Liberal Forum

Skans » Yesterday, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:29 am

Edited.  Just because I can.

Skans » Yesterday, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:54 pm

I tended to skip over that.  The weird entitled girl at the end caught my attention. She wanted to stay at home all day and pretend to write a book.  But, when her live-in boyfriend wanted her to be useful and do housework, she hated on him for that. So many things wrong with that scenario, that the one thing I know for sure, that little bitch will NEVER be happy in life.  Sad, but true.

what woman is happy?     
 

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:08 pm

He grew up watching too much Perry Mason Followed by Matlock.  That is why the moron grandstands and is theatrical with his questions.

Funny part is I used to question people for a living.  I worked with lawyers on what they would ask in court or in arbitration.  He has no **** clue what he is doing.

color me surprised...
 

ROG62 » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

what woman is happy?   

A 16 year old going on her first date.  It's all down hill after that!  
 

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:08 pm

He grew up watching too much Perry Mason Followed by Matlock.  That is why the moron grandstands and is theatrical with his questions.

Funny part is I used to question people for a living.  I worked with lawyers on what they would ask in court or in arbitration.  He has no **** clue what he is doing.

So people should disbelieve their lying eyes when they see you always neverrunning like a bitch - because you insist you don't suck as bad as it looks?

Have you ever, successfully, represented yourself in court?

Ever spend 4 hrs with a couple of bright eyed attorneys from the State's AG office hoping to nail you to a cross for their boss?

No litigator would ever put you on the stand....you'd be plucked like a squab.


 

Blackvegetable » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

42 minutes ago

So people should disbelieve their lying eyes when they see you always neverrunning like a bitch - because you insist you don't suck as bad as it looks?

Have you ever, successfully, represented yourself in court?

Ever spend 4 hrs with a couple of bright eyed attorneys from the State's AG office hoping to nail you to a cross for their boss?

No litigator would ever put you on the stand....you'd be plucked like a squab.

Speaking of running. Like a bitch, Bitch:

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

I love your tales from a backwoods court, Bitch.   Keeping running, Bitch.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:50 am

NASDQ opens +179.  Nvidia over 141.  
 

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:08 pm

He grew up watching too much Perry Mason Followed by Matlock.  That is why the moron grandstands and is theatrical with his questions.

Funny part is I used to question people for a living.  I worked with lawyers on what they would ask in court or in arbitration.  He has no **** clue what he is doing.

I struck a nerve with that one.

Skans » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

NASDQ opens +179.  Nvidia over 141.

What was the "Tariff Ruling"?

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

I struck a nerve with that one.

Do you see a reference to your children, mother or domicile?

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Do you see a reference to your children, mother or domicile?

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

What was the "Tariff Ruling"?

I’m tempted to enter puts again…the retail sentiment gauge on this website is undeniably potent…

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Speaking of running. Like a bitch, Bitch:

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.

I love your tales from a backwoods court, Bitch.   Keeping running, Bitch.

Not a single answer...

.....speaking of running....
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:20 am

Oh....faith...

That must make life much easier.

hey plugs had 4 years to run the country.  Did we bitch moan and complain?   Now sit back and let Trump run the country.

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Not a single answer...

.....speaking of running....

what’s the question?
 
 

LowIQTrash » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I’m tempted to enter puts again…the retail sentiment gauge on this website is undeniably potent…

The weirdness variables cannot retain the same potency relative to volatility as they have....The problem is trying to bet on the strength of Stupid.

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Not a single answer...

.....speaking of running....

Was Biden in severe cognitive decline when in office and should he have been removed?  That is a Yes or No question, NoStands.



I have been answering your questions all week, Bitch.  Even the repeat diversion questions.  It is fun watching you run in fear from such a simple fuking question.  Even your own side is admitting that yes, he should have been removed.

Show this to your daughter so she can see what a ****** her father is.

*Huey » Yesterday, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:08 pm

He grew up watching too much Perry Mason Followed by Matlock.  That is why the moron grandstands and is theatrical with his questions.

Funny part is I used to question people for a living.  I worked with lawyers on what they would ask in court or in arbitration.  He has no **** clue what he is doing.

BV knows what he's doing.  He intentionally asks stupid questions.  He could ask better questions, but chooses not to.  He could actually have a discussion, but chooses not to.  So, here is what BV is doing and what he is possibly doing....

• BV is a classic troll - he sticks to the parameters of his style of trolling and rarely deviates from that. 
• Why does BV troll the way he does?  That's what you're really after.  Well, it's for one of these reasons:
  • He works for or volunteers for a Democrat organization, or think-tank that develops talking points to support or oppose certain Democrat positions.  He uses this forum (and others) to develop certain talking points. He gets to test **** out on you......for FREE. 
  • He is with some form of Federal law enforcement; or has connections to it.  He is looking to get you and me in trouble.  So, he has a tight set of parameters within which he can communicate so as not to jeopardize himself or his agency. 
  • He's a moron who has nothing better to do than ask stupid questions.
• We can rule out the later - he has an IQ within the normal range. Nor is he senile, a drunk or a drug addict. That leaves 2 other options. And, I don't think he has what it takes to be in Federal law enforcement.  So, I'd assign a 30% weight to that one and a 60% weight to the first option.  10% is up for grabs, meaning there is a 10% chance that I do not know what he is up to. 

Blackvegetable » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

41 minutes ago

What was the "Tariff Ruling"?

It ruled that the NASDQ is now up 104 points!!!  Must have been ignored by Trump, or stayed by the court.  LOL    
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:13 am

The weirdness variables cannot retain the same potency relative to volatility as they have....The problem is trying to bet on the strength of Stupid.

I wouldn't be surprised with a local top around 6050 followed with a revisit to 5100-5300.

Lots of open air below...