Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

And, you lied....now you are lying about lying....as predicted. 

Naturally, this is through no fault of your own....because a puppet has no free will.

I didn't lie.  You history of being ambiguous and having multiple meanings to your weak stances forced me to ask you to clarify.  Once you did I eddied the OP as promised.

 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

what did I post originally?

It is already posted.  As a matter of fact you just posted it.  I am not going to relitigate your loss.  

*Huey » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

It is already posted.  As a matter of fact you just posted it.  I am not going to relitigate your loss.

You're a chronic liar and a coward...

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

You're a chronic liar and a coward...

Actually, you are the one of the most disingenuous posters I have ever met.  You refused to clarify.  Amd it bit you in the ***.  

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Actually, you are the one of the most disingenuous posters I have ever met.  You refused to clarify.  Amd it bit you in the ***.

You have yet to make a case for ambiguity..

Nor will you specify what confused you.


 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

You have yet to make a case for ambiguity..

Nor will you specify what confused you.

I don’t have to make a case.  I was just I was properly understand your not so witty BS.  Just **** clarify when asked, ArmsLength.

See ya.

*Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

I don’t have to make a case.  I was just I was properly understand your not so witty BS.  Just **** clarify when asked, ArmsLength.

See ya.

I don’t have to make a case.  I was just I was properly understand your not so witty BS.

Seriously, Verbal....of all people.



When you say something is "ambiguous", you don't have to clarify what you find ambiguous?

How about telling me what is "B.S." about it?

Just **** clarify when asked, ArmsLength.

Post the rule, Runny...


Oh, wait...


He ran.
 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Seriously, Verbal....of all people.

When you say something is "ambiguous", you don't have to clarify what you find ambiguous?

How about telling me what is "B.S." about it?

Post the rule, Runny...

Oh, wait...

He ran.

Shrug.  I didn’t run.  I did exactly What I said I would.  

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Shrug.  I didn’t run.  I did exactly What I said I would.

You always run.

You did exactly what I said you would.



 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

You always run.

You did exactly what I said you would.

No, ArmsLength, there was no lie told.  I said once you clarified I would edit the post.  It took you 4 or 5 days but when you finally manned up and made the family proud I did exactly what I said I would do.

Now keep running from the other *** whoopin’ I am administrating.

*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

No, ArmsLength, there was no lie told.  I said once you clarified I would edit the post.  It took you 4 or 5 days but when you finally manned up and made the family proud I did exactly what I said I would do.

Now keep running from the other *** whoopin’ I am administrating.

you have acknowledged that

You were answered the first time.

You were asking a follow up question 

The comment did not confuse you "at all"

That you were offered numerous deals for your answer, but ran like a ******.

But you have STILL not explained why adding "Hoax" to your slogan renders it undecipherable. 


Because you're a lying ******.
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

you have acknowledged that

You were answered the first time.

You were asking a follow up question 

The comment did not confuse you "at all"

That you were offered numerous deals for your answer, but ran like a ******.

But you have STILL not explained why adding "Hoax" to your slogan renders it undecipherable. 

Because you're a lying ******.

Your comment had to many loopholes.  Plus, the first saw it I did not even see the second  "Hoax".  You double printed word thing.  Then when I noticed it there was more than one way to take.

Look, you lost.  I did not lie, you finally manned up clarified.  This how it would work if you did it more.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:46 am

This is gonna be a riot....

This OP is a contemptible lie, told by a zerointegrity illiterate coward.

YES....I BELIEVE GRIFTY COLLUDED WITH THE RUSSIANS DURING THE 2016 CAMPAIGN.

I DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE RUSSIA RUSSIA TRUMP HOAX HOAX.

What did YOUR BOY MUELLER FIND, DICKSUCKY??

Oh, that's right, that TRUMP DID NOT COLLUDE WITH RUSSIA!!

Need the QUOTE from his REPORT. Again??

Sucks huh, that your TDS is FAR STRONGER than any FACTS OR TRUTH can present to you, huh??

Asshole

Nod.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:46 am

This is gonna be a riot....

This OP is a contemptible lie, told by a zerointegrity illiterate coward.

YES....I BELIEVE GRIFTY COLLUDED WITH THE RUSSIANS DURING THE 2016 CAMPAIGN.

I DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE RUSSIA RUSSIA TRUMP HOAX HOAX.

Mueller REPORT FACTS..........

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

Damn, That's going to leave a MASSIVE MARK ON THAT TDS *** OF YOURS, DICKYCUCKY!!

*Beekeeper » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

What did YOUR BOY MUELLER FIND, DICKSUCKY??

Oh, that's right, that TRUMP DID NOT COLLUDE WITH RUSSIA!!

Need the QUOTE from his REPORT. Again??

Sucks huh, that your TDS is FAR STRONGER than any FACTS OR TRUTH can present to you, huh??

Asshole

Nod.

Already posted.


 

*Beekeeper » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Mueller REPORT FACTS..........

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

Damn, That's going to leave a MASSIVE MARK ON THAT TDS *** OF YOURS, DICKYCUCKY!!

What is it about Mueller's careful explanation that you don't get?

Hint....is Trump mentioned in your excerpt?

Is he referenced in mine?

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

What is it about Mueller's careful explanation that you don't get?

Hint....is Trump mentioned in your excerpt?

Is he referenced in mine?

Which proves Bv is a cog in the machine.  Whereas a sprocket does not **** chain as a cog does to another cog.    
 
 

roadkill » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Which proves Bv is a cog in the machine.  Whereas a sprocket does not **** chain as a cog does to another cog.  

No...it proves you can't read...which is why you are youtube dependent.

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:23 pm

roadkill » Today, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:15 pm

Which proves Bv is a cog in the machine.  Whereas a sprocket does not **** chain as a cog does to another cog.  

No...it proves you can't read...which is why you are youtube dependent.

 

You fell for this BS Hoax harder than Joe Biden on a flight of stairs.

https://youtu.be/U5Mwc12LtRY?si=YJDZ-A9BQ-z7S2Za

Inspired by Gutfeld! the king of late night.

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:23 pm

No...it proves you can't read...which is why you are youtube dependent.

As you suckle on a failed party.