Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:09 pm

3 of 4 have absolutely nothing to do with my definition.

Stop fishing for help. I am not helping you this time. Cannon and Huey didn't need any help.

On the very off chance that you answer (which we both know that you won't) I will give an explanation as to why you are either correct or incorrect. Additionally, I will give an explanation as to why your definition fits all options. 

Also, I expect you to give an account as to why you chose your answer. This gives way to any guesswork. 

Vegas » 24 May 2025, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:36 pm

Stop fishing for help. I am not helping you this time. Cannon and Huey didn't need any help.

On the very off chance that you answer (which we both know that you won't) I will give an explanation as to why you are either correct or incorrect. Additionally, I will give an explanation as to why your definition fits all options. 

Also, I expect you to give an account as to why you chose your answer. This gives way to any guesswork.

To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image   I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him. 
  @Blackvegetable I will never let you live this gem down. Survivorship bias = dead presidents. Image  
 Tell everyone how Survivorship bias affected the results of the APSA survey

Cannonpointer » 24 May 2025, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 8:37 pm

Nor you, gender confused one.

You had a mail order bride who got knocked up the a *** mailman and made you pay for the result. :)
 

Wasn't that plot in a movie? Think Jim Carry was in it.

Cannonpointer » 24 May 2025, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:32 pm

False. Every tikme I went for sympathy sex, I **** it up by crying about have an STD or by pretending to be retarded.

I never mastered the strategy.

Greenies for trying to make me believe "pretending"...


 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 5:00 pm

You've already forgotten that I reminded you earlier why I ask.

As you insist on going there...

Are any of your children graduates of a top engineering program?

Are any of them fluent in 3 languages?

Are any of them not homely and fat?

They all have something you don’t.  Intelligence and common sense.

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:38 am

They all have something you don’t.  Intelligence and common sense.

That settles that...


 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:59 am

That settles that...

Not quite sure what you think you settled.
 

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 8:01 am

Not quite sure what you think you settled.

You wouldn't. 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 8:12 am

You wouldn't.

You are off on another tangent.  You suffer from Joe Biden Syndrome.  Your mind is gone.

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 8:18 am

You are off on another tangent.  You suffer from Joe Biden Syndrome.  Your mind is gone.

I'm inclined to believe that it's about your Stupid.

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 8:44 am

I'm inclined to believe that it's about your Stupid.

Like Biden you suffer dementia.  

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 8:46 am

Like Biden you suffer dementia.

So you assert...

But you struggle to temember your own words.

You are easily confused, but even more easily triggered.
 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 8:58 am

So you assert...

But you struggle to temember your own words.

You are easily confused, but even more easily triggered.

I have no struggle remembering my own words.  As far as confusion and recall issues you are the idiot that asks the same questions over and over

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:59 am

That settles that...


 

Always has and you won't accept it.

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 9:05 am

I have no struggle remembering my own words.  As far as confusion and recall issues you are the idiot that asks the same questions over and over

Only because you can't remember your own words...haunting...


Taunting....

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 9:14 am

Only because you can't remember your own words...haunting...

Taunting....

I Remeber them, dementia boy.  What I don’t do is play your 20 questions diversion game with questions you always ask or your stupid “are these your words”.  Well that is another sign of your confusion because you forget when someone’s name is on the link it is their words.

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 9:18 am

I Remeber them, dementia boy.  What I don’t do is play your 20 questions diversion game with questions you always ask or your stupid “are these your words”.  Well that is another sign of your confusion because you forget when someone’s name is on the link it is their words.

Notice how you yap, vaguely.

I post evidence. 

For example 

Well that is another sign of your confusion because you forget when someone’s name is on the link it is their words.

Yesterday I explained to you, again, why I oblige you to confirm your words.


What did I tell you?

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 9:27 am

Notice how you yap, vaguely.

I post evidence. 

For example 



Yesterday I explained to you, again, why I oblige you to confirm your words.


What did I tell you?

You don't tell anyone anything reciting what everyone else does or doesn't do for your ideal lifestyle cradle to grave.

You are lost on the promise path of better tomorrows living eternally separated with personal heartbeats forward now. Your brain navigates time like there never was a tomorrow, dawn to dusk.

Rhetorical question, when does tomorrow legally begin as compared to your time beginning to live one of a kind so far, day in and day out?
time separation between two interpretations of PC.

Political Correctness cradle to grave vs Personally Conceived specific conception to decomposed evolving here now.

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 8:26 pm

Post my definition.

you want HIM to post YOUR definition, you stupid **** bastard? kill yourself...
 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 9:27 am

Notice how you yap, vaguely.

I post evidence. 

For example 

Yesterday I explained to you, again, why I oblige you to confirm your words.

What did I tell you?

If you can't recall what you told I suggest you look it up yourself.  And then when you find where your Being about me running tell us what my reply was.



This conversation is boring me.