Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 04 Jun 2025, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2025, 1:08 pm

What is it about Mueller's careful explanation that you don't get?

Hint....is Trump mentioned in your excerpt?

Is he referenced in mine?

Yes. 

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

You PROVE DAILY that you are TOO **** STUPID to actually READ AND COMPREHEND, DICKSUCKY BOY!!

Please, STOP before you get CURB STOMPED EVEN WORSE!!

https://i.imgur.com/kXqiA9A.gif

*Beekeeper » 04 Jun 2025, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2025, 4:52 pm

Yes. 

You PROVE DAILY that you are TOO **** STUPID to actually READ AND COMPREHEND, DICKSUCKY BOY!!

Please, STOP before you get CURB STOMPED EVEN WORSE!!

https://i.imgur.com/kXqiA9A.gif

the Trump campaign

he would be named individually, but he isn't.

Fondler,

You're a **** idiot.

*Huey » 31 May 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2025, 2:07 pm

Edit after someone found his nuts:

Bv has finally found his nuts and clarified his original answer.  BV is still being fooled by the left and the MSM about Russia Russia Trump. I was wrong to think otherwise.  This could have done sooner if the arrogant prick simply clarified when asked.  But, we know he loves to grandstand and get theatrical.

EDIT:

Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign?

When BV finds his nuts and answers that question with a yes or no, if needed, this OP will be edited.

The title of this thread is a lie.

The OP is a zerointegrity little dirtchute...
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Jun 2025, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2025, 5:50 pm

he would be named individually, but he isn't.

Fondler,

You're a **** idiot.

Uh, *******, Trump IS the campaign. PERIOD!! ANYTHING that says "The Trump campaign" is ALL INCLUSIVE OF THE CANDIDATE. Without Trump, there is no "Trump campaign". 

Your little vapid attempt to use some word semantics is **** from the get-go and YOU KNOW IT, ASSHOLE!!

There was NO EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE IN THE TRUMP CAMP DID A DAMN THING WITH THE RUSSIANS. PERIOD!! Mueller's REPORT said as much. PERIOD!!

So you believe that your little "hoax hoax" thing makes you some special something. Well, it makes you a **** IDIOT that just got their *** HANDED TO THEM AGAIN along with ANOTHER massive CURB STOMPING!!

Nod!!

https://media.tenor.com/Cijir9vIvYcAAAA ... ns-wwe.gif

*Beekeeper » 05 Jun 2025, 5:18 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jun 2025, 5:18 am

Uh, *******, Trump IS the campaign. PERIOD!! ANYTHING that says "The Trump campaign" is ALL INCLUSIVE OF THE CANDIDATE. Without Trump, there is no "Trump campaign". 

Your little vapid attempt to use some word semantics is **** from the get-go and YOU KNOW IT, ASSHOLE!!

There was NO EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE IN THE TRUMP CAMP DID A DAMN THING WITH THE RUSSIANS. PERIOD!! Mueller's REPORT said as much. PERIOD!!

So you believe that your little "hoax hoax" thing makes you some special something. Well, it makes you a **** IDIOT that just got their *** HANDED TO THEM AGAIN along with ANOTHER massive CURB STOMPING!!

Nod!!

https://media.tenor.com/Cijir9vIvYcAAAA ... ns-wwe.gif

No, idiot.

The campaign can be charged, POTUS cannot.


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2025, 5:19 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jun 2025, 5:19 am

No, idiot.

The campaign can be charged, POTUS cannot.

Psssst. ****. There was NO CRIME of COLLUSION TO CHARGE ANYONE!!!

Trump DID NOT COLLUDE in ANY MANNER WITH THE RUSSIANS!! Mueller said so and you called that the "Gold Standard" of investigations!!

Sucks for you, ASSHOLE LICKER!!

Run.

*Beekeeper » 05 Jun 2025, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jun 2025, 5:45 am

Psssst. ****. 

You have no idea, Fondler.

You're a moron.

Blackvegetable » 05 Jun 2025, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jun 2025, 5:51 am

You have no idea, Fondler.

You're a moron.

You're right, NO ONE has any idea how many COCKS you suck daily.

NO ONE!! I bet you are called the "GYM'S BEST" aren't you?? Is it down at the "Y"??

Blackvegetable » 31 May 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2025, 2:22 pm

*Huey » 31 May 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2025, 2:20 pm

I can't post your words.  You refuse to answer this question:

Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign?

Your other answer looks as if you don't believe they did.  That is a yes or no question.  I am better at this than you.

Why can't you post these words just because you can't understand them?


I don't believe in the Russia Russia Trump Hoax Hoax.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:06 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:06 am

With respect, which post?  Have't seen it.  Although this is what you always say when you didn't do something I will give you the benefit of the doubt and go back and check.

Mr. Vegetabe I love your attempts aimed at insulting me and making me upset.  They ALWAYS give me a chuckle.  I appreciate that.

viewtopic.php?t=95998
 

 

You said you all ready did.  Odd.  I guess this is your admission you were not being truthful about that.

Anyway, I was looking that a few minutes ago.  I never ran from my words.  And that has nothing to do with this topic.  But I digress, Mr Vegetable.

I have over a weeks worth of posts on that thread, most of which are trying to get you to clarify your words.  You never would.  So, when it is all said and done, it appears you were embarrassed by your words and you were running.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:10 am

You said you all ready did.  Odd.  I guess this is your admission you were not being truthful about that.

Anyway, I was looking that a few minutes ago.  I never ran from my words.  And that has nothing to do with this topic.  But I digress, Mr Vegetable.

I have over a weeks worth of posts on that thread, most of which are trying to get you to clarify your words.  You never would.  So, when it is all said and done, it appears you were embarrassed by your words and you were running.

There was an issue with the link.

Now you can stop yapping and nod.
 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:16 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:10 am

You said you all ready did.  Odd.  I guess this is your admission you were not being truthful about that.

Anyway, I was looking that a few minutes ago.  I never ran from my words.  And that has nothing to do with this topic.  But I digress, Mr Vegetable.

I have over a weeks worth of posts on that thread, most of which are trying to get you to clarify your words.  You never would.  So, when it is all said and done, it appears you were embarrassed by your words and you were running.

There was an issue with the link.

Now you can stop yapping and nod.
 

 

Issue with what link?  You are obviously here, Sir.  I will not stop discussing this as long as you present in a dishonest light.  

Nod, Sir.  All you had to do was clarify your position.  But like most things, you don't think it is manly clarify.  It would save lot's of time.

Mr. Vegetable, from what I observed here there are many people who have difficulty figuring your ever moving goal posts of comments.  

Ad yes when you edit this quote I will put it back.  

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:23 am

Issue with what link?  

Address the evidence you demanded.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:26 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:23 am

 

Address the evidence you demanded.

 

Mr. Vegetable, you will have try that again AND provide a very specific explanation of this alleged evidence.  My comments, in full stand, regardless of how many you eat the post.

Sir, all. you had to do was clarify by answering the yes or no questions.  It is YOU SIR, who are on the run.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2025, 11:03 am

And, you lied....now you are lying about lying....as predicted. 

Naturally, this is through no fault of your own....because a puppet has no free will.

Remember it’s not a lie if you believe it 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:29 am

Mr. Vegetable, you will have try that again AND provide a very specific explanation 

done in the thread...

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:36 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:29 am

Mr. Vegetable, you will have try that again AND provide a very specific explanation 

done in the thread...

 

Mr Vegetable, good for you.  You may leave without clarifying whether or not you believed the Russia Russia Trump Hoax.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:41 am

Mr Vegetable, good for you.  You may leave without clarifying whether or not you believed the Russia Russia Trump Hoax.

I have....that adding the word "hoax" to your slogan causes you such confusion is a good indication of how much stock anyone needs to put in your interpretations. 

It's pretty clear that you're not very capable.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:44 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:41 am

Mr Vegetable, good for you.  You may leave without clarifying whether or not you believed the Russia Russia Trump Hoax.

I have....that adding the word "hoax" to your slogan causes you such confusion is a good indication of how much stock anyone needs to put in your interpretations. 

It's pretty clear that you're not very capable.

 

So to clarify, Mr Vegetable, you are saying that you DO believe the Russia Russia Trump hoax.

Got it.  Thank you for clarifying and it is time to move on to other topics.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:46 am

So to clarify, Mr Vegetable, you are saying that you DO believe 

that you cannot read...

Yes..

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:48 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:46 am

So to clarify, Mr Vegetable, you are saying that you DO believe 

that you cannot read...

Yes..

 

Thank you sir.  Finally, after 2 months, an answer.  Mr Vegetable, that is your average when it comes to clarifying or in other cases, admitting our mistake.

This thread is done.  I will go change the OP.