Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 9:55 am

Why?

Because you're so tough?

Show us your "decapitation move"........  

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:18 am

Greenies for trying to make me believe "pretending"...

         

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:38 am

They all have something you don’t.  Intelligence and common sense.

ESPECIALLY common sense. He doesn't even WANT any!

31stArrival » 25 May 2025, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:07 am

Wasn't that plot in a movie? Think Jim Carry was in it.

             
 

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 11:19 am

Tsk, Tsk...as usual your demands are rejected.

Earning the @* tunic, every day.

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 11:39 am

Earning the @* tunic, every day.

You never did produce that pic.  You are such a liar.  If you were man enough to admit you were wrong about the pic that it never existed, you wouldn't be reminded of your of memory, NoRecall.

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 11:42 am

You never did produce that pic.  You are such a liar.  If you were man enough to admit you were wrong about the pic that it never existed, you wouldn't be reminded of your of memory, NoRecall.

Covered that yesterday.

What did I tell you?
 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 12:11 pm

Covered that yesterday.

What did I tell you?

You made up some excuse that I rapidly debunked.  The pic never existed and you are not man enough to admit it.  And remember my reply.  You always leave that out because you are a dishonest prick.

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 12:16 pm

You made up some excuse that I rapidly debunked.  The pic never existed and you are not man enough to admit it.  And remember my reply.  You always leave that out because you are a dishonest prick.

Your recall really sucks.


 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 12:17 pm

Your recall really sucks.

Nah, ******,the pic never existed.  And the site crashed MONTHS after you lied about.  Oh, don't forget one of your DUMBEST comments of all time is also on that thread.n "...is that a gun, in pieces?"  No ****, it was a Kydex holster.
 

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 12:20 pm

Nah, ******,the pic never existed.  And the site crashed MONTHS after you lied about.  Oh, don't forget one of your DUMBEST comments of all time is also on that thread.n "...is that a gun, in pieces?"  No ****, it was a Kydex holster.

But the tunic does....

How would I know about it?

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 12:21 pm

But the tunic does....

How would I know about it?

There is no such pic.  Stop reaching.  Once you admit there was no such pic, that you lied, and we can move on.  But that entails you taking the first step in becoming a man and admitting you were wrong.  

*Huey » 25 May 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 12:23 pm

There is no such pic.  Stop reaching.  Once you admit there was no such pic, that you lied, and we can move on.  But that entails you taking the first step in becoming a man and admitting you were wrong.

The tunic exists.


How do I know about it?

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 12:43 pm

The tunic exists.

How do I know about it?

There is no such pic.  Stop reaching.  Once you admit there was no such pic, that you lied, and we can move on.  But that entails you taking the first step in becoming a man and admitting you were wrong.

Admit it.  1..2...3...See BV run.

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 6:34 am

To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image   I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him.  @Blackvegetable I will never let you live this gem down. Survivorship bias = dead presidents. Image  Tell everyone how Survivorship bias affected the results of the APSA survey

          Your stalling won't protect you. Nothing will. 



Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 9:46 am

one is my definition, in my own words 

The other is it's classification.

This is why you should never stop picking your nose while scratching your *** to comment.

brown, you stupid **** bastard, how would anyone know that?       
 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 9:55 am

Why?

Because you're so tough?

no, because....





nod...

*GHETTOBLASTER » 25 May 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 11:22 am

Show us your "decapitation move"........

 

ROG62 » 25 May 2025, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 1:39 pm

What made the "Psycho" character in the movie "STRIPES" so funny is we all grew up knowing at least one.....  
https://youtu.be/iN-aXzpQUdw?si=84Z7KDC59kAs8tdT

ROG62 » 25 May 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 1:36 pm

brown, you stupid **** bastard, how would anyone know that?     

by reading Vegas' crap.

Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

I swear, no one does.