Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Every context.

Every waking hour.

Every day.

LMAO!  You think way to highly of yourself, Kung Fu Panda.

You coming down to speak to the kids, Panda?

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Do you see mention of your children?

Stop getting hysterical.

Speaking of the kids when you gonna carry your *** on down to ask them if their mom is a whore.  I want to see that.  It will be epic.  Just tell me, what hospital system do you wish to use?  Bon Secours and Sentara are big down here.

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Damn, this is an Epic Meltdown, Nancy.

No, I have not stated context is irrelevant.  You are doing exactly what I said you do.

Do you see any reference to the mother of your children?

No, I have not stated context is irrelevant.  

You have.

Exactly as quoted.

You are doing exactly what I said you do.

what is that?

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Speaking of the kids when you gonna carry your *** on down to ask them if their mom is a whore.  I want to see that.  It will be epic.  Just tell me, what hospital system do you wish to use?  Bon Secours and Sentara are big down here.

I asked you if the mother of your children is a whore...you REMFd.

Tell her kids.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Do you see any reference to the mother of your children?

You have.

Exactly as quoted.

what is that?

LMAO!

Go ahead and post a link to this alleged quote.  Remember, you have never done that.  

If you don't that means you aint get ****.

Can't wait to see your next lie.  

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I asked you if the mother of your children is a whore...you REMFd.

Tell her kids.

You did.  And I said it depends of a whore.  

Was your mother whore?  My definition is a one who provides sexual favors for monetary gain.  The way your mom whored herself out to titled family members.

Yo agree with that definition and example?  

Blackvegetable » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

41 minutes ago

No, you failed to show that he did.

Because you're an impotent ******.

Ya follah?

"But it is doing so at the worst possible time, when the presidency has been captured by an aspiring authoritarian who defies all constitutional constraints."

There's a lie.

"Trump’s conspiracy to steal the 2020 election"

There's a lie.

There's more, but your pissy little hissy fit doesn't warrant any more of my valuable time, ******.

 

*Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

You did.  And I said it depends of a whore.  

Was your mother whore?  My definition is a one who provides sexual favors for monetary gain.  The way your mom whored herself out to titled family members.

Yo agree with that definition and example?

It is also used to describe a woman who lifts her skirt recreationally, or violates her oath.

The way your mom whored herself out to titled family members.

She didn't....why would you assume so?

Did your wife/landlady whore herself out to you for help with the other guy's kids?

So the question remains, as it surely will -

Do you consider the mother of your children a whore and do your children tell their kids why they all call you " Cucky"?

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

It is also used to describe a woman who lifts her skirt recreationally, or violates her oath.

She didn't....why would you assume so?

Did your wife/landlady whore herself out to you for help with the other guy's kids?

So the question remains, as it surely will -

Do you consider the mother of your children a whore and do your children tell their kids why they all call you " Cucky"?

LMAO!  Your meltdown is epic.  On this forum I got you melting down.  On the other forum I got Tavy melting down.

I have done my job.  See ya tomorrow, Karen

Cedar » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

"But it is doing so at the worst possible time, when the presidency has been captured by an aspiring authoritarian who defies all constitutional constraints."

There's a lie.

"Trump’s conspiracy to steal the 2020 election"

There's a lie.

There's more, but your pissy little hissy fit doesn't warrant any more of my valuable time, ******.

*Huey avatar *Huey +5 4 minutes ago

"It's a lie!


Is too!"



****** coward...

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

LMAO!  Your meltdown is epic.  On this forum I got you melting down.  On the other forum I got Tavy melting down.

I have done my job.  See ya tomorrow, Karen

Why is my dispassionate dissection of your pathology and cowardice a "meltdown"....it's as if the word has no meaning.

 

*Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

LMAO!

Go ahead and post a link to this alleged quote.  Remember, you have never done that.  

If you don't that means you aint get ****.

Can't wait to see your next lie.

Tiny,

Weren't you just boasting of your mastery of Search?

You're quoted verbatim.

If you need mnemonic aids, help yourself  
 

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

LMAO!  Your meltdown is epic.  On this forum I got you melting down.  On the other forum I got Tavy melting down.

I have done my job.  See ya tomorrow, Karen

On the other forum I got Tavy melting down.

I can only imagine. 

I have done my job. See ya tomorrow, Karen

Get some well earned rest, Piñata...

Tomorrow is another day.

Cedar » Yesterday, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:46 pm

"But it is doing so at the worst possible time, when the presidency has been captured by an aspiring authoritarian who defies all constitutional constraints."

There's a lie.

"Trump’s conspiracy to steal the 2020 election"

There's a lie.

There's more, but your pissy little hissy fit doesn't warrant any more of my valuable time, ******.

******,

Are you going to make a case, on behalf of @*HooooeyVagina, or are you just gonna settle for

Did too!


"an aspiring authoritarian who defies all constitutional constraints."

Trump Says He Fired Director of National Portrait Gallery, Citing D.E.I.


It is unclear if the president has legal grounds to fire the director, Kim Sajet, because the National Portrait Gallery is part of the Smithsonian Institution, which is independent of the federal government despite receiving nearly two-thirds of its budget from Congress.


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/arts ... fired.html

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:59 pm

Tiny,

Weren't you just boasting of your mastery of Search?

You're quoted verbatim.

If you need mnemonic aids, help yourself

but not in context.  This is yours case, not mine.

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

but not in context.  This is yours case, not mine.

Ah, yes...the perpetual Context Conundrum...

It's a good thing you take many stands on it.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Ah, yes...the perpetual Context Conundrum...

It's a good thing you take many stands on it.

You may continue to drone on about this on your own..

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

You may continue to drone on about this on your own..

Tiny,

You always hide behind both sides of it.
 

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:27 am

Oh how many TACO's can they Take Oh?

Tacos are good. How do you like my Taco poem in honor of Jill?

Joe and Jill went up the hill
to get a breakfast taco 
Joe fell down, and Jill "got down"
on Pedro's big fat nacho.   


 
 

MR-7 » Today, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:25 am

Tacos are good. How do you like my Taco poem in honor of Jill?

Joe and Jill went up the hill
to get a breakfast taco 
Joe fell down, and Jill "got down"
on Pedro's big fat nacho.   

I bet Tim Walz White Guy Tacos got Ground Up used Tampons from the boys bathroom in them..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxVce5xunE4