Cannonpointer » 20 May 2025, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ You wanna hide and watch on this one. Here's why.
If you look for the full video of the incident - an incident that was staged FOR THE CAMERAS, - you will not find it. You will only find the melee. So the CONTEXT of the melee is being deliberately kept from you, and from the other side, as well. They do this **** all the **** time, and the intention is always to play people out of pocket. You're people. That makes you a target, since they are targeting people.
Now, the target MIGHT be the left. It MIGHT be the right. You don't know. You just know it's people, and you are a person. So... hide and watch. That's what I'm doing. I would never opine on an issue where I know for SURE that one side or the other (or both) is being played. It could possibly be that these nignogs were behaving perfectly responsibly and had a genuine right to be where they were, doing what they were doing.
I will grant you, they're ***, so the more likely explanation is chimpout. But I'm just sayin, games are afoot. Be careful about making any positive assertions until they slowly release more video in this government/media psy-op.
*Huey » 21 May 2025, 5:17 am » wrote: ↑ Mary, that was for emphasis. You are having a discussion with CP and you are thinking of me? What a creepy ****.
This thread is a testament to your perversions. You are a sick lil bastard.
As opposed to simply qualifying "idiot".Mary, that was for emphasis
Tiny,You are having a discussion with CP and you are thinking of me? What a creepy ****.
My heterosexual nature and fondness for attractive women.This thread is a testament to your perversions. You are a sick lil bastard
Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ As opposed to simply qualifying "idiot".
You're a **** idiot.
Tiny,
Do you really want to go there?
My heterosexual nature and fondness for attractive women.
You've moved on to substitutes...by necessity.
Wow just "WOW"
You can't define "woman".Blackvegetable » 21 May 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ As opposed to simply qualifying "idiot".
You're a **** idiot.
Tiny,
Do you really want to go there?
My heterosexual nature and fondness for attractive women.
You've moved on to substitutes...by necessity.
If they had gone very peaceably and requested entrance that they had a legal right to request and been assaulted by law enforcement, THAT would be the context.*Beekeeper » 21 May 2025, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑ You don't need "context" to charge a crime here. You only need the ACT, which is where the CRIME IS!!
Robbing a bank to take care of a sick child is context. The ACT OF ROBBING is the crime. One doesn't excuse the other.