Liberal Forum

*Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign?  Yes or no?  

What word has YOU stumped?

I don’t have to ask the same questions over and over nor do I have to make the same demands over and over 


**** crackhead....

*Huey » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:48 pm

They only believe in science when it benefits their agenda.

agreed...AKA pseudoscience...
 

ROG62 » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

agreed...AKA pseudoscience...

Who are you who are so wise in the ways of Siunz?

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:23 am

Isn't that your issue of the past 2 days?

I added an extra "hoax" to your slogan, and you went blind.

And what you FAIL to comprehend is that by doing so, adds MULTIPLE INTERPRETATIONS to your **** CLAIM!!

And in order to gain CLARIFICATION, it's NECESSARY to require you to ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION, COCKGOBBLER!! OTHERWISE, we are going to understand you mean that the RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA HOAX is one you DON'T BELIEVE IN!!

See, this is easy when you use more than 2 syllable words!! But your OWN ADMISSION is that they confuse you.

*Beekeeper » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

And what you FAIL to comprehend is that by doing so, adds MULTIPLE INTERPRETATIONS to your **** CLAIM!!


 

Post some of these alternate interpretations.

Blackvegetable » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

51 minutes ago

I don’t have to ask the same questions over and over nor do I have to make the same demands over and over 

**** crackhead....

EXCEPT that you DO!! CONSTANTLY, CRACKHEAD COCK SUCKING PIECE OF ****!!

 

Blackvegetable » less than a minute ago » wrote: ↑

less than a minute ago

Post some of these alternate interpretations.

Define which is a HOAX to start!! YOUR sentence, so MAKE YOUR CASE!!

 

*Beekeeper » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Define which is a HOAX to start!! YOUR sentence, so MAKE YOUR CASE!!

You're the one promoting the Ambiguity Theory.


Why is "hoax" confusing when applied to "hoax"?

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:36 am

I don’t have to ask the same questions over and over nor do I have to make the same demands over and over 


**** crackhead....

 

That question has not been answered.  You forgot the answer to questions that have been answered multiple time.

*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

That question has not been answered.  You forgot the answer to questions that have been answered multiple time.

Do you recall if this is this your "follow-up  question"?

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Do you recall if this is this your "follow-up  question"?

 

All you have to do is post yes or no as the answer to the question.  If the answer is yes I will correct, with out deleting, the OP.

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

All you have to do is post yes or no as the answer to the question.  If the answer is yes I will correct, with out deleting, the OP.

No, you need to post what you will do in exchange for a SECOND answer to the same question. 

It must include your admission that the OP is a lie and that you're an illiterate boob.


 

Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

You're the one promoting the Ambiguity Theory.

Why is "hoax" confusing when applied to "hoax"?

It's not a THEORY, CUMBUCKET!!

YOU'RE THE ONE THAT'S WRITING AMBIGUOUS SENTENCES!! And that is a PROVEN FACT!! 

How do you understand such big words seeing how you DEMAND everyone only use 2 syllable words for you to comprehend??

*Beekeeper » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

It's not a THEORY, CUMBUCKET!!

YOU'RE THE ONE THAT'S WRITING AMBIGUOUS SENTENCES!! And that is a PROVEN FACT!! 

How do you understand such big words seeing how you DEMAND everyone only use 2 syllable words for you to comprehend??

Just answer the question. 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Just answer the question.

NOT UNTIL YOU ANSWER THE ONE BEFORE YOU!!!

GO!!

See, you do this **** ALL THE **** TIME!! WE ARE NO LONGER PLAYING YOUR GAME!! EITHER ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION OR WE WILL TAKE YOUR WORDS AS MEANINGLESS DRIVEL THAT YOU SPEW TO ATTEMPT TO AVOID GETTING YOUR *** KICKED OVER AND OVER!!

RUN!!

 

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

No, you need to post what you will do in exchange for a SECOND answer to the same question. 

It must include your admission that the OP is a lie and that you're an illiterate boob.

Already posted.  I'll show you, *******.  

*Huey » Yesterday, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:14 pm

Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign?

Yes or no.  After you finally take an unambiguous stand I will correct the OP. 

Run, ******, Run.  And hide with your binky.

 

@Blackvegetable  

*Huey » Yesterday, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:53 pm

I can't lie on something you refuse to clarify and take an unambiguous stand.

 


Once you answer that question with a yes or no, if need be, a correction will be made.  

 

@Blackvegetable  

*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Already posted.  I'll show you, *******.

I'm not asking for a "correction"....that is too vague, and you hate "wiggle room".

Now stop pretending you're clever enough to extract your tit from the wringer......

Take the self inflicted L.....

It will soon have company. 
 
 

*Beekeeper » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

NOT UNTIL YOU ANSWER THE ONE BEFORE YOU!!!


 

You're not good for it.