Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 May 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 11:43 am

 

Figured out why it's the Lexington line yet?

I did a long long time ago.  Why it is called that has nothing to do with any thing, Richard.  Here is a hint, Richard.  Think Lexington Avenue,

*Huey » 17 May 2025, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 11:48 am

I did a long long time ago.  Why it is called that has nothing to do with any thing, Richard.  Here is a hint, Richard.  Think Lexington Avenue,

And Lex is on what side of Manhattan?


 

Blackvegetable » 17 May 2025, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 11:54 am

And Lex is on what side of Manhattan?

I told you. Done with 20 questions.  If you have a point, make it.  

*Huey » 17 May 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 12:01 pm

I told you. Done with 20 questions.  If you have a point, make it.

Arguing with nothing but questions [instead of presenting cold, hard facts] is how teenage girls argue.

Women cling to the hope that if they can frame a question cleverly enough, then they can "force" only one possible answer in return. 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 17 May 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 12:08 pm

Arguing with nothing but questions [instead of presenting cold, hard facts] is how teenage girls argue.

Women cling to the hope that if they can frame a question cleverly enough, then they can "force" only one possible answer in return.

He won’t make a point because he is afraid to be wrong.

Blackvegetable » 17 May 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 11:32 am

Did you cast 3 votes for a guy who played a guy on a reality TV show, whose cabinet is stocked with talking airheads from FOX?

I’m not sure I see the relevance of the question. Your answer for everything is “Didn’t you vote for the guy.”

Didn’t you vote for the guy that showered with his daughter. Don’t bother answering my question was as retarded and irrelevant as yours.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 May 2025, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2025, 5:21 pm

 FOX gives airtime to Kid Rock.

Kid Rock is a hack.

If being a hack disqualified one from air time, there would be no fox news.

Or any MSNBC.


 

Blackvegetable » 17 May 2025, 4:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 4:59 am

You must be thinking of Kid Rock.

He was relevant enough for you to bring him into the conversation, eh ***?

Notice the earrings in a single ear. Bruce sucks dicks.

jerrab » 17 May 2025, 2:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 2:45 am

sanders says the same thing all the time and gets lots  of applause.

Do Sanders and Springstupe share an audience?

jerrab » 17 May 2025, 2:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 2:47 am

mid terms won't be like the election.

Agreed. There weren't many dems getting primaried in 2024.

Hide and watch in 2026. 
 

Cedar » 17 May 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 12:31 pm

I’m not sure I see the relevance of the question. Your answer for everything is “Didn’t you vote for the guy.”

Didn’t you vote for the guy that showered with his daughter. Don’t bother answering my question was as retarded and irrelevant as yours.

You voted for a celebrity because you think The Apprentice was real.

This is not difficult.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 May 2025, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 3:00 pm

You voted for a celebrity because you think The Apprentice was real.

This is not difficult.

You’re a retard, I didn’t even like Trump when he ran the first time. I wasn’t even planning to vote that election, until the democrats started with their media backed dirty tricks. I like an underdog.

I’ve never seen a single episode of the Apprentice.
 
Must be pretty difficult, given your special needs intellect.
 

Cedar » 17 May 2025, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 4:11 pm

You’re a retard, I didn’t even like Trump when he ran the first time. I wasn’t even planning to vote that election, until the democrats started with their media backed dirty tricks. I like an underdog.

I’ve never seen a single episode of the Apprentice.
 
Must be pretty difficult, given your special needs intellect.

until the democrats started with their media backed dirty tricks.

 

Must be pretty difficult, given your special needs intellect.

everyone else is nuts...

Blackvegetable » 17 May 2025, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 4:35 pm

everyone else is nuts...

Given enough time everything the left say will be proven wrong. The Steele dossier is no different, but you bit hook line and sinker, but I’m nuts.

**chuckle** 
 

Cedar » 17 May 2025, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 4:55 pm

Given enough time everything the left say will be proven wrong. The Steele dossier is no different, but you bit hook line and sinker, but I’m nuts.

**chuckle**

Your chubby for the Grifter proved to be quite *******....then you doubled up on *******.

I understood the dossier to be "raw intelligence", like SARs....you were certain you had Dark Brandon.
 

*Huey » 17 May 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 12:11 pm

He won’t make a point because he is afraid to be wrong.

He doesn't seem to have that problem with being stupid.

Blackvegetable » 17 May 2025, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 5:42 pm

Your chubby for the Grifter proved to be quite *******....then you doubled up on *******.

I understood the dossier to be "raw intelligence", like SARs....you were certain you had Dark Brandon.

Except it wasn’t it was a complete fabrication.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 May 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 11:32 am

Did you cast 3 votes for a guy who played a guy on a reality TV show, whose cabinet is stocked with talking airheads from FOX?
 

Lesser evils than those you follow.

Cedar » 17 May 2025, 7:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2025, 7:02 pm

Except it wasn’t it was a complete fabrication.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted Smirnov last week on charges that he fed the FBI false information, including his now-discredited claim that then-Vice President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, each accepted a $5 million bribe from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma. On Tuesday, the DOJ revealed in a court filing that Smirnov said “officials associated with Russian intelligence” were allegedly involved in fabricating the story about the Bidens.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4483 ... stigation/