Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 8:32 am

Roger,

Did I answer your question?

so, you're stating democrats dumping north of $4 trillion into the US economy had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT?
 

*Huey » 24 May 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:11 am

Because I Have in the past, dumb ****.  I guess your recall really sucks.  Don't ever presume to question mine again.  

On the Democratic reaction to George Clooney's New York Times op-ed, which called for Biden to drop out of the presidential race

 They were shocked. After the debate everybody was talking about, "Who's going to say it?" Because very few people were coming forward publicly, even though the voters were clear and many members of the media were clear, a lot of Democratic officials kept quiet. … [The op-ed] had a huge impact because here's a guy [Clooney] who co-hosted the most successful Democratic fundraiser in presidential history. Thirty million dollars raised in one night. Here's a beloved figure who would only make enemies. You can only make enemies from such a thing. And he came out and he was gutsier here then most senators and governors and members of the House.

Following the 687 consecutive day of Braintree Coward Theater....


 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:27 am

Following the 687 consecutive day of Braintree Coward Theater....

It seems that virus is back on your device. Thanks Try again, Cowardly Too Far.

Because I Have in the past, dumb ****.  I guess your recall really sucks.  Don't ever presume to question mine again.  

On the Democratic reaction to George Clooney's New York Times op-ed, which called for Biden to drop out of the presidential race

 They were shocked. After the debate everybody was talking about, "Who's going to say it?" Because very few people were coming forward publicly, even though the voters were clear and many members of the media were clear, a lot of Democratic officials kept quiet. … [The op-ed] had a huge impact because here's a guy [Clooney] who co-hosted the most successful Democratic fundraiser in presidential history. Thirty million dollars raised in one night. Here's a beloved figure who would only make enemies. You can only make enemies from such a thing. And he came out and he was gutsier here then most senators and governors and members of the House.
 

*Huey » 24 May 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:28 am

It seems 

you keep running from the question. 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 8:36 am

And finally, the last of that article.  Remember, he is one of those who tells you what to think.

On the public's lack of trust in legacy media
 The news media is in a crisis. … Reporters in general, CNN, NPR, ABC, CBS, all of us, people don't trust us. One of the reasons they don't trust us is what just happened with Joe Biden and his acuity and the fact that we in the media were pretty late to the story. I should [say], we in the legacy media were late to that story, because conservative media was not late to it. And I think that we are in an existential fight for a free press. Not that it's gonna be taken away, but it certainly runs the risk of not thriving as it has. And that just calls on us to be as good and professional as possible.
 Sam Briger and Thea Chaloner produced and edited this interview for broadcast. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Meghan Sullivan adapted it for the web.

*Huey » 24 May 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:48 am

And finally, the last of that article.  Remember, he is one of those who tells you what to think.

On the public's lack of trust in legacy media
 The news media is in a crisis. … Reporters in general, CNN, NPR, ABC, CBS, all of us, people don't trust us. One of the reasons they don't trust us is what just happened with Joe Biden and his acuity and the fact that we in the media were pretty late to the story. I should [say], we in the legacy media were late to that story, because conservative media was not late to it. And I think that we are in an existential fight for a free press. Not that it's gonna be taken away, but it certainly runs the risk of not thriving as it has. And that just calls on us to be as good and professional as possible.
 Sam Briger and Thea Chaloner produced and edited this interview for broadcast. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Meghan Sullivan adapted it for the web.

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:48 am

you keep running from the question.

Why is it you can only make a point by editing someone else's quote?  Pretty **** if you ask me.

Anyway, I can't run from this.  I have already answered it.  A couple of times.  Your recall truly sucks. Let me know when you remember. 

But hey, you voted for this:

https://youtu.be/yDBRhKBLfqQ?si=1MWHgnrSNdaCi1MW



 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:51 am

Nobody gives a **** about that any more, ******.  People are more concerned with who was running the country the past few years.

https://youtu.be/LtqiLobIJnU?si=eap-14waDWLOTEUW

Have you noticed that you post the same few events over and over.  I have posted different examples today.

Plus, I know you don't recall 9yor recall sucks) but I condemned Jan 6th participants.

What else you got?  Is Jan 6th all you and the daughter discuss when she is forced to spend time with you?

 

*Huey » 24 May 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 10:00 am

Nobody gives a **** about that any more, ******.  People 

which brings us back to what I told you at the beginning. 


You are being told what "people give a **** about"..

 

*Huey » 24 May 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 9:55 am

Why is it you can only make a point by editing someone else's quote?  

I'm not editing.

I'm ignoring what isn't an answer.

I have no reason to read it.

*Huey » 24 May 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 10:00 am

Nobody gives a **** about that any more, ******.  People are more concerned with who was running the country the past few years.

https://youtu.be/LtqiLobIJnU?si=eap-14waDWLOTEUW

Have you noticed that you post the same few events over and over.  I have posted different examples today.

Plus, I know you don't recall 9yor recall sucks) but I condemned Jan 6th participants.

What else you got?  Is Jan 6th all you and the daughter discuss when she is forced to spend time with you?

Still melting.

 

*Beekeeper » 24 May 2025, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 6:55 am

Your TDS is massive today, DICKSUCK!!

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg

NAME THE "Leaker" and then you MIGHT have something, but this kind of **** is why no one cares what the **** you think you have.

RUN, ASSHOLE, RUN!!!

Who owns the plane that the Qutar prince "gave Trump"??

The thread title is ironic considering Bv's history.     

roadkill » 24 May 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 10:09 am

The thread title is ironic considering Bv's history.   

Of what?

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 10:07 am

Still melting.

I love twofers. 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 6:48 am

According to the Times, Kent pushed officials to edit the intelligence study about whether the administration could justify the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to a brutal prison in El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used 18th-century wartime law, by linking the Tren de Aragua gang to the Venezuelan government....
The original analysis reportedly contradicted the Trump administration’s claim that the Tren de Aragua gang is controlled by the Venezuelan government and has been ordered to commit crimes inside the United States.

 To shield the administration from political blowback, Kent allegedly urged edits to the report.

 “We need to do some rewriting” and more analytic work “so this document is not used against the DNI or POTUS,” Kent wrote in an email on April 3 to a group of intelligence officials, the newspaper reported.

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?ur ... nst-trump/

People so **** stupid they must have been born to be grifted.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.
When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
or
"Sampling error"
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 10:28 am

Of what?



 

It's a secret.

Vegas » 24 May 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 11:01 am

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.
When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
or
"Sampling error"
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Which of those words did you copy and paste?
 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 5:08 pm

Which of those words did you copy and paste?

Still \too afraid to answer.        Keep stalling, coward. It won't protect you.



Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Vegas » 24 May 2025, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 8:11 pm

Still \too afraid to answer.        Keep stalling, coward. It won't protect you.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***.

Break this down for me..



To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image   I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him. 

Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

24 May 2025, 10:04 am

which brings us back to what I told you at the beginning. 

You are being told what "people give a **** about"..

and you aren't?