the house republicans that voted for it have a good chance not to get reelected.*Beekeeper » 26 May 2025, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Congress hasn't passed Trump's budget. ASSKISS!! It's still in the Senate for deliberation.
And that means that 1000% of your **** BLOVIATING is, well, TOTALLY MEANT FOR IDIOTS LIKE YOU TO CONSUME and regurgitate like the good little lemming you are!!
And it's NOT been sent to Trump to sign into law either.
How **** STUPID ARE YOU??
Run!!
Explain why "hobbling" judges is not called for. Explain it in the context of JUDGES having forced gay marriage down the throat of a democratic polity which had - by vote - rejected it. Ecplain it in the context of judges wittingly enforcing gender confusion. Tell us why you would be against hobbling such a judiciary, behaving in such a way.jerrab » 26 May 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ also included in the bill
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 797120007/
Trump's Republican allies in Congress are trying to help him hobble those judges, slipping into the oxymoronically named "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" that passed in the U.S. House on May 22 a short provision that would hamper judges from enforcing "contempt citations for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining orders."
Those are exactly the type of recent rulings that have so enraged Trump. And the bill doesn't just stymy judges going forward. It would apply retroactively to rulings already in place.
They're miffed and peeved, I tell ya.jerrab » 26 May 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ people are damn mad about congress passing trump's budget. some republicans may be voted out.
they voted for someone who showed that only billionaires matter.Cannonpointer » 26 May 2025, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑ They're miffed and peeved, I tell ya.
Should they have voted for the braying **** who was never nominated?
DO A BETTER JOB.
They voted for someone who was nominated.jerrab » 26 May 2025, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ they voted for someone who showed that only billionaires matter.
Cannonpointer » 26 May 2025, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Explain why "hobbling" judges is not called for. Explain it in the context of JUDGES having forced gay marriage down the throat of a democratic polity which had - by vote - rejected it. Ecplain it in the context of judges wittingly enforcing gender confusion. Tell us why you would be against hobbling such a judiciary, behaving in such a way.
They were in the post you responded to.
BackTruth Details16209 repliesCannonpointer » 26 May 2025, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑ They were in the post you responded to.
Why SHOULDN'T these overweaning judges experience some push back?
Cannonpointer » 26 May 2025, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑ They voted for someone who was nominated.
Had they voted for your braying she-boon, they could make no such boast.
DO BETTER.
When judges are appointed to defeat the law, yes.jerrab » 26 May 2025, 11:00 pm » wrote: ↑ BackTruth Details16209 replies
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump The Supreme Court has just ruled that the worst murderers, drug dealers, gang members, and even those who are mentally insane, who came into our Country illegally, are not allowed to be forced out without going through a long, protracted, and expensive Legal Process, one that will take, possibly, many years for each person, and one that will allow these people to commit many crimes before they even see the inside of a Courthouse. The result of this decision will let more CRIMINALS pour into our Country, doing great harm to our cherished American public. It will also encourage other criminals to illegally enter our Country, wreaking havoc and bedlam wherever they go. The Supreme Court of the United States is not allowing me to do what I was elected to do. Sleepy Joe Biden allowed MILLIONS of Criminal Aliens to come into our Country without any “PROCESS” but, in order to get them out of our Country, we have to go through a long and extended PROCESS. In any event, thank you to Justice Alito and Justice Thomas for attempting to protect our Country. This is a bad and dangerous day for America--------
nothing about gays here----- are presidents elected to place themselves above the law?
I am quite sure that he will. But I don;t care. The last two candidates you gave us were either the result of a criminally corrupt nomination process or no nomination process at all. You coronated a braying harpy with zero political chops who is known to have sucked willie brown's dick for committee appointments in the beginning of her unimpressive political career.jerrab » 26 May 2025, 11:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I am sure the next candidate will not want boys in girls sports.
jerrab » 26 May 2025, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ the house republicans that voted for it have a good chance not to get reelected.
run real fast.
jerrab » 26 May 2025, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ the house republicans that voted for it have a good chance not to get reelected.
run real fast.
https://i.postimg.cc/5yT7qRgK/Trump-Pre ... inting.jpgFor now, our political opposition is in a terrible state of disarray. Their communications have collapsed, their base is too small to win elections, and their insatiable desire to attack and talk down to those with whom they disagree will forever hamstring their efforts at rebuilding.
They don't want to have any engagement in the cesspoolitical shyt show.*Beekeeper » 27 May 2025, 4:46 am » wrote: ↑ When DHIMOCRAPS are polling WELL BELOW gonorrhea, your sides chances of being elected are slime to zilch.
Nice try, but you have ZERO basis or foundation in fact to support your **** bloviating.
Would not taking LSD before you post help with the reader's ability to comprehend.....or do you believe the reader could compensate by using it?JohnnyYou » 27 May 2025, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ They don't want to have any engagement in the cesspoolitical shyt show.
Young people don't talk to strangers. Sane people don't have time for MSNBC right now. Your 37 percent eat Newsmax like it is Steamy Details Vagina
And I thought polls don't matter to you guys? How is duh oranger furriers approval rating? Globally?
I know Putie is dropping his review to 1 star after Trump said he is nooking phutz bombing innocent Ukrainians this weekend..
Onward with the batshyt weaving the train down the road with flip flops..
https://i.postimg.cc/Pf04sdrF/****.jpgJohnnyYou » 27 May 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑Johnny You, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
RebelGator » 27 May 2025, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑ Would not taking LSD before you post help with the reader's ability to comprehend.....or do you believe the reader could compensate by using it?
the next dem will defeat trump. trump won because of wokeness. dems did not vote for harris not every dem supports wokeness and it is high time you realize that.Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 12:40 am » wrote: ↑ I am quite sure that he will. But I don;t care. The last two candidates you gave us were either the result of a criminally corrupt nomination process or no nomination process at all. You coronated a braying harpy with zero political chops who is known to have sucked willie brown's dick for committee appointments in the beginning of her unimpressive political career.
Work on YOUR party. Do better. Your party is unworthy, untrusted, unscrupulous. That is why you were rejected. You could not beat an orange, insane, narcissistic felon. That means you suck really, really hard. Come to grips with that, while the adults put the judiciary in check to save America from the army your party allowed AND ASSISTED to invade.