Kudos for tRump again?

User avatar
By Mrkelly
16 May 2025 2:17 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 7 8 9 10 11
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 6:17 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,552 posts
jerrab » Today, 1:08 am » wrote:   nothing to do with the topic.
It was a metaphor. It was agreement with your thesis. It was, "Yeah, no ****."
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
jerra b
21 May 2025 6:20 pm
User avatar
      
8,926 posts
Cannonpointer » 9 minutes ago » wrote: The repukes have an 8 seat lead. If the dems can flip five, the bill goes to take a **** and the bears eat it. Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick is a gimme. They need four more.  Fitzpatrick of PA and Suozzi of New York and Josh Gottheimer out of Jersey and Ed Case our of Hawaii and Nicole Malliotakis outo f New York and Andrew Garbarino out of New York, they should easily be able to beat it - assuming the dems unite and no blue dogs **** in the punch bowl. 

Those are not the only leaky vessels the republican house majority leader has to contend with - that is just one group of them: the republican members of the Problem Solvers Caucus. There are some main stream republicans who live to **** on trump if they can get away with it. 

They need four to flip the senate. Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins a gimme. They need three more. The three exist - I won't belabor. 

 But the TRUTH is, the dems are not against the bill and will not work to stop it. It's a bomb they can throw to get the base **** itself. They're in on it. And you're falling for it.

I am pretty sure the dems are against it all those cuts to food stamps and medicaid are horrendous.

any dem that votes for it will never getting elected..... ever.
User avatar
jerra b
21 May 2025 6:28 pm
User avatar
      
8,927 posts
Cannonpointer » 19 minutes ago » wrote: The repukes have an 8 seat lead. If the dems can flip five, the bill goes to take a **** and the bears eat it. Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick is a gimme. They need four more.  Fitzpatrick of PA and Suozzi of New York and Josh Gottheimer out of Jersey and Ed Case our of Hawaii and Nicole Malliotakis outo f New York and Andrew Garbarino out of New York, they should easily be able to beat it - assuming the dems unite and no blue dogs **** in the punch bowl. 

Those are not the only leaky vessels the republican house majority leader has to contend with - that is just one group of them: the republican members of the Problem Solvers Caucus. There are some main stream republicans who live to **** on trump if they can get away with it. 

They need four to flip the senate. Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins a gimme. They need three more. The three exist - I won't belabor. 

 But the TRUTH is, the dems are not against the bill and will not work to stop it. It's a bomb they can throw to get the base **** itself. They're in on it. And you're falling for it.
too risky to have it passed.
User avatar
Mrkelly
21 May 2025 6:30 pm
User avatar
      
9,331 posts
jerrab » 12 minutes ago » wrote: I am pretty sure the dems are against it all those cuts to food stamps and medicaid are horrendous.

any dem that votes for it will never getting elected..... ever.
some republican elected officials have figured it out

Not all people on welfare and Medicaid are democrats 

not sure why this has become a left or right issue 

Dems voted for the largest upward transfer of wealth in the world 

don’t pretend that the dems care about anything but their donors wishes 
Image
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 6:32 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,556 posts
jerrab » Today, 8:32 am » wrote: I take the firm stand that republicans fight for republicans even though a few rich democrats might benefit as well. 
And I take the firmer stance (firmer because it's smarter) that there are no republicans and democrats at the level of the oligarchs. Just actors, playing roles, and each are members of the same brotherhood with the same interests working toward the same ends.
jerrab » Today, 8:32 am » wrote: and if mark zuckerford is counted among the democrats, let me say that the rules on facebook are changed. perhaps trump promised him reduction in his taxes.
I commiserate with you that the election of Trump threw a monkey wrench into the fascism and censorship that your party supports and relies on.
jerrab » Today, 8:32 am » wrote: /////////Meta has loosened its public rules on hate speech
You can define woman - and bully for you.

But you cannot define hate speech, so you should STFU about it.
jerrab » Today, 8:32 am » wrote: as Mark Zuckerberg seeks to curry favour with Donald Trump.//////////  ------------------------------/////////

Zuckerberg also loosened moderation rules around offensive speech ...
Just notice that you are complaining about less censorship.

Do this BEFORE you shoot yourself, not after.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 6:34 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,558 posts
jerrab » Today, 12:02 pm » wrote: I don't even like oprah winfrey.
Perhaps you should cease to do mental gymnastics that cast the .01%er as a weakling who only gets HER tax breaks because they cannot figure out a way to gerrymander the code?
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 6:36 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,558 posts
jerrab » Today, 12:09 pm » wrote: it is put to the vote and not one democrat vote is needed to get it passed.

more about the bill.//////////////////////////////

The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" includes a provision that could significantly limit federal courts' authority to enforce contempt citations, particularly in cases involving the Trump administration. Specifically, the bill stipulates that courts cannot use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security bond was posted when the injunction was issued. This applies retroactively and prospectively, affecting orders issued prior to, on, or after the bill's enactment. Here's Erwin Chemerinsky in "Just Security" warning about it:
 
 

 
Thank you for sharing someone else's analysis of the bill that has you self-pissing. If the worse thing it does is that, it's one of the best bills of the century. I am confident it does a lot worse **** - and I'm not sweating it. 

I am equally confident that the democrats are in token opposition to it and will see that it passes, whatever it takes. If five of the house repukes flip, one democ rat that loses the rochambo will flip the other way. Google, "Joe Lieberman."
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 6:39 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,561 posts
jerrab » Today, 12:29 pm » wrote: we have lost america when this bill passes.

----------------------------------

https://www.justsecurity.org/113529/ter ... mpt-court/

Now is not the time to limit the ability of federal courts to enforce their judicial orders.
I agree. Now is not the time to limit the ability of federal courts to enforce their judicial orders.

The state of Califormnia voted against gay marriage. The people of America were against it. Google, "democracy."

Activist judges made it a thing. Not democracy. Not the people. A few cocksuckers in robes who answer to no one. 

The time to limit the ability of federal courts to enforce their judicial orders passed us by in the early teens.

Better late than never.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 6:44 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,563 posts
jerrab » 28 minutes ago » wrote: I am pretty sure the dems are against it all those cuts to food stamps and medicaid are horrendous.

any dem that votes for it will never getting elected..... ever.
That's why they have golden parachutes, son. Google, "Joe Lieberman." He mucked in. He did the dirty work. The other dems got to play innocent. And we didn't get the public option. And you fell for it. You put it on Joe, and you pretended the democ rats tried. 
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 6:46 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,563 posts
jerrab » 20 minutes ago » wrote: too risky to have it passed.
If AIPAC wants it, if President Netanyahu wants them to, your demonrats will vote for it, child. No matter what.

One or more - whatever number it takes - will lose the round of rochambo and take one for the team. 

They'll be okay, after. I promise. I truly promise. 
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
jerra b
21 May 2025 10:04 pm
User avatar
      
8,929 posts
Cannonpointer » Today, 6:36 pm » wrote: Thank you for sharing someone else's analysis of the bill that has you self-pissing. If the worse thing it does is that, it's one of the best bills of the century. I am confident it does a lot worse **** - and I'm not sweating it. 

I am equally confident that the democrats are in token opposition to it and will see that it passes, whatever it takes. If five of the house repukes flip, one democ rat that loses the rochambo will flip the other way. Google, "Joe Lieberman."

this  is absolute scary or do you have a reason why trump needs to be all powerful.
User avatar
jerra b
21 May 2025 10:05 pm
User avatar
      
8,929 posts
Cannonpointer » Today, 6:46 pm » wrote: If AIPAC wants it, if President Netanyahu wants them to, your demonrats will vote for it, child. No matter what.

One or more - whatever number it takes - will lose the round of rochambo and take one for the team. 

They'll be okay, after. I promise. I truly promise.
the person who answers to israel is trump.
User avatar
jerra b
21 May 2025 10:08 pm
User avatar
      
8,931 posts
Cannonpointer » Today, 6:44 pm » wrote: That's why they have golden parachutes, son. Google, "Joe Lieberman." He mucked in. He did the dirty work. The other dems got to play innocent. And we didn't get the public option. And you fell for it. You put it on Joe, and you pretended the democ rats tried.
you fell for the el salvador president has no authority to  release a prisoner bit.
 
User avatar
jerra b
21 May 2025 10:09 pm
User avatar
      
8,931 posts
jerrab » 2 minutes ago » wrote: you fell for the el salvador president has no authority to  release a prisoner bit.

in a jail in el salvadore.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 10:12 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,569 posts
jerrab » 11 minutes ago » wrote:
Cannonpointer » Today, 6:36 pm » wrote: Thank you for sharing someone else's analysis of the bill that has you self-pissing. If the worse thing it does is that, it's one of the best bills of the century. I am confident it does a lot worse **** - and I'm not sweating it. 

I am equally confident that the democrats are in token opposition to it and will see that it passes, whatever it takes. If five of the house repukes flip, one democ rat that loses the rochambo will flip the other way. Google, "Joe Lieberman."
this  is absolute scary or do you have a reason why trump needs to be all powerful.
If you're gonna hit reply, you should reply. :)
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 10:14 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,569 posts
jerrab » 10 minutes ago » wrote: the person who answers to israel is trump.
"The" person?

They all answer to israel, dummy. YOU answer to israel - every time you file a tax return. So do I.

Don't take my word for it. Ask President Netanyahu. 
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 10:15 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,569 posts
jerrab » 8 minutes ago » wrote: you fell for the el salvador president has no authority to  release a prisoner bit.
If by "fell for it" you mean laughed my *** off about it, ya got me, Pook.  :die:  
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
jerra b
21 May 2025 10:57 pm
User avatar
      
8,935 posts
Cannonpointer » 48 minutes ago » wrote: If you're gonna hit reply, you should reply. Image

I am sorry if I did not convey that it would be the darkest hour in american history.

no joke, no laughing matter just pure sadness. the republicans are willing to destroy any america's principles that are left  for trump.
User avatar
jerra b
21 May 2025 10:59 pm
User avatar
      
8,935 posts
Cannonpointer » 46 minutes ago » wrote: If by "fell for it" you mean laughed my *** off about it, ya got me, Pook.  Image
of course the el salvadore version of trump has no power in el salvadore.
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
21 May 2025 11:45 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,570 posts
jerrab » 47 minutes ago » wrote: of course the el salvadore version of trump has no power in el salvadore.
I didn't get too deeply into the issue - and I suspect that I still have a better understanding of it than you do.

My surface observation is that Trump tossed a criminal out, the court tried to block him, he used the other fella down there as a human shield, saying "Hey, this guy refuses to return the criminal I deported. HE is defying the judge; I'm not." Bada bing, bada boom, Trump has his way, AND he has plausible deniability.

That is my understanding. And in THAT understanding, this silliness about the guy having no power - or that there is some republican narrative that the guy has no power - is girl power. 

Wanna have a google war? I will wager that I can prove your controllers/feeders are abusing you. 
 
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile

"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 7 8 9 10 11

Who is online

In total there are 946 users online :: 5 registered, 16 bots, and 925 guests
Bots: Applebot, app.hypefactors.com, facebookexternalhit, proximic, Yahoo! Slurp, Mediapartners-Google, CriteoBot, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, YandexBot, semantic-visions.com, Googlebot, linkfluence.com, bingbot, curl/7, BLEXBot
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum