Liberal Forum

SouthernFried » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

You kidding dude? BV would have that cancer-striken walking corpse in there right now if he had it his way.

I know.  But the Cubicle ****** Never Was will not go on record and say it.

 

I see one of the forums most prolific posters still is not man enough to take a **** stand. He is unable to tell us if Biden was or wan't in severe cognitive decline and should have been removes.

Such a great example of what a man is for his daughter.


I wonder why he is afraid to post on topic on this thread? What a **** ****** embarrassing the strong legacy of his family.

*Huey » Today, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:00 am

Seriously, most of you have to admit this. I know there is one who simply refuses.

They realized it when they were instructed to realize it. But your question buries the lead.

The proof came in June of 24 with the first "debate" (pony show - the last presidential debate was Carter v. Ford). 

The question everyone SHOULD be asking is why did Trump agree to a presidential pony show/gotcha-trade/quip-contest in JUNE, when the earliest pony show since the advent of television was in September, and the vast majority of them occured in October? 

Make that make sense. I remember that Trump did the June debate - which he would not have done innocently. He's smarter than that - he didn't get played. He would have demanded to know the reason for this departure from anything resembling normal. He had to know that the democrat machine was ****-canning biden with this move. 

Then there was the elevator boots boy in Florida staging a meaningless debate with california gov. newsome, positioning newsome as a national candidate and a credible nominee. Sothat was something in the works. But the dems were caught - hoisted on their own petard. They hadda run the she-boon or they would be ray ciss. 

So there are two very fishy things with bipartisan fingerprints all over them: The early pony show, and the gratuitous debate between a perfectly credible presidential candidate and the governor of california. These two fishy things clearly were intended to set the stage for trump v newsome. 

*Huey » Yesterday, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:00 am

Seriously, most of you have to admit this. I know there is one who simply refuses.

Do you consider a POTUS "in cognitive decline" a problem?

Why?

Make a case.

*Huey » Yesterday, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:26 pm

One of Our most prolific posters is still clinging desperately to the Survey of Eggheads that has Biden at 13.  If on the next poll he is still there we will have proof of how bias they are.

Please forgive Blacktard. He always takes LSD before posting here. He gets it from those PhD guys.     
 

*Huey » Yesterday, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:00 am

Seriously, most of you have to admit this. I know there is one who simply refuses.

They knew April 25, 2019, when he first announced his candidacy, they just didn't care. They hate Republicans more than they love their country.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:31 am

Do you consider a POTUS "in cognitive decline" a problem?

Why?

Make a case.

I think the problem is people that would vote for someone suffering from dementia. You are the problem.
 

Cedar » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I think the problem is people that would vote for someone suffering from dementia. You are the problem.

Aren't you a bit vulnerable on that score?

 

Cedar » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

They knew April 25, 2019, when he first announced his candidacy, they just didn't care. They hate Republicans more than they love their country.

For whom did you vote in 80 and 84?

Why is this OP such a ******?
 

Cheddy and I get to the crux of this biscuit....

But Controlly has to direct the discussion.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Cheddy and I get to the crux of this biscuit....

But Controlly has to direct the discussion.

Answer this question (it will be a yes or no) and your ****** *** can discuss whatever the **** you want.

was Biden in severe cognitive decline while president?

How can we be certain the OP is a ******?

The PG is bigger than this failed thread.

Looks like the forum’s biggest ****** is afraid of the question. I hope he brings his fa,ily so they can see what a ****** dear old dad is.

*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Answer this question (it will be a yes or no) and your ****** *** can discuss whatever the **** you want.

was Biden in severe cognitive decline while president?

Nobody puts baby in the corner.  
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:31 am

Do you consider a POTUS "in cognitive decline" a problem?

Why?

Make a case.

Bump

*Huey » Yesterday, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:00 am

Seriously, most of you have to admit this. I know there is one who simply refuses.

*Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Answer this question (it will be a yes or no) and your ****** *** can discuss whatever the **** you want.

was Biden in severe cognitive decline while president?

What's your problem with

"Already did."

followed by a digression about that in incident with your grandson?
 

Cedar » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

It bout Pg every single thread would be changed into one a bout Trump or the GOP.  There would be no open debate.  
 

Cedar » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

But for the fact that the coward OP sent the exchange to PG, everyone would know that you've lost...