Liberal Forum

Rock » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

Sure. I found their rankings from Feb 2024, before the revelation that Biden was braindead. Are you standing with these eggheads even knowing what we now know  about Biden's cognitive issues?

Did you find the answer to your question?

Rock » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Thanks RK. I've not posted much in awhile but I've been lurking for some time. Sometimes I can't help but respond to BV's outlandish ****.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Did you find the answer to your question?

Yes. I think so. Best I can determine is that far left liberals will support a president who is braindead over one who is energetic and gets **** done.

Rock » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Thanks RK. I've not posted much in awhile but I've been lurking for some time. Sometimes I can't help but respond to BV's outlandish ****.

I'm with you Rock. Check out Elon's son...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YTuZEpakHdI
 

Rock » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

Yes. I think so. Best I can determine is that far left liberals will support a president who is braindead over one who is energetic and gets **** done.

Where did the select group of Republicans and Conservatives place Grifty?

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:11 pm

Where did the select group of Republicans and Conservatives place Grifty?

I dunno. But are you saying that you agree that Braindead should be ranked #14?

Rock » Yesterday, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:30 pm

I dunno. But are you saying that you agree that Braindead should be ranked #14?

:rofl:  

FREE LUNCH!

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:06 am

You have the link?

How did Grifty do when they limited the survey to Republicans and Conservatives?

Let me guess...

Your kingdom for a Rembrandt ****** Horse?

the link is posted...**** idiot...

15% of all votes are right leaning...

do the math...

nod...
 

ROG62 » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

the link is posted...**** idiot...

15% of all votes are right leaning...

do the math...

nod...

Read the question, from which you ran, again.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:54 pm

Was Biden inspired severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed.  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:26 am

Read the question, from which you ran, again.

Keep running, Bitch

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.
 

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Keep running, Bitch

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

My position on this matter is clear. I've posted it in the course of the 783 occasions that you've labored it.

You've even confessed to it.

You don't want to debate the issue of "Cognitive Decline & the Presidency", and you sure as **** won't dare broach the topic of "Delusion leveraged by low IQ & the Presidency".

As far as defining "severe cognitive decline", we both know that will never happen.

That leaves "should he have been removed".

To which my answer is No.

Nod.
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

My position on this matter is clear. I've posted it in the course of the 783 occasions that you've labored it.

You've even confessed to it.

You don't want to debate the issue of "Cognitive Decline & the Presidency", and you sure as **** won't dare broach the topic of "Delusion leveraged by low IQ & the Presidency".

As far as defining "severe cognitive decline", we both know that will never happen.

That leaves "should he have been removed".

To which my answer is No.

Nod.

This is a yes or no question, Bitch:

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

Yes, he should have been removed.  Because YES, he was in SEVERE COGNITIVE DECLINE.

You have never answered and taken a stand regarding his severe cognitive decline.  Right now your answer is no because you don't think the **** brain dead should have been removed.  Hell, Bitch, you were gonna vote for him again.  Your a **** retard.  Don't you ever presume to question my votes, Bitch.

*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

This is a yes or no question, Bitch:

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

Yes, he should have been removed.  Because YES, he was in SEVERE COGNITIVE DECLINE.

You have never answered and taken a stand regarding his severe cognitive decline.  Right now your answer is no because you don't think the **** brain dead should have been removed.  Hell, Bitch, you were gonna vote for him again.  Your a **** retard.  Don't you ever presume to question my votes, Bitch.

You got a "No.", Quimmie. 

But only for the part you are able to explain.

If you want to define your terms - you know, take a stand - we can consider the other half of your question. 


 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

You got a "No.", Quimmie. 

But only for the part you are able to explain.

If you want to define your terms - you know, take a stand - we can consider the other half of your question.

     

There is nothing to define.  Jake Tapper is wrong, IYO  Do not EVAH presume to question any of my votes again.  


 

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

You got a "No.", Quimmie. 

But only for the part you are able to explain.

If you want to define your terms - you know, take a stand - we can consider the other half of your question.

In his second mix-up this week, Biden talks about meeting with dead European leadersHe referred to François Mitterrand, who died in 1996, instead of French President Emmanuel Macron and the late Helmut Kohl instead of former German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white- ... rcna137823

Vegas » 27 May 2025, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

27 May 2025, 5:24 pm

I want to get inside information on what Jill was thinking. The power must have consumed her.

Well....she IS a whore......

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:25 am

*Huey » Today, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:16 am

Keep running, Bitch

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

My position on this matter is clear. I've posted it in the course of the 783 occasions that you've labored it.

You've even confessed to it.

You don't want to debate the issue of "Cognitive Decline & the Presidency", and you sure as **** won't dare broach the topic of "Delusion leveraged by low IQ & the Presidency".

As far as defining "severe cognitive decline", we both know that will never happen.

That leaves "should he have been removed".

To which my answer is No.

Nod.
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:33 am

*Huey » Today, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:27 am

This is a yes or no question, Bitch:

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

Yes, he should have been removed.  Because YES, he was in SEVERE COGNITIVE DECLINE.

You have never answered and taken a stand regarding his severe cognitive decline.  Right now your answer is no because you don't think the **** brain dead should have been removed.  Hell, Bitch, you were gonna vote for him again.  Your a **** retard.  Don't you ever presume to question my votes, Bitch.

You got a "No.", Quimmie. 

But only for the part you are able to explain.

If you want to define your terms - you know, take a stand - we can consider the other half of your question. 


 

 

You said no.  Game over.

*Huey » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

You said no.  Game over.

Oooooohhhh...

This new rule will certainly add a wrinkle to future exchanges....

*Huey » Today, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:39 am

     

There is nothing to define.  Jake Tapper is wrong, IYO  Do not EVAH presume to question any of my votes again.

You insist that your advantage is "experience"?

At this point a bailiff would be tasering your asshole shut.