Liberal Forum

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

The case is already made.  Biden wore makeup as well.  You can't refute that.  Now take those tissues and run along and think about how dems can get back men, particularly young men.

Your "Yeah, but Trump BS" has been tossed aside like your mom on payday.  

What case is that?

You don't have ****.

Biden never claimed to head a cult of "Men"....and those who support him don't confuse compensatory posturing with masculinity.

But you idiots do....and your Yam Daddy is a conspicuous fruit.

Cannonpointer » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

There isn't any question that the *** is a dem activist. 

The issue is whether she was "hired by dems." 

She wasn't. It's satire.

 "***"?   That's naughty...

I'm hiring a lawyer...



 
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

What case is that?

You don't have ****.

Biden never claimed to head a cult of "Men"....and those who support him don't confuse compensatory posturing with masculinity.

But you idiots do....and your Yam Daddy is a conspicuous fruit.

Diverting with trump is stupid.  He gained the "man" vote, *******.  Oh, he also increased among women.

You keep thinking that way. You will lose the "man" vote even further, particularly young men.  Remember, that is coming from the party you vote for.