Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

55 minutes ago

Roger,

Did I answer your question?

so, you're stating democrats dumping north of $4 trillion into the US economy had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT?
 

*Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Because I Have in the past, dumb ****.  I guess your recall really sucks.  Don't ever presume to question mine again.  

On the Democratic reaction to George Clooney's New York Times op-ed, which called for Biden to drop out of the presidential race

 They were shocked. After the debate everybody was talking about, "Who's going to say it?" Because very few people were coming forward publicly, even though the voters were clear and many members of the media were clear, a lot of Democratic officials kept quiet. … [The op-ed] had a huge impact because here's a guy [Clooney] who co-hosted the most successful Democratic fundraiser in presidential history. Thirty million dollars raised in one night. Here's a beloved figure who would only make enemies. You can only make enemies from such a thing. And he came out and he was gutsier here then most senators and governors and members of the House.

Following the 687 consecutive day of Braintree Coward Theater....


 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Following the 687 consecutive day of Braintree Coward Theater....

It seems that virus is back on your device. Thanks Try again, Cowardly Too Far.

Because I Have in the past, dumb ****.  I guess your recall really sucks.  Don't ever presume to question mine again.  

On the Democratic reaction to George Clooney's New York Times op-ed, which called for Biden to drop out of the presidential race

 They were shocked. After the debate everybody was talking about, "Who's going to say it?" Because very few people were coming forward publicly, even though the voters were clear and many members of the media were clear, a lot of Democratic officials kept quiet. … [The op-ed] had a huge impact because here's a guy [Clooney] who co-hosted the most successful Democratic fundraiser in presidential history. Thirty million dollars raised in one night. Here's a beloved figure who would only make enemies. You can only make enemies from such a thing. And he came out and he was gutsier here then most senators and governors and members of the House.
 

*Huey » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

It seems 

you keep running from the question. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:36 am

And finally, the last of that article.  Remember, he is one of those who tells you what to think.

On the public's lack of trust in legacy media
 The news media is in a crisis. … Reporters in general, CNN, NPR, ABC, CBS, all of us, people don't trust us. One of the reasons they don't trust us is what just happened with Joe Biden and his acuity and the fact that we in the media were pretty late to the story. I should [say], we in the legacy media were late to that story, because conservative media was not late to it. And I think that we are in an existential fight for a free press. Not that it's gonna be taken away, but it certainly runs the risk of not thriving as it has. And that just calls on us to be as good and professional as possible.
 Sam Briger and Thea Chaloner produced and edited this interview for broadcast. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Meghan Sullivan adapted it for the web.

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

And finally, the last of that article.  Remember, he is one of those who tells you what to think.

On the public's lack of trust in legacy media
 The news media is in a crisis. … Reporters in general, CNN, NPR, ABC, CBS, all of us, people don't trust us. One of the reasons they don't trust us is what just happened with Joe Biden and his acuity and the fact that we in the media were pretty late to the story. I should [say], we in the legacy media were late to that story, because conservative media was not late to it. And I think that we are in an existential fight for a free press. Not that it's gonna be taken away, but it certainly runs the risk of not thriving as it has. And that just calls on us to be as good and professional as possible.
 Sam Briger and Thea Chaloner produced and edited this interview for broadcast. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Meghan Sullivan adapted it for the web.

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

you keep running from the question.

Why is it you can only make a point by editing someone else's quote?  Pretty **** if you ask me.

Anyway, I can't run from this.  I have already answered it.  A couple of times.  Your recall truly sucks. Let me know when you remember. 

But hey, you voted for this:

https://youtu.be/yDBRhKBLfqQ?si=1MWHgnrSNdaCi1MW



 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Nobody gives a **** about that any more, ******.  People are more concerned with who was running the country the past few years.

https://youtu.be/LtqiLobIJnU?si=eap-14waDWLOTEUW

Have you noticed that you post the same few events over and over.  I have posted different examples today.

Plus, I know you don't recall 9yor recall sucks) but I condemned Jan 6th participants.

What else you got?  Is Jan 6th all you and the daughter discuss when she is forced to spend time with you?

 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Nobody gives a **** about that any more, ******.  People 

which brings us back to what I told you at the beginning. 


You are being told what "people give a **** about"..

 

*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Why is it you can only make a point by editing someone else's quote?  

I'm not editing.

I'm ignoring what isn't an answer.

I have no reason to read it.

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Nobody gives a **** about that any more, ******.  People are more concerned with who was running the country the past few years.

https://youtu.be/LtqiLobIJnU?si=eap-14waDWLOTEUW

Have you noticed that you post the same few events over and over.  I have posted different examples today.

Plus, I know you don't recall 9yor recall sucks) but I condemned Jan 6th participants.

What else you got?  Is Jan 6th all you and the daughter discuss when she is forced to spend time with you?

Still melting.

 

*Beekeeper » Today, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:55 am

Your TDS is massive today, DICKSUCK!!

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg

NAME THE "Leaker" and then you MIGHT have something, but this kind of **** is why no one cares what the **** you think you have.

RUN, ASSHOLE, RUN!!!

Who owns the plane that the Qutar prince "gave Trump"??

The thread title is ironic considering Bv's history.     

roadkill » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

The thread title is ironic considering Bv's history.   

Of what?

Blackvegetable » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

Still melting.

I love twofers. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:48 am

According to the Times, Kent pushed officials to edit the intelligence study about whether the administration could justify the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to a brutal prison in El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used 18th-century wartime law, by linking the Tren de Aragua gang to the Venezuelan government....
The original analysis reportedly contradicted the Trump administration’s claim that the Tren de Aragua gang is controlled by the Venezuelan government and has been ordered to commit crimes inside the United States.

 To shield the administration from political blowback, Kent allegedly urged edits to the report.

 “We need to do some rewriting” and more analytic work “so this document is not used against the DNI or POTUS,” Kent wrote in an email on April 3 to a group of intelligence officials, the newspaper reported.

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?ur ... nst-trump/

People so **** stupid they must have been born to be grifted.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.
When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
or
"Sampling error"
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Blackvegetable » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Of what?



 

It's a secret.

Vegas » Today, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:01 am

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.
When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
or
"Sampling error"
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Which of those words did you copy and paste?
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:08 pm

Which of those words did you copy and paste?

Still \too afraid to answer.        Keep stalling, coward. It won't protect you.



Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content. 

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.