I don't rely on influencers, JuCo....
Dont ya get it my freind both sides do the same exact thingy*Huey » Yesterday, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not talking about the Five, moron. I am talking about left wing staffers and journalists. They say you are a **** idiot.
You are not a particularly smart or intelligent person. You have no critical thinking skills.
You were "grifted" from 2020 until 2025.. The question is by whom. Who was in charge, ******?
Blackvegetable » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I don't rely on influencers, JuCo....
That's for slack jawed rubes.
Might I add one more thingy.TwoIfByTea » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Dont ya get it my freind both sides do the same exact thingy
Its sheer hipocrassy
When can this "Great Nation" be "Honest" and identify the "Problems"..
Start that now ya be in Jail worst case scenario The "CIA" put one thru ya eyeballs too
Because abuncha powers that be are "Controlled" by K-STREET "Lobbyist" and they dont want the "Real Problems" Fixed neither because they "PROFIT" from it
They are called "Democrats" or "Republicans"
Certainly less than the 99.999% content of your 'no-thought' posts...
JuCo,ROG62 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Certainly less than the 99.999% content of your 'no-thought' posts...
Blackvegetable » Today, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ Break this down for me..
To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him.
Break it down for us.Vegas » Today, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude, enough of that. It literally does not contradict a god damn thing. All you do is stall and copy/paste.
Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Kent also slammed the intelligence assessment for failing to adequately portray the situation at the southern border and what he believed was the Biden administration’s role in creating a migrant crisis. He characterized the former president “as having announced that the border was open and having turned Customs and Border Protection into a ‘travel service for illegals’,” the Times reported. “TDA didn’t need logistical support from the Venezuelan government because Biden provided it for them,” Kent wrote. “I understand some may view this as political, but it’s not.”
ibid.
F... no, Flunky......
Seriously, Sockpuppet..*Huey » 24 May 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ Damn dudette, you really need to up your game.
You are talking about people being "grifted" ad you fell for the biggest grift in presidential history. Biden was a **** vegetable and you failed to see it.
Who was in charge? And yes, I am addressing what you posted in the OP. Remember, I giver your threads the same respect you give other people's threads.
The ones her pimp wrote on on your moms sorry *** ***.
Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ According to the Times, Kent pushed officials to edit the intelligence study about whether the administration could justify the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to a brutal prison in El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used 18th-century wartime law, by linking the Tren de Aragua gang to the Venezuelan government....
The original analysis reportedly contradicted the Trump administration’s claim that the Tren de Aragua gang is controlled by the Venezuelan government and has been ordered to commit crimes inside the United States.
To shield the administration from political blowback, Kent allegedly urged edits to the report.
“We need to do some rewriting” and more analytic work “so this document is not used against the DNI or POTUS,” Kent wrote in an email on April 3 to a group of intelligence officials, the newspaper reported.
https://www.removepaywall.com/search?ur ... nst-trump/
People so **** stupid they must have been born to be grifted.
And you couldn’t field a candidate to beat THAT GUY. How pathetic is your side?Blackvegetable » 24 May 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ Trump called fallen soldiers "suckers” and "losers" during his presidency
Trump made lewd comments about his daughter Ivanka's appearance and talked about "what it might be like to have sex with her." This prompted a rebuke from his chief of staff,
I don't find that the pathetic part.Cedar » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And you couldn’t field a candidate to beat THAT GUY. How pathetic is your side?
**chuckle**
SouthernFried » Today, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑"According to the Times". You may as well say, "According to MSNBC". Failed, 4 words in. This guy is a gluten for punishment.
This guy is a gluten for punishment.