Keep discussing low IQ's, its a testament to your internal racist struggles.Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Have you ever asked yourself why at-or-below-the-mean white trash like you and @GHETTO BLASTER make such an issue of IQ?
First, the racial science on which it rested was utterly bogus. IQ was treated as a rigorous statistical tool rather than a rough and ready benchmark that can do pretty much whatever you want it to. The evidence that on almost every measure there are far greater differences within so-called racial groups than there are between them was ignored.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v47/n09 ... key-cowboy
Your intellectual advantage over a hypothetical negro is far less significant than the extent to which you are inferior to me.
Give that some time to sink in.
All that, and these calves too....it's hardly fair...
My bad...Skans » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Keep discussing low IQ's, its a testament to your internal racist struggles.
Admitting you are a racist is step 1. Now, you must explain to forum why discussing low IQ's is a racist thing to do. You may want to research this a bit to make sure you are not providing the forum with any misleading facts.Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ My bad...
We'll never know what you're able to handle unless we stress your envelope....
I'm not a racist.Skans » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Admitting you are a racist is step 1. Now, you must explain to forum why discussing low IQ's is a racist thing to do. You may want to research this a bit to make sure you are not providing the forum with any misleading facts.
A low 2 ft hurdle in a 100m track and field, to be sure…
rather than a rough and ready benchmark that can do pretty much whatever you want it to....Blackvegetable » Today, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ Have you ever asked yourself why at-or-below-the-mean white trash like you and @GHETTO BLASTER make such an issue of IQ?
First, the racial science on which it rested was utterly bogus. IQ was treated as a rigorous statistical tool rather than a rough and ready benchmark that can do pretty much whatever you want it to. The evidence that on almost every measure there are far greater differences within so-called racial groups than there are between them was ignored.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v47/n09 ... key-cowboy
Your intellectual advantage over a hypothetical negro is far less significant than the extent to which you are inferior to me.
Give that some time to sink in.
All that, and these calves too....it's hardly fair...
yet he never reveals the "magic number" that is determinate of what makes a man a, well, MAN...maybe you can try?
Are you a phrenologist, Rog?ROG62 » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ rather than a rough and ready benchmark that can do pretty much whatever you want it to....
eat ****...
Cubicle, you forgot some:
As I said…you won’t do ****, ******.
You keep promising that.
I am not promising anything.Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You keep promising that.
Since you're rebleating
Why didn't you cast a third proud vote for the rapist felon you consider 2ndBesty.....behind someone whose name you dare not speak, because you're a ******....
Post the rule...
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Post the rule...
And your stipulation.
Can wrap this up in 2 posts..
honestly believing isn't being honest about life lived as specifically one of a kind daily here.
*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Post the rule...
And your stipulation.
Can wrap this up in 2 posts..
You can wrap this up with one answer, and the acknowledgement concerning. e answering questions. Balls in your court, Daddy' Lil Bitch. Yeah, we know you won't do ****.
Actually, yes, it is about you.