Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 7:53 am

They have it in their minds that they can enforce their agenda through loaded questions, and they have no obligation whatever to answer questions about their questions. 

Trump and Musk and others - like Lavrov for Russia - are diabusing them of that notion.

"diabusing"   Never seen that spelling before.

jerrab » 26 May 2025, 11:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 11:20 pm

wow. really?

Ironic that a white lib lectured Candace Owens on racism. 

roadkill » 27 May 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:23 am

"diabusing"   Never seen that spelling before.

Squares spell is "disabusing." I was using the hip new spelling. 

jerrab » 26 May 2025, 11:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2025, 11:20 pm

wow. really?

She called out their game and bitch-slapped them publicly. 

I'm sure you side with the white people - all part of your established racism. Nothing we would not expect from a white nationalist. ButI side with the of-colored girl. Because I am - unlike you - color blind. Especially so, when it comes to people who echo my opinion. 
 

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:31 am

Squares spell is "disabusing." I was using the hip new spelling.

I always knew you were a hipster...who knows, someday you might be as cool as I am.     

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUw6aUwfzwc
 

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:36 am

She called out their game and bitch-slapped them publicly. 

I'm sure you side with the white people - all part of your established racism. Nothing we would not expect from a white nationalist. ButI side with the of-colored girl. Because I am - unlike you - color blind. Especially so, when it comes to people who echo my opinion.

my comment was about trump breaking his  promise.


https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opi ... rcna208518

"Media TURNS ON Letitia James"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41O6rjtWRc4
 

jerrab » 27 May 2025, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 11:16 am

my comment was about trump breaking his  promise.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opi ... rcna208518

Interesting claims from an utterly untrustworthy source. I prefer to hear it from the CBO rather than CNN anal-ysts. 

From your link: "Though the GOP bill doesn’t explicitly call for Medicare cuts, it would trigger them under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act. Congress passed Stat PAYGO in 2010..."

Who was in charge in 2010, setting this up to happen (assuming it is happening)? What do PROPONENTS of the included language say? Do they say the money saved will be from no longer giving medicaid to illegal aliens?

IF IT DOES, DO YOU STILL OBJECT TO IT?

Yes/No RSVP
 

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:30 pm

Interesting claims from an utterly untrustworthy source. I prefer to hear it from the CBO rather than CNN anal-ysts. 

From your link: "Though the GOP bill doesn’t explicitly call for Medicare cuts, it would trigger them under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act. Congress passed Stat PAYGO in 2010..."

Who was in charge in 2010, setting this up to happen (assuming it is happening)? What do PROPONENTS of the included language say? Do they say the money saved will be from no longer giving medicaid to illegal aliens?

IF IT DOES, DO YOU STILL OBJECT TO IT?

Yes/No RSVP

Did you get a stamp on the back of yer hand before entering my thread?   I have to keep track of the riff raff.   lol


 
 

roadkill » 27 May 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:54 am

I always knew you were a hipster...who knows, someday you might be as cool as I am.   

I hope not. Losing that much blood flow tomy medulla oblongata WOULD cool me off, but at a turble price.   
 

roadkill » 27 May 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:51 pm

Did you get a stamp on the back of yer hand before entering my thread?   I have to keep track of the riff raff.   lol

I stumbled in drunk, uninvited, while the doorman was distracted, looking for a fight.

That usually ends in disaster, but I got lucky and found a weak sissy like johnny you to sucker punch.  :LOL:  

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 1:11 pm

I stumbled in drunk, uninvited, while the doorman was distracted, looking for a fight.

That usually ends in disaster, but I got lucky and found a weak sissy like johnny you to sucker punch.  

He is punchable isn't he.      

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 1:09 pm

I hope not. Losing that much blood flow tomy medulla oblongata WOULD cool me off, but at a turble price. 

Not if you own the nads.     

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:30 pm

Interesting claims from an utterly untrustworthy source. I prefer to hear it from the CBO rather than CNN anal-ysts. 

From your link: "Though the GOP bill doesn’t explicitly call for Medicare cuts, it would trigger them under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act. Congress passed Stat PAYGO in 2010..."

Who was in charge in 2010, setting this up to happen (assuming it is happening)? What do PROPONENTS of the included language say? Do they say the money saved will be from no longer giving medicaid to illegal aliens?

IF IT DOES, DO YOU STILL OBJECT TO IT?

Yes/No RSVP

the medicaid cuts apply to many people. people who vote. illegal aliens can't vote.

https://www.medicarerights.org/medicare ... d-medicare

The House-passed bill would extend and expand upon many of the tax cuts Republicans passed in 2017, boost spending on administration priorities like immigration enforcement, and raise the statutory debt limit by $4 trillion. Some of these costs would be paid for, largely through harmful cuts to programs that millions rely on to stay healthy, including Medicaid, Medicare, the Affordable Care Act, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

The bill would also raise costs and jeopardize care for many who manage to keep their health coverage. It would strip low-income Medicare beneficiaries of critical financial assistance, making it harder for them to pay for care and prescription drugs; impose new out of pocket cost requirements on some Medicaid enrollees; and drive up premiums and cost sharing for people with marketplace plans. Other policies target specific populations: It would reduce affordability and access to care for immigrants, transgender people, women, and people in need of reproductive health services, as well as put older adults and people with disabilities at risk by removing life-saving nursing home staffing require
 
 

jerrab » 27 May 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 1:50 pm

the medicaid cuts apply to many people. people who vote. illegal aliens can't vote.

https://www.medicarerights.org/medicare ... d-medicare

The House-passed bill would extend and expand upon many of the tax cuts Republicans passed in 2017, boost spending on administration priorities like immigration enforcement, and raise the statutory debt limit by $4 trillion. Some of these costs would be paid for, largely through harmful cuts to programs that millions rely on to stay healthy, including Medicaid, Medicare, the Affordable Care Act, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

The bill would also raise costs and jeopardize care for many who manage to keep their health coverage. It would strip low-income Medicare beneficiaries of critical financial assistance, making it harder for them to pay for care and prescription drugs; impose new out of pocket cost requirements on some Medicaid enrollees; and drive up premiums and cost sharing for people with marketplace plans. Other policies target specific populations: It would reduce affordability and access to care for immigrants, transgender people, women, and people in need of reproductive health services, as well as put older adults and people with disabilities at risk by removing life-saving nursing home staffing require

President of yer source...

Frederic Riccardi, MSW, holds a Master of Social Work from Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College. He is a lecturer at the Columbia University School 

He looks like Socialism.  Maybe CP could recommend a dictator.   

 
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy5wmiEAO_g
 

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:30 pm

Interesting claims from an utterly untrustworthy source. I prefer to hear it from the CBO rather than CNN anal-ysts. 

From your link: "Though the GOP bill doesn’t explicitly call for Medicare cuts, it would trigger them under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act. Congress passed Stat PAYGO in 2010..."

Who was in charge in 2010, setting this up to happen (assuming it is happening)? What do PROPONENTS of the included language say? Do they say the money saved will be from no longer giving medicaid to illegal aliens?

IF IT DOES, DO YOU STILL OBJECT TO IT?

Yes/No RSVP

the bottom line and the most important to voters....

-------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, if this ruinous giveaway to the rich were never enacted in the first place, such a solution would be unnecessary. But Republicans are eager to gut lifesaving programs that millions of Americans rely on to give tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy. And if that includes Medicare, well so be it.

 

jerrab » 27 May 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 1:50 pm

the medicaid cuts apply to many people. people who vote. illegal aliens can't vote.

https://www.medicarerights.org/medicare ... d-medicare

The House-passed bill would extend and expand upon many of the tax cuts Republicans passed in 2017, boost spending on administration priorities like immigration enforcement, and raise the statutory debt limit by $4 trillion. Some of these costs would be paid for, largely through harmful cuts to programs that millions rely on to stay healthy, including Medicaid, Medicare, the Affordable Care Act, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

The bill would also raise costs and jeopardize care for many who manage to keep their health coverage. It would strip low-income Medicare beneficiaries of critical financial assistance, making it harder for them to pay for care and prescription drugs; impose new out of pocket cost requirements on some Medicaid enrollees; and drive up premiums and cost sharing for people with marketplace plans. Other policies target specific populations: It would reduce affordability and access to care for immigrants, transgender people, women, and people in need of reproductive health services, as well as put older adults and people with disabilities at risk by removing life-saving nursing home staffing require

Makes ya wonder why those 2010 democrats had their lip on wall street's cock so hard...
 

jerrab » 27 May 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 2:11 pm

the bottom line and the most important to voters....

-------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, if this ruinous giveaway to the rich were never enacted in the first place, such a solution would be unnecessary. But Republicans are eager to gut lifesaving programs that millions of Americans rely on to give tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy. And if that includes Medicare, well so be it.

And demoicrats - they're AGAINST the wealthy, and FOR the working class. 

Right?