So DICKSUCKYBOY, are you going to ANSWER THE QUESTION??
Already have.*Beekeeper » 02 Jun 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ So DICKSUCKYBOY, are you going to ANSWER THE QUESTION??
Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign?
It's a REAL SIMPLE ONE that even a 3 year old can understand and answer.
So we can safely and reasonably determine that your FAILURE TO ANSWER is that either you don't understand the question, or you are an obstinate PIECE OF **** that is a **** IDIOT!!
Or that you don't have the mental capacity to answer!!
Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not asking for a "correction"....that is too vague, and you hate "wiggle room".
Now stop pretending you're clever enough to extract your tit from the wringer......
Take the self inflicted L.....
It will soon have company.
This is a follow-up question.*Huey » 02 Jun 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign? Yes or no?
Are these your words @*HooooeyVagina?I don’t have to ask the same questions over and over nor do I have to make the same demands over and over
Yes, it is. For clarification purposes. THis a key to effective communications.Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2025, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ This is a follow-up question.
You lied.
You will need to address that before we proceed.
It's a fair request, Beekeeper.Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2025, 4:49 am » wrote: ↑
Fondler,
Limit yourself to words of no more than 2 syllables, please.
No...it doesn't require clarification because your original question blew up in your face..*Huey » 02 Jun 2025, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, it is. For clarification purposes. THis a key to effective communications.
Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ No...it doesn't require clarification because your original question blew up in your face..
As you have since acknowledged.
Now it is time for you to confess....after which I will post the answer to your follow-up question.
Nod.
"Odiferous" can be neutral...I think you want "malodorous" or perhaps "putrescent".Cannonpointer » 02 Jun 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ It's a fair request, Beekeeper.
Presumption is odiferous.
No....this is, by your admission, a follow-up question.
Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2025, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ No....this is, by your admission, a follow-up question.
You need to confess that you lied and that you're an idiot.
Chop, chop!
You've asserted that you aren't confused...
Trump is kind of like Moses. Thank God Almighty we may all be free at last...including finally taking the dem-chains off Black America.*Huey » 31 May 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ After years of spam, thousands of posts, BV finally admits he does not believe the Trump Campaign colluded with the Russians in 2016.
What a ******,
EDIT:
Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign?
When BV finds his nuts and answers that question with a yes or no, if needed, this OP will be edited.
I have to congradulate you on an excellent and incisive catch.Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2025, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑ "Odiferous" can be neutral...I think you want "malodorous" or perhaps "putrescent".
Asking for clarification does not indicate one is confused. Again, it is part of effective communication. Particularly with pricks like you who want to have wiggle room.Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2025, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ You've asserted that you aren't confused...
Are you confused about that?
Tiny, Which word has you stumped?*Huey » 02 Jun 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Asking for clarification does not indicate one is confused. Again, it is part of effective communication. Particularly with pricks like you who want to have wiggle room.
Is that your response?I am not confused at all.
ShrugBlackvegetable » 02 Jun 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny, Which word has you stumped?
Is that your response?
If "yes", no further clarification is necessary.
No, you didn't.
"Wiggle room"