Liberal Forum

NOT passing the Bill would have meant a HUGE tax increase on the American people, BUT, THAT is EXACTLY what the Democrats wanted... KNOWING it would NOT be good for America OR the American People, and to THAT... America has to ask itself:  "WHO are the Democrats supporting"?  CERTAILLY NOT the American people...

BUT, THAT is now in the rear view mirror... Republicans WIN ! the American PEOPLE WIN !, and Democrats LOSE !  The Republican bill, along with ALL the cash pouring into America... WILL result in HUGE Economic GROWTH (3-4%/yr.), along with DOWNSIZING the BLOATED Federal Government, and the HUGE NEW source of income from American Tariffs (that MAKE trade MORE FAIR for America, and the American People)... will reduce the National Debt, Diminish the Federal WEAPONIZATION and CORRUPTION... and and "MAKE America GREAT Again" !!

Donald Trump WINS Again !!

https://www.newsweek.com/trumps-big-bea ... se-2075670
 

THIS is what was at stake by passing/not passing the BIG BEAUTIFUL bill:

Passing:
1) Lower taxes for ALL Americans,
2) Spurring the Economy to 3-4% growth,
3) Funding border wall completion,
4) Reduced red tape on Oil exploration and energy production in America
5) A Supplement to Trumps Tariff strategy, and Downsizing Government !!
6) Making America GREAT Again... or

NOT Passing:
1) HUGE Tax hike for Americans,
2) Jeopardizing near term American GROWTH,
3) STOPPING completion of the Border Wall,
4) Keeping energy prices HIGH,
5) Jeopardizing reduction of the U.S. Deficit.
6) Cutting the LEGS out from under Making America GREAT Again !!

SO, it's EASY to see why DEMOCRATS wanted to defeat the bill... BUT, why did the RINO Republicans oppose it? The answer is simple there TOO... THEY are more Democrat, ANTI American, and PRO Corrupt Government than anything... and SHOULD ALL be defeated, along with the ANTI American Democrats, and REMOVED from political office ASAP !!
 
 
 

ConservativeWave » 22 May 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 7:43 am

THIS is what was at stake by passing/not passing the BIG BEAUTIFUL bill:

Passing:
1) Lower taxes for ALL Americans,
2) Spurring the Economy to 3-4% growth,
3) Funding border wall completion,
4) Reduced red tape on Oil exploration and energy production in America
5) A Supplement to Trumps Tariff strategy, and Downsizing Government !!
6) Making America GREAT Again... or

NOT Passing:
1) HUGE Tax hike for Americans,
2) Jeopardizing near term American GROWTH,
3) STOPPING completion of the Border Wall,
4) Keeping energy prices HIGH,
5) Jeopardizing reduction of the U.S. Deficit.
6) Cutting the LEGS out from under Making America GREAT Again !!

SO, it's EASY to see why DEMOCRATS wanted to defeat the bill... BUT, why did the RINO Republicans oppose it? The answer is simple there TOO... THEY are more Democrat, ANTI American, and PRO Corrupt Government than anything... and SHOULD ALL be defeated, along with the ANTI American Democrats, and REMOVED from political office ASAP !!

SO, it's EASY to see why DEMOCRATS wanted to defeat the bill

They can’t. 


**** idiot.

It is being held up by loonier REPUBLICANS.

As for it's "benefits"?

Just look at capital markets. 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 8:10 am

They can’t. 

**** idiot.

It is being held up by loonier REPUBLICANS.

As for it's "benefits"?

Just look at capital markets.

It passed 

BuckNaked » 22 May 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 8:14 am

It passed

Too bad.

Longer-dated Treasuries and US stock futures returned to losses after President Donald Trump’s signature tax bill narrowly passed the House.



Adult bidnessmen must be back in charge.

yipee!

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 8:16 am

Too bad.

Why is it bad?

BuckNaked » 22 May 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 9:01 am

Why is it bad?

He's a MORON... just feel sorry for him & walk ON by....

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 8:10 am

They can’t. 

**** idiot.

It is being held up by loonier REPUBLICANS.

As for it's "benefits"?

Just look at capital markets.

I hope you catch one soon you lying bastard.

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 8:16 am

Too bad.

I hope they hang your lying traitor ***.

ConservativeWave » 22 May 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 6:45 am

NOT passing the Bill would have meant a HUGE tax increase on the American people, BUT, THAT is EXACTLY what the Democrats wanted... KNOWING it would NOT be good for America OR the American People, and to THAT... America has to ask itself:  "WHO are the Democrats supporting"?  CERTAILLY NOT the American people...

BUT, THAT is now in the rear view mirror... Republicans WIN ! the American PEOPLE WIN !, and Democrats LOSE !  The Republican bill, along with ALL the cash pouring into America... WILL result in HUGE Economic GROWTH (3-4%/yr.), along with DOWNSIZING the BLOATED Federal Government, and the HUGE NEW source of income from American Tariffs (that MAKE trade MORE FAIR for America, and the American People)... will reduce the National Debt, Diminish the Federal WEAPONIZATION and CORRUPTION... and and "MAKE America GREAT Again" !!

Donald Trump WINS Again !!

https://www.newsweek.com/trumps-big-bea ... se-2075670
 

Wait until everyone finds out what was in it. Seems red flags were goin off last couple of days.

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 8:16 am

Too bad.

You should check this place out.  I think its right up your poopshoot. https://www.thecyclewitch.com/****
 

BuckNaked » 22 May 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 9:01 am

Why is it bad?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-repub ... 12287.html

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/21/politics ... posed-cuts
 

CNN — House Republicans are pushing to slash nearly $1 trillion from two of the nation’s bedrock safety net programs, Medicaid and food stamps, as part of their sweeping package aimed at enacting President Donald Trump’s agenda. If the legislation is approved, millions of Americans could lose access to these benefits as a result of a historic pullback in federal support.Trump has repeatedly vowed not to touch Medicaid, while GOP lawmakers insist that their proposals would largely affect adults who could – and should, in their view – be employed. But the actual impact would likely hit a far broader range of Americans, including some of the most vulnerable people the GOP has promised repeatedly to protect, experts say. They include children, people with disabilities and senior citizens.A sizeable share of the US population depends on these programs. More than 71 million people are enrolled in Medicaid, and roughly 42 million Americans receive food stamps, according to the federal agencies that oversee them.

jerrab » 22 May 2025, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 3:34 pm

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-repub ... 12287.html

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/21/politics ... posed-cuts

So the senate wants to cut more?   Ok where?

BuckNaked » 22 May 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 3:35 pm

So the senate wants to cut more?   Ok where?

the senate will make changes. 

Skans » 22 May 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 3:20 pm

You should check this place out.  I think its right up your poopshoot. https://www.thecyclewitch.com/****

love her titties 

ConservativeWave » 22 May 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 12:55 pm

He's a MORON... just feel sorry for him & walk ON by....

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democr ... cans-seats

BuckNaked » 22 May 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 3:35 pm

So the senate wants to cut more?   Ok where?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congre ... rcna206705

BuckNaked » 22 May 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2025, 3:35 pm

So the senate wants to cut more?   Ok where?

--------------------------
“No. We’ll make changes,” Hoeven said. “We’ve been talking with the House and there’s a lot of things we agree on. … But there’ll be changes in a number of areas.”It wouldn’t surprise House members to learn that their Senate colleagues want to put their own fingerprints on the final multitrillion-dollar package. But Republican senators have already begun to identify a variety of provisions in the House measure that they’re targeting for revisions — from Medicaid concerns to clean energy funding to spectrum policy and overall red ink.Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., came out against the emerging House legislation this week, saying it will explode the U.S. budget deficit.“I don’t see any scenario where it’s going to be deficit-neutral. That’s my problem,” he told NBC News. “By my calculation, this is going to increase the deficit by $4 trillion.”“The amount that they’re looking to reduce spending is about 1.3%. It’s a rounding error. It’s completely inadequate,” Johnson said as he insists federal spending be at least lowered to pre-pandemic levels.Republicans have 53 senators, meaning they can only lose three votes before the bill collapses int he chamber, as they have no hope of winning Democrats. They’ve already lost Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who wants steeper cuts. And Democrats are dialing up the heat on GOP attempts to cut energy funding in the Inflation Reduction Act, highlighting the 2022 law's economic and national security benefits.Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, led a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congre ... rcna206705

”Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., has also been warning against Medicaid cuts as the House bill seeks to impose work requirements and provider funding limits that have been panned by critics.
=17.55pxszsz“I will not support Medicaid benefit cuts,” Hawley told NBC News on Tuesday, adding that he has “concerns with pieces” of the House bill because of what it would mean to rural hospitals in his state.He later wrote on X: “I don’t want to see rural hospitals close their doors because funding got cut. I also don’t like the idea of a hidden tax on the working poor. That’s why I’m a NO on this House bill in its current form.”Hawley’s concerns are shared by Murkowski as well as Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who voted against the budget framework last month, citing concerns about Medicaid cuts harming her state.Another issue Senate Republicans want to revise are provisions that House Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., said would renew “the Federal Communications Commission’s spectrum auction authority and provide resources to modernize federal information-technology systems,” and save $88 billion.“I’ve had a chance to actually look at the language on the spectrum issue. It clearly has to be corrected,” said Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D.