And obviously, Trump had a very worthwhile remedy, and one that I don't mind admitting was better than mine! Trump knew that the oil cargo ship owners would be WILLING to pay a small price to insure that those ships can continue making their multi-million dollar deliveries. And a Trump-hating moron like you can't stand it when President Trump finds a way to profit from his much-needed policies.Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ You stupid queer. You lied that he wasn't going to charge for it.
But I see in your **** copy-paste that purchasing insurance from the US "at a very reasonable price - SUCH A DEAL!" is part of the fantasy.
And it IS a fantasy - every bit as much as your jackoffing about how you ever ran more than your mouth and from a fight.
MOMFS, ****.
Here is what AI has to say about it:
Get with me when the number changes, fruitcake.
NOT WHEN THEY ESCORT ONE LONE TANKER, OR TWO, OR THREE.
When they take a meaningful bite out of the backlog, THEN run your dick kisser, sissy.
That's interest that YOU claim is a "fantasy"! And does nothing more than prove how deep your insane level of TDS goes!Search Assist
Some shipping companies have expressed interest in joining escorted convoys and are seeking clarification on how the U.S. plan will operate
Just imagine! A dope like you actually thought that you're smarter than President Trump and the entire US Dept. of War and can't believe that this scenario had already been conceived of and a remedy ready to go the moment it was needed.Chubb Leads $20 Billion U.S.-Backed Insurance Plan to Protect Shipping in the Strait of Hormuz
CNBC By Junia Wells March 12, 2026
Global insurer Chubb Limited has been selected as the lead underwriter for a major U.S. government-backed insurance initiative designed to protect commercial vessels navigating the volatile waters of the Strait of Hormuz.
The program, coordinated with the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, aims to restore confidence among shipping companies and tanker operators that have grown increasingly reluctant to transit the region following the outbreak of the Iran War.
Under the plan, the government-backed facility will provide up to $20 billion in reinsurance coverage on a rolling basis to protect vessels against war-related damages. The initiative represents one of the most significant emergency maritime insurance efforts in recent years, intended to stabilize global energy supply chains and ensure continued oil exports from the Persian Gulf.
Queer, profiting from a fire sale when YOU ARE THE ONE WHO SET THE FIRE is tralier park trashy. But then, so are you.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ And obviously, Trump had a very worthwhile remedy, and one that I don't mind admitting was better than mine! Trump knew that the oil cargo ship owners would be WILLING to pay a small price to insure that those ships can continue making their multi-million dollar deliveries. And a Trump-hating moron like you can't stand it when President Trump finds a way to profit from his much-needed policies.
Hide and watch, fruit basket.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ So tell me, asshole. Are you dumb enough to believe that those oil rich Middle East exports WON'T be happy to pay for such insurance from the US when oil prices are currently over $100 a barrel? Not much of a businessman, are you, dimwit? Obviously, there IS plenty of interest in doing so, much to your chagrin I'm sure!:
And YET AGAIN, fruitcake, get with me when the talk talk talk turns to action, and oil is stabilized beneath 90 bucks a bbl.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ That's interest that YOU claim is a "fantasy"! And does nothing more than prove how deep your insane level of TDS goes!
Need more proof?:
Oh, I never said I was SMARTER, you moron.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ Just imagine! A dope like you actually thought that you're smarter than President Trump and the entire US Dept. of War and can't believe that this scenario had already been conceived of and a remedy ready to go the moment it was needed.

Oil will be under $90 by the end of the month, dimwit. And maybe sooner!Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Queer, profiting from a fire sale when YOU ARE THE ONE WHO SET THE FIRE is tralier park trashy. But then, so are you.
Hide and watch, fruit basket.
And YET AGAIN, fruitcake, get with me when the talk talk talk turns to action, and oil is stabilized beneath 90 bucks a bbl.
Oh, I never said I was SMARTER, you moron.
Just not as evil - ya demon war-shipping goon.
Do YOU need more proof that trump has not destroyed Iran's military, you **** fruit?
Well heck, why WOULDN'T it be?Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Oil will be under $90 by the end of the month, dimwit. And maybe sooner!
You breed 'em . We have to read 'emCannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Well heck, why WOULDN'T it be?
Heck, Iran's military is completely destroyed.
You ignit maroon.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The boy is thick in the head.JohnnyYou » 15 Mar 2026, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You breed 'em . We have to read 'em
Boozekill is up there for the Golden Toilet Achievement Award for Best in Stupidity.
YOU'RE the dope who claims that it's nothing but talk!Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Well heck, why WOULDN'T it be?
Heck, Iran's military is completely destroyed.
You ignit maroon.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No, fruitcake. I said it's an obvious lie. If Iran's military were destroyed, the straight of hor mooze would not be backed up with nearly a thousand vessels.
Do you see them doing it, fruity pebbles?Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ And you still think other countries will be afraid to go through the Strait?
I'm not the one lying about reality, fruitcake. That's the orange pedophile whose name is ALL OVER the epstein files.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Is everyone in your family as big a frightened ****** as you are?
Well, I PROVED it, kicking YOUR dumb *** according to YOUR OWN challenge that YOU demanded to approve of! So YEAH I get pissed off when you continue to lie about that fact!Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ The boy is thick in the head.
He gets really pissed when I don't believe he ran 5 successful businesses.
Hey, i WILL be the first to agree that success in business is perfectly possible by c-students who apply themselves. I've seen it happen.
But he is no c-student. He's a **** idiot.
You managed to buffalo a weakling.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, I PROVED it, kicking YOUR dumb *** according to YOUR OWN challenge that YOU demanded to approve of! So YEAH I get pissed off when you continue to lie about that fact!
Need more proof? There's nothing I enjoy more than exposing you for the wrongheaded, jealous failure you are, so why don't you want a redo of your challenge for the newcomers here, ******?
So why are you afraid to post the context of where Trump's name is in the Epstein file, asshole?Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ No, fruitcake. I said it's an obvious lie. If Iran's military were destroyed, the straight of hor mooze would not be backed up with nearly a thousand vessels.
Do you see them doing it, fruity pebbles?
I'm not the one lying about reality, fruitcake. That's the orange pedophile whose name is ALL OVER the epstein files.
Didn't you approve of Roadkill as the 3rd party mediator that I sent the pile of evidence to proving my career?Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ You managed to buffalo a weakling.
I cannot imagine ever believing someone as stupid as you ran one business - much less 5.
"Context," fruitcake?Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ So why are you afraid to post the context of where Trump's name is in the Epstein file, asshole?
No, it was the rapes. Not that other stuff.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you think Trump committed a crime by throwing Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago when he was found soliciting the females working there?
That is ****. Whoever told you that committed tard abuse.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Or did your weak brain forget the fact that EVERY ONE of the Epstein survivors AND Bubba Clinton all stated unequivocally that Trump HAD NEVER been to Epstein Island or traveled on the plane?
Is that who it was? I knew it was someone weak that you buffaloed.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Didn't you approve of Roadkill as the 3rd party mediator that I sent the pile of evidence to proving my career?
Now you want to try and deny it, scumbag?
But you're afraid of another ***-kicking, aren't you?
So where's that accusation, dickhead? Who made it and what evidence do you have, liar?Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ "Context," fruitcake?
You mean CONTEXTS. He is all over there, dipwad.
No, it was the rapes. Not that other stuff.
That is ****. Whoever told you that committed tard abuse.
Epstein Survivors Demand Release of Files; Tell NBC News They’ve Never Seen or Heard of Trump ‘Doing Anything Inappropriate’
By Debra Heine September 3, 2025
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse told NBC News that they had never seen or heard of President Donald Trump engaging in inappropriate activity during the years they were being trafficked by the late disgraced financier.
NBC News host Hallie Jackson spoke with six survivors and three siblings of the late Virginia Giuffre, for an exclusive interview that aired Tuesday night. Guiffre, one of the most prominent and vocal accusers of Jeffrey Epstein, committed suicide on April 25, 2025.
“Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as related to Jeffrey Epstein?” Jackson asked the group.Without hesitation, several of the women responded, “no.”
Believe it now, dickhead?Bill Clinton Said He Has 'No Information' That Donald Trump Was Involved in Epstein's Crimes, but Trump 'Did Know Him Well'
The former president was called to testify before members of Congress last week about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein
By Meredith Kile March 3, 2026
NEED TO KNOW
- Bill Clinton testified before members of Congress on Friday about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein
- During his deposition, Clinton was asked about Donald Trump and said he never saw anything that made him believe Trump was involved with Epstein's alleged crimes
Did you approve of him or not?Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that who it was? I knew it was someone weak that you buffaloed.
The evidence is his lies.Zeets2 » 15 Mar 2026, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ So where's that accusation, dickhead? Who made it and what evidence do you have, liar?
So where are YOUR links to your own ****, numbnuts?Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2026, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ The evidence is his lies.
He literally ran on a promise to release those files - and then his OWN PARTY had to turn against him and join the democ rats in issuing legislation to FORCE the pedophile to release those files. And still he has not done so. He's skeered. He's in there. His violation of his word and his violation of the law is all the proof any reasonable person requires.
You unsourced copy-paste is meaningless to me. Cherry picked testimony is equally meaningless. There ARE women saying trump raped them as girls. And his hiding of the files is strongly suggestive he has something to hide.
Learn how links work, fruit.
Does this give you a rise in your Levi's ?Zeets2 » 16 Mar 2026, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ So where are YOUR links to your own ****, numbnuts?
The Epstein survivors HAVE REPEATED OFTEN that Trump WAS NEVER SEEN ON EPSTEIN ISLAND, nor is there ANY evidence that Trump was ever on his plane! Now, if you've got links that PROVE your idiotic claims of rape committed by Trump, THEN POST IT, DICKHEAD! The fact is you've got NOTHING but the words of Trump haters like yourself spewing lies about him as they've done virtually every day for the past 10 years, and they count on gullible saps like YOU to spread them further!
Furthermore, Trump HAS released over 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files and NONE of them implicate him in ANY crime whatsoever!
There are valid reasons that prevent the release of some that are remaining, but you can't provide a single reason why either Obama or Biden didn't release them IF they actually implicated Trump in any crime!
Can even a Trump-hating dope like you explain that?