Look at @*HooooeyVagina getting mathy with it.*Huey » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And that would be 82 million dollars on a billion dollars. Only a idiot would claim that is very little. I have to remember you are an idiot.
That's a lie.*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There's my Troll! Hey Cubicle, what ya got on the discussion? Oh, I forgot. You are a ****** who refuses to go on record with his stands.
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That's a lie.
I have already opined on the bill.
What is YOUR stand?
Mine is quite apparent.*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ My stand is quite apparent. I support the bill. Your turn, ******. The longer it take the more this post of yours is a lie.
Or, when you find your balls and you are within 35 miles of me (regardless of where you stay) we can discuss it in person. But that won't happen. You are nothing but a keyboard komando.
*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ My stand is quite apparent. I support the bill. Your turn, ******. The longer it take the more this post of yours is a lie.
Or, when you find your balls and you are within 35 miles of me (regardless of where you stay) we can discuss it in person. But that won't happen. You are nothing but a keyboard komando.
Or, when you find your balls and you are within 35 miles of me (regardless of where you stay)
8,000,000,000*Huey » 57 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And that would be 82 million dollars on a billion dollars. Only a idiot would claim that is very little. I have to remember you are an idiot.
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Mine is quite apparent.
I oppose it.
You are a consistent, toadying, enabler of Fiscal Profligacy..
I'm not.
*Huey » Today, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ And that would be 82 million dollars on a billion dollars. Only a idiot would claim that is very little. I have to remember you are an idiot.
Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Unless, of course, we're talking where I am, 43MilesShort&WideOpen
jerrab » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ it does not even count loop holes.
I would be fine if that is what they actually pay.
the laws are geared for the rich,*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Do you not take every deduction and loophole you legally can? If you do you are a **** hypocrite who want to live on the money of others.
****, stop support the massive spending. Cut **** spending, bitch.
Have a nice day, asshole, I'm out.
Does your sig acknowledge that you never came closer than 33 miles?*Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You are lying again. You admission is in my sig box. But, Even if I was two miles away, ArmsLength, you wouldn't do ****. You would make sure the house was locked and you would send my pic to cops.
You are a ****** like that.
*Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You are a good little progressive lefty ******* **** coward. But I got you on record. Dies your daughter know what a ****** lefty you are or is she as bad as you politically?
ArmsLength, you won't do ****.
It's literally EVERY SINGLE CONTEXT, every hour of the day.Dies your daughter know what a ****** lefty you are or is she as bad as you politically
That's what the last guy probably said to himself...ArmsLength, you won't do ****.
never say you are a christian ever again.*Huey » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Do you not take every deduction and loophole you legally can? If you do you are a **** hypocrite who want to live on the money of others.
****, stop support the massive spending. Cut **** spending, bitch.
Have a nice day, asshole, I'm out.
*Huey » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Do you not take every deduction and loophole you legally can? If you do you are a **** hypocrite who want to live on the money of others.
****, stop support the massive spending. Cut **** spending, bitch.
Have a nice day, asshole, I'm out.
Given Jesus' emphasis on caring for the poor and his critique of societal structures that perpetuate inequality, it is unlikely that he would support removing people from food stamps without addressing the underlying causes of poverty. It is improbable that Christ would take people off food stamps without providing alternative means of support or addressing the root causes of poverty. while we cannot know for certain what Jesus would do regarding modern welfare policies, his teachings suggest a strong emphasis on caring for the poor and vulnerable. Christians who support government welfare programs argue that these initiatives are a way to live out Jesus' teachings in a modern context.
*Huey » Today, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you not take every deduction and loophole you legally can? If you do you are a **** hypocrite who want to live on the money of others.
****, stop support the massive spending. Cut **** spending, bitch.
Have a nice day, asshole, I'm out.
Here is something we can actually agree on.