Liberal Forum

30yrs ago. Sam Antar COMMITTED FRAUD... and he WAS Arrested, Convicted, and PAID his debt to society!!  TODAY, he FIGHTS AGAINST fraud, and he KNOWS what it is and HOW criminals try to hide it... LETICA James is GUILTY as SIN... ON MULTIPLE COUNTS... and if she thinks Donald Trump isn't going to NAIL her CORRUPT, FAT, BLACK *** to a WALL, after what she tried to do to HIM... for MUCH, MUCH LESS?  ...then, SHE has another "think" coming !!!

LISTEN to Sam Antar lay it all OUT !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL62Xvk32yc&t=17s
 
 

ConservativeWave » 25 May 2025, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:06 pm

30yrs ago. Sam Antar COMMITTED FRAUD... and he WAS Arrested, Convicted, and PAID his debt to society!!  TODAY, he FIGHTS AGAINST fraud, and he KNOWS what it is and HOW criminals try to hide it... LETICA James is GUILTY as SIN... ON MULTIPLE COUNTS... and if she thinks Donald Trump isn't going to NAIL her CORRUPT, FAT, BLACK *** to a WALL, after what she tried to do to HIM... for MUCH, MUCH LESS?  ...then, SHE has another "think" coming !!!

LISTEN to Sam Antar lay it all OUT !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL62Xvk32yc&t=17s

:rofl:  

ConservativeWave » 25 May 2025, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:06 pm

30yrs ago. Sam Antar COMMITTED FRAUD... and he WAS Arrested, Convicted, and PAID his debt to society!!  TODAY, he FIGHTS AGAINST fraud, and he KNOWS what it is and HOW criminals try to hide it... LETICA James is GUILTY as SIN... ON MULTIPLE COUNTS... and if she thinks Donald Trump isn't going to NAIL her CORRUPT, FAT, BLACK *** to a WALL, after what she tried to do to HIM... for MUCH, MUCH LESS?  ...then, SHE has another "think" coming !!!

LISTEN to Sam Antar lay it all OUT !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL62Xvk32yc&t=17s

So you will no longer insist that Grifty's 450 million judgment is "lawfare" and demand that he pay up...

Nothing will happen to her

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:44 pm

So you will no longer insist that Grifty's 450 million judgment is "lawfare" and demand that he pay up...

but instead of making up charges, those against james are on the books.

ROG62 » 26 May 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 5:23 am

but instead of making up charges, those against james are on the books.

Which charges were "made up", JuCo?

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:44 pm

So you will no longer insist that Grifty's 450 million judgment is "lawfare" and demand that he pay up...

WHAT the HELL are YOU talking about?

The "?Judge?"Juan Merchan... REFUSED to sentence Trump, after the illegitimate & POLITICAL conviction, because HE KNEW if he did, it would be overturned on appeal... SO, he decided to NOT sentence Trump, so that the "conviction" remained a "conviction" in name only... in LIMBO... BUT, NEVER to be acted on !

HOWEVER, AMERICA KNOWS that it was ALL Democrat Party LAWFARE... it will NEVER be consummated, and Donald Trump will NEVER pay the "Judgement"...  AND... AMERICA SHOWED where THEY STOOD on the ISSUE... KNOWING ALL OF THAT...  THEY RE-Elected Donald TRUMP, and NOT Kamala Harris, as PRESIDENT of the United States !!!

CHEW on THAT for a while.. AND, THAT THIS is NOT OVER!!  NOT, by a LONG SHOT!   Donald Trump is just getting more and more popular with America, while the Democrat Party approval is down in the 20% range !!
 

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:42 pm

No one is above the law.  ;)

*Huey » 26 May 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:25 am

No one is above the law.  

So you will no longer insist that Grifty's 450 million judgment is "lawfare" and demand that he pay up...


:die:  

ConservativeWave » 26 May 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:19 am

WHAT the HELL are YOU talking about?

The "?Judge?"Juan Merchan... REFUSED to sentence Trump, after the illegitimate & POLITICAL conviction, because HE KNEW if he did, it would be overturned on appeal... SO, he decided to NOT sentence Trump, so that the "conviction" remained a "conviction" in name only... in LIMBO... BUT, NEVER to be acted on !

HOWEVER, AMERICA KNOWS that it was ALL Democrat Party LAWFARE... it will NEVER be consummated, and Donald Trump will NEVER pay the "Judgement"...  AND... AMERICA SHOWED where THEY STOOD on the ISSUE... KNOWING ALL OF THAT...  THEY RE-Elected Donald TRUMP, and NOT Kamala Harris, as PRESIDENT of the United States !!!

CHEW on THAT for a while.. AND, THAT THIS is NOT OVER!!  NOT, by a LONG SHOT!   Donald Trump is just getting more and more popular with America, while the Democrat Party approval is down in the 20% range !!

The "?Judge?"Juan Merchan... REFUSED to sentence Trump, 

groan.

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:29 am

So you will no longer insist that Grifty's 450 million judgment is "lawfare" and demand that he pay up...

He is allowed to appeal.  And if he loses he should pay BUT it was still law fare. She ran for office on the position that she will find a crime concerning Trump.  Instead of the rising crime rates in NYC at the time.

Blackvegetable » 25 May 2025, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

25 May 2025, 7:44 pm

So you will no longer insist that Grifty's 450 million judgment is "lawfare" and demand that he pay up...

 typical spin attempt fail.....^^^^^^^^^      

More correctly, "What is good for the goose is good for the gander".......now take a great big nasty whiff of your party's own cooking......   !!!!
 

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:30 am

groan.

THIS Judge (i.e. Merchan) KNOWS he LOST... when a conviction occurs without the "trial judgement" being imposed...THAT is a ESSENTIALLY a NOT Guilty decision !  They convicted Trump, but "We the People" let Merchan KNOW what WE thought... IT WAS BULL $HIT !!

GET USED TO IT !

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/donald ... d-2nd-term

ConservativeWave » 26 May 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:44 am

THIS Judge (i.e. Merchan) KNOWS he LOST... when a conviction occurs without the "trial judgement" being imposed...THAT is a ESSENTIALLY a NOT Guilty decision !  They convicted Trump, but "We the People" let Merchan KNOW what WE thought... IT WAS BULL $HIT !!

GET USED TO IT !

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/donald ... d-2nd-term

THIS Judge (i.e. Merchan) KNOWS he LOST... when a conviction occurs without the "trial judgement" being imposed...THAT is a ESSENTIALLY a NOT Guilty decision ! 

quote him.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 May 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:38 am

 typical spin attempt fail.....^^^^^^^^^      

More correctly, "What is good for the goose is good for the gander".......now take a great big nasty whiff of your party's own cooking......   !!!!

That nets out as a "yes".

**** idiot.

*Huey » 26 May 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:33 am

He is allowed to appeal.  And if he loses he should pay BUT it was still law fare. She ran for office on the position that she will find a crime concerning Trump.  Instead of the rising crime rates in NYC at the time.

BUT it was still law fare

I know, right.


But you insist that you aren't a slack jawed moron.

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:56 am

I know, right.

But you insist that you aren't a slack jawed moron.

Again, for the retards, she ran on FINDING a crime.  She pieced together a couple of laws that really didn't apply and no one was ever charged with in similar cases.

But hey, you keep showing what Morning Joe Retard you are.

*Huey » 26 May 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 11:01 am

Again, for the retards, 

Proceeds to roll up with The Five's narrative...like a dutiful toady sockpuppet.


Never, ever, presume to explain anything, Slack Jawed Rube.

 

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 11:04 am

*Huey » 26 May 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 11:01 am

Again, for the retards, 

Proceeds to roll up with The Five's narrative...like a dutiful toady sockpuppet.


Never, ever, presume to explain anything, Slack Jawed Rube.

 

 

 

*Huey » 26 May 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 11:01 am

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:56 am

I know, right.

But you insist that you aren't a slack jawed moron.

Again, for the retards, she ran on FINDING a crime.  She pieced together a couple of laws that really didn't apply and no one was ever charged with in similar cases.

But hey, you keep showing what Morning Joe Retard you are.

 

Sorry, try again.  That virus is preventing the entire quote from being displayed.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 May 2025, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 10:55 am

That nets out as a "yes".

**** idiot.

 typical spin attempt fail.....^^^^^^^^^       

More correctly, "What is good for the goose is good for the gander".......now take a great big nasty whiff of your party's own cooking......   !!!!