Liberal Forum

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 9:54 am

Didn't read it. Your words only, coward. 

We've done that..

Time for you to define it in yours...

 

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 9:58 am

@Blackvegetable

They did so.....using my definition....which you cut & pasted.

 

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 8:33 am

Try this again....

It is on at least 2 of 15 screens at the gym....I'm there every weekday at the time it starts.

I never hear the voices - I wouldn't last 3 seconds.

Jay Z is worth 2.5 billion.

Your point?

worth what?

2X yours?

Ah, so you got 13 others to watch yet you choose those two

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:04 am

They did so.....using my definition....which you cut & pasted.

                                                                                   


@Cannonpointer  Veghead is claiming that you and Huey got the correct answer by using his definition. This guy is so **** desperate. 

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:02 am

We've done that..

Time for you to define it in yours...

Time for you to answer. **** your deflections. It hasn't helped you and it never will. This isn't going anywhere.




Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors.

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:08 am

                                                                                   

@Cannonpointer  Veghead is claiming that you and Huey got the correct answer by using his definition. This guy is so **** desperate.

And still he will not vouchsafe which of the four options is correct. He prefers the Pahnty Dahnce. 

Cannonpointer » 27 May 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:30 am

And still he will not vouchsafe which of the four options is correct. He prefers the Pahnty Dahnce.

Every since I posed this question he has gone nuclear. 

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:09 am

Time for you to answer. 

Your debt goes wayyyyy back.

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 10:04 am

They did so.....using my definition....which you cut & pasted.

So if they used your definition, then that means you can use your definition as well to answer it. 

Lol. Once again, you trapped yourself.     

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:12 pm

Your debt goes wayyyyy back.

Blatant and flagrant projection. Confirmation that Nancy is here. However, she has been here since I posted the question a couple days ago.     

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:24 pm

Blatant and flagrant projection. Confirmation that Nancy is here. However, she has been here since I posted the question a couple days ago.   

Just compare the dates...

What have you got?
 

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:25 pm

Just compare the dates...

What have you got?

What have I got? I got 165 dodges from you, not including the dodges from my the latest survivorship bias question. God only knows how many times you have dodged that one...and how many more times you will continue to do so.

 

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:22 pm

So if they used your definition, then that means you can use your definition as well to answer it. 

Lol. Once again, you trapped yourself.   

@Blackvegetable  so God damn **** stupid. At this point, you are kicking your own ***. I'm just here for the entertainment.

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:22 pm

So if they used your definition, then that means you can use your definition as well to answer it. 

Lol. Once again, you trapped yourself.   

Post that definition.

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:27 pm

What have I got? I got 165 dodges from you, not including the dodges from my the latest survivorship bias question. God only knows how many times you have dodged that one...and how many more times you will continue to do so.

Nice tantrum.

Do you have a date?
 

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:39 pm

Post that definition.

Lol. You will do anything to avoid answering. I prove that I posted it at a minum of 10 times by now, and you take off a month. 

Deal?
 

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:41 pm

Nice tantrum.

Do you have a date?

Do you? 

 

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:41 pm

Lol. You will do anything to avoid answering. I prove that I posted it at a minum of 10 times by now, and you take off a month. 

Deal?

Not incidentally.


Post my definition.

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:42 pm

Do you?

Yes.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 27 May 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 12:43 pm

Yes.

Your words are useless. Evidence only, moron. Be aware, you will need to go all the way back to the beginning, of who dodged who first? Otherwise, you won't be proving ****. You'll just cherry pick as always. 

So...,chop chop. Get to it.