill's enactment. Here's Erwin Chemerinsky in "Just Security" warning about it:
 
 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:16 pm

Are ya sure?

Which ones are the bad guys again? I've lost track, what with TPP, transpolitics, and the opening of our borders to third world brown people exclusively. 

I guess when we started imprisoning women with men in violation of the Geneva Conventions and 80 years of international treaties to which we are signatory and which comprise settled international law, I just forgot how the democ rats were morally superior. But this bill your making reference to, I'm sure THAT element of the show will help me understand that the democ rats are - while not perfect, - the lesser evil. 

I mean, **** women and kids - it's  this particular bill that matters, even though it could never have passed without the democ rats' tacit support while pretending to resist. Which bill are we referring to, by the way? The OP doesn't mention any bills.

we have lost america when this bill passes.

----------------------------------

Now is not the time to limit the ability of federal courts to enforce their judicial orders. But in light of dozens of federal courts finding actions by President Donald Trump to be unconstitutional, some House Republicans are trying to do exactly that. A provision in the proposed spending bill would restrict the authority of federal courts to hold government officials in contempt when they violate court orders. Without the contempt power, judicial orders are meaningless and can be ignored.
There is no way to understand this except as a way to keep the Trump administration from being restrained when it violates the Constitution or otherwise breaks the law. The House and the Senate should reject this effort to limit judicial power. Hopefully recent public opinion survey data — showing vast majorities want the Trump administration to stop an action if a federal court ruled it illegal – will guide these legislators to the right outcome. If this anti-democratic legislation is adopted, the courts should declare it unconstitutional as violating separation of powers.
The provision in the proposed budget reconciliation bill states: “No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), whether issued prior to, on, or subsequent to the date of enactment of this section.”
 

https://apnews.com/article/trump-courts ... 1fc8039dd0

welcome to no more laws other than trump's or otherwise known as trump is the supreme ruler of america ///////“We do have authority over the federal courts, as you know,” the Republican speaker said. “We can eliminate an entire district court. We have power of funding over the courts, and all these other things.”
 

31stArrival » Today, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:51 am

you are choking on your own reality, I have a clear instinctive awareness of my trying to correct social corruption since Black Friday 2006.

Choke on the palomino dick in your mother's ***. Daily going forward from stable to stable.

jerrab » Today, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:02 pm

I don't even like oprah winfrey.

What about Oprah with hollandaise sauce?

murdock » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

What about Oprah with hollandaise sauce?

is that what you what comes out of your ***?

murdock » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

53 minutes ago

Choke on the palomino dick in your mother's ***. Daily going forward from stable to stable.

I doubt you will ever accept all you became staying a role playing character on a world stage of events pretending nobody knew their time alive was physically measured by rotations your ancestral position was alive in so far.

31stArrival » Today, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:38 pm

I doubt you will ever accept all you became staying a role playing character on a world stage of events pretending nobody knew their time alive was physically measured by rotations your ancestral position was alive in so far.

You spew more **** in one day than the rest of the galaxy. I only wish your mother had coat hangered your vile babbling **** spewing hide. Choke you horse dick sucking ***.
 

https://youtu.be/eBfKckP1H0Y?si=-bpJ16Z6l1LNpd5u

jerrab » Today, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:52 pm

is that what you call what comes out of your ***?

No, I call that your mother.

jerrab » Yesterday, 11:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:24 pm

https://www.kcur.org/news/2025-03-28/ha ... uri-kansas

----------------------------------Harvesters, the food bank that serves the Kansas City area and helps supply food to local pantries and shelters, says that thousands of cases of canned food, eggs, milk and more were called off by President Trump's U.S. Department of Agriculture.The Trump administration has canceled orders for truckloads of food — including cases of milk, eggs, cheese, chicken and fruit — that had been slated for Missouri and Kansas food pantries and hunger outreach groups beginning in April.As part of an ongoing campaign to slash the federal budget, the U.S. Department of Agriculture pulled the plug on $500 million worth of government commodities designated for food banks nationwide.

Half a billion on TOP of WIC and welfare and SNAP. In a nation with an obesity epidemic. A nation that defines "food insecurity" as "having gone to bed without dinner at least on time in the past year."

I'm more concerned about getting these damned teenagers to stop smoking on the corner and tossing their butts in my grass. And they need to stop getting my grand daughters pregnant.   
 

jerrab » Yesterday, 11:28 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:28 pm

------------------------------------------

https://apnews.com/article/trump-big-be ... 2029abd8c8

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tax breaks tallying more than $5 trillion — but also sizable reductions in Medicaid health care, food stamps and green energy strategies to fight climate change — faced sharp debate as House lawmakers slogged through marathon overnight hearings on Republicans’ “big, beautiful bill.”Tensions rose and emotions flared as the hours dragged on into early Wednesday morning. House Republicans are working to push President Donald Trump’s signature legislative package through a gauntlet of committees and mounting opposition from Democrats, advocacy groups and even some wary Republicans themselves.

The repukes have an 8 seat lead. If the dems can flip five, the bill goes to take a **** and the bears eat it. Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick is a gimme. They need four more.  Fitzpatrick of PA and Suozzi of New York and Josh Gottheimer out of Jersey and Ed Case our of Hawaii and Nicole Malliotakis outo f New York and Andrew Garbarino out of New York, they should easily be able to beat it - assuming the dems unite and no blue dogs **** in the punch bowl. 

Those are not the only leaky vessels the republican house majority leader has to contend with - that is just one group of them: the republican members of the Problem Solvers Caucus. There are some main stream republicans who live to **** on trump if they can get away with it. 

They need four to flip the senate. Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins a gimme. They need three more. The three exist - I won't belabor. 

 But the TRUTH is, the dems are not against the bill and will not work to stop it. It's a bomb they can throw to get the base **** itself. They're in on it. And you're falling for it.