Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

56 minutes ago

So??

Looks like a GREAT TIME to be in bonds. Seeing how the PRICES will be DOWN CONSIDERABLLY!!

Sucks huh that SMART INVESTORS are going to jump all over this TEMPORARY rate hike with LOWER PRICES and higher yields! That's because you are a STUPID PIECE OF **** that has no real clue how temporary this really is!!

Just think, in 6 months, when the rates are LOW AGAIN, I'll have an even MORE valuable asset whereas you have NOTHING but more TDS!!

!!

*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:57 am

Are you chimping and screeching about losing your  SNAP....entitlement... 'nsheet...?     
How many other GIBS ME DAT PROGRAMS did you just have taken away from you.... 'nsheet...?   

-----------------------------------
Increased National DebtThe Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would add $3.8 trillion to the national debt, exacerbating the existing $36 trillion debt burden [2]. This could lead to higher interest rates, making borrowing more expensive for individuals, businesses, and the government.Higher Interest Rates and Borrowing CostsAs investors become increasingly wary of the US debt, they may demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk. This could result in higher borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit card debt, affecting consumers and businesses alike [3]. "The reason everyday Americans should care about fiscal sustainability is this is a long-running cost of living issue," said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale [4].   
 

jerrab » Today, 1:51 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:51 am

----------------------------  A budget bill by the U.S. House of Representatives contains a “stunning” provision that would limit federal courts’ ability to hold government officials and other litigants in contempt for disobeying their orders, according to Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean at the University of California at Berkeley School of Law.The provision should be rejected as “a terrible idea,” wrote Chemerinsky, an ABA Journal contributor, at Just Security via Executive Functions.

Your copy-paste says it is "stunning." Clearly, you agree; you were stunned.

The smartest person in this conversation was NOT stunned. It follows as a perfectly necessary thing - not stunning at all. 

"When judges exhibit consistent abusive behaviors which over-reach to control foreign policy against the democratic will of the electorate, it is incumbent upon the Legislature todecisively limit the power of the judiciary until such time as rebellious judges can be effectively censured." - what you hit reply to but failed to respond to other than a lame and irrelevant copy-paste.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:37 pm

There's no point in debating imbeciles who insist words don't mean what they say.

I know.  That’s why many are Not getting into it with you.

You could take a stand on the op ya **** retard.

jerrab » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

-----------------------------------
Increased National DebtThe Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would add $3.8 trillion to the national debt, exacerbating the existing $36 trillion debt burden [2]. This could lead to higher interest rates, making borrowing more expensive for individuals, businesses, and the government.Higher Interest Rates and Borrowing CostsAs investors become increasingly wary of the US debt, they may demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk. This could result in higher borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit card debt, affecting consumers and businesses alike [3]. "The reason everyday Americans should care about fiscal sustainability is this is a long-running cost of living issue," said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale [4].

I know what the final vote count was for this bill.
How many GIBS ME DAT PROGRAMS did you just lose out on...?........  
 
 

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

I know.  That’s why many are Not getting into it with you.

You could take a stand on the op ya **** retard.

Tiny,

Don't oblige me to feed you more of your words.

You could take a stand on the op ya **** retard

I have, **** idiot.

 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I know what the final vote count was for this bill.
It is quite obvious you don't....otherwise you wouldn't be putting all of the blame  on Trump........

Post the first step in the Federal Budget Process...

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

I know.  That’s why many are Not getting into it with you.

You could take a stand on the op ya **** retard.

Tiny,

Don't oblige me to feed you more of your words.

You could take a stand on the op ya **** retard

I have, **** idiot.

 

 

No, you haven’t.  You posted us your usual nonsensical diverting ****.  Don’t you or do you not support the dems voting against this bill.

Tale a  **** stand, ******.  

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Post the first step in the Federal Budget Process...

Either stand up like a man and say what you mean to say like a man  or else STFU you draft dodging ****** Bitch.....  
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I know what the final vote count was for this bill.
How many GIBS ME DAT PROGRAMS did you just lose out on...?........

are you cheering on the financial ruin of the country?

how  patriotic of you.

 

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

No, you haven’t.  You posted us your usual nonsensical diverting ****.  Don’t you or do you not support the dems voting against this bill.

Tale a  **** stand, ******.

i support everyone who voted against this bill that will bankrupt this country.

jerrab » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

are you cheering on the financial ruin of the country?

how  patriotic of you.

Listen to  Illegal Alien loving POS Traitor and serial liar  jerrab lecture me about patriotism.....  

"The legislation would make permanent the individual income and estate tax cuts passed during Trump's first term and add fresh exemptions for tipped income, overtime pay, and interest on certain auto loans—moves designed to appeal to working-class voters.To help offset the anticipated revenue shortfall, estimated at roughly $3.8 trillion, the bill would repeal or fast-track the expiration of clean energy tax credits enacted under President Joe Biden. That rollback would substantially reduce the net cost of the package."      

*Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

No, you haven’t.  You posted us your usual nonsensical diverting ****.  Don’t you or do you not support the dems voting against this bill.

Tale a  **** stand, ******.

the  results of this bill.

------------------------------------

Increased National Debt The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would add $3.8 trillion to the national debt, exacerbating the existing $36 trillion debt burden [2]. This could lead to higher interest rates, making borrowing more expensive for individuals, businesses, and the government.Higher Interest Rates and Borrowing CostsAs investors become increasingly wary of the US debt, they may demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk. This could result in higher borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit card debt, affecting consumers and businesses alike [3]. "The reason everyday Americans should care about fiscal sustainability is this is a long-running cost of living issue," said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale [4].   
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Listen to  Illegal Alien loving POS Traitor and serial liar  jerrab lecture me about patriotism.....  

"The legislation would make permanent the individual income and estate tax cuts passed during Trump's first term and add fresh exemptions for tipped income, overtime pay, and interest on certain auto loans—moves designed to appeal to working-class voters.To help offset the anticipated revenue shortfall, estimated at roughly $3.8 trillion, the bill would repeal or fast-track the expiration of clean energy tax credits enacted under President Joe Biden. That rollback would substantially reduce the net cost of the package."    

don't even pretend you are patriotic.

you want the country to go bankrupt.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Increased National Debt The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would add $3.8 trillion to the national debt, exacerbating the existing $36 trillion debt burden [2]. This could lead to higher interest rates, making borrowing more expensive for individuals, businesses, and the government. Higher Interest Rates and Borrowing Costs As investors become increasingly wary of the US debt, they may demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk. This could result in higher borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit card debt, affecting consumers and businesses alike [3]. "The reason everyday Americans should care about fiscal sustainability is this is a long-running cost of living issue," said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale [4].   

jerrab » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

the  results of this bill.

------------------------------------

Increased National Debt The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would add $3.8 trillion to the national debt, exacerbating the existing $36 trillion debt burden [2]. This could lead to higher interest rates, making borrowing more expensive for individuals, businesses, and the government.Higher Interest Rates and Borrowing CostsAs investors become increasingly wary of the US debt, they may demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk. This could result in higher borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit card debt, affecting consumers and businesses alike [3]. "The reason everyday Americans should care about fiscal sustainability is this is a long-running cost of living issue," said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale [4].

Got it.  You support the largest tax increase in history.  Got it.  I see words like " estimate" and "could"..

jerrab » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

i support everyone who voted against this bill that will bankrupt this country.

And the scare tactics begin.  I guess you are a SOK of BV.  

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

And the scare tactics begin.  I guess you are a SOK of BV.

you are a soc of someone very stupid.
------------------------------------There is also a risk of a broader financial crisis if investor confidence in U.S. Treasuries wanes. Some economists have likened this situation to potential scenarios seen in countries like Greece or Portugal, where excessive debt led to severe economic turmoil[8]. The recent downgrade of the U.S.'s credit rating by Moody's reflects growing concerns about fiscal discipline and sustainability under current policies[9].In summary, while proponents of Trump's bill argue it will stimulate economic growth through tax cuts and deregulation, many experts believe that its long-term effects could be detrimental. The combination of increased national debt, rising interest rates, cuts to essential services for vulnerable populations, and potential loss of investor confidence suggests that the Trump bill has significant potential to financially ruin the country if enacted without substantial modifications.

jerrab » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

you are a soc of someone very stupid.
------------------------------------There is also a risk of a broader financial crisis if investor confidence in U.S. Treasuries wanes. Some economists have likened this situation to potential scenarios seen in countries like Greece or Portugal, where excessive debt led to severe economic turmoil[8]. The recent downgrade of the U.S.'s credit rating by Moody's reflects growing concerns about fiscal discipline and sustainability under current policies[9].In summary, while proponents of Trump's bill argue it will stimulate economic growth through tax cuts and deregulation, many experts believe that its long-term effects could be detrimental. The combination of increased national debt, rising interest rates, cuts to essential services for vulnerable populations, and potential loss of investor confidence suggests that the Trump bill has significant potential to financially ruin the country if enacted without substantial modifications.

Add potential to the list......

Well, at least you have the balls to answer. I asked BV, not you.  And even this daughter knows he is the ball less wonder.

jerrab » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

don't even pretend you are patriotic.

you want the country to go bankrupt.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Increased National Debt The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would add $3.8 trillion to the national debt, exacerbating the existing $36 trillion debt burden [2]. This could lead to higher interest rates, making borrowing more expensive for individuals, businesses, and the government. Higher Interest Rates and Borrowing Costs As investors become increasingly wary of the US debt, they may demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk. This could result in higher borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit card debt, affecting consumers and businesses alike [3]. "The reason everyday Americans should care about fiscal sustainability is this is a long-running cost of living issue," said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale [4].

Listen to  Illegal Alien loving POS Traitor and serial liar  jerrab lecture me about patriotism.....   

"The legislation would make permanent the individual income and estate tax cuts passed during Trump's first term and add fresh exemptions for tipped income, overtime pay, and interest on certain auto loans—moves designed to appeal to working-class voters.To help offset the anticipated revenue shortfall, estimated at roughly $3.8 trillion, the bill would repeal or fast-track the expiration of clean energy tax credits enacted under President Joe Biden. That rollback would substantially reduce the net cost of the package."     
 

jerrab » Yesterday, 11:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:57 pm

he posted it. I am just the messenger.

trump said he would evict everyone from gaza and make a rivera, this from someone who has hotels across the world.

Yeah, you'd MUCH rather maintain slums in Gaza like these for the NEXT 80 years as well rather than have beautiful resorts and a thriving business community, right?:




Even a Jew-hating dunce like you should be able to see the potential of having modern resorts and a Mediterranean Riviera on the Gaza shores instead of the slums and decay there that we've become accustomed to, wouldn't you?

NAH! 
Jewish hatred is as bad as TDS, and foolish libs like you are infected with both!