We've done that..
They did so.....using my definition....which you cut & pasted.
Blackvegetable » Today, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ Try this again....
It is on at least 2 of 15 screens at the gym....I'm there every weekday at the time it starts.
I never hear the voices - I wouldn't last 3 seconds.
Jay Z is worth 2.5 billion.
Your point?
worth what?
2X yours?
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ They did so.....using my definition....which you cut & pasted.
Time for you to answer. **** your deflections. It hasn't helped you and it never will. This isn't going anywhere.
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
And still he will not vouchsafe which of the four options is correct. He prefers the Pahnty Dahnce.Vegas » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
@Cannonpointer Veghead is claiming that you and Huey got the correct answer by using his definition. This guy is so **** desperate.
Cannonpointer » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And still he will not vouchsafe which of the four options is correct. He prefers the Pahnty Dahnce.
Your debt goes wayyyyy back.
So if they used your definition, then that means you can use your definition as well to answer it.Blackvegetable » Today, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ They did so.....using my definition....which you cut & pasted.
Blatant and flagrant projection. Confirmation that Nancy is here. However, she has been here since I posted the question a couple days ago.
Just compare the dates...Vegas » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ Blatant and flagrant projection. Confirmation that Nancy is here. However, she has been here since I posted the question a couple days ago.![]()
What have I got? I got 165 dodges from you, not including the dodges from my the latest survivorship bias question. God only knows how many times you have dodged that one...and how many more times you will continue to do so.
@Blackvegetable so God damn **** stupid. At this point, you are kicking your own ***. I'm just here for the entertainment.Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So if they used your definition, then that means you can use your definition as well to answer it.
Lol. Once again, you trapped yourself.![]()
Post that definition.Vegas » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So if they used your definition, then that means you can use your definition as well to answer it.
Lol. Once again, you trapped yourself.![]()
Nice tantrum.Vegas » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What have I got? I got 165 dodges from you, not including the dodges from my the latest survivorship bias question. God only knows how many times you have dodged that one...and how many more times you will continue to do so.
Lol. You will do anything to avoid answering. I prove that I posted it at a minum of 10 times by now, and you take off a month.
Not incidentally.Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Lol. You will do anything to avoid answering. I prove that I posted it at a minum of 10 times by now, and you take off a month.
Deal?
Your words are useless. Evidence only, moron. Be aware, you will need to go all the way back to the beginning, of who dodged who first? Otherwise, you won't be proving ****. You'll just cherry pick as always.