*Roshambo » 18 Jan 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ In response to similar questions posed by @FJB
In the past, I addressed a comparable question that you raised. Your reply was along the lines of "that is what someone informed you" or something akin to that. Questions of this nature do not warrant a sincere response. Regardless of what I convey to you, you will not accept it, and this exchange will conclude only upon your demise. Your mouth is writing checks that your body can't cash.
Rinse and repeat, nod
*Roshambo » 18 Jan 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑In response to similar questions posed by @FJB
In the past, I addressed a comparable question that you raised. Your reply was along the lines of "that is what someone informed you" or something akin to that. Questions of this nature do not warrant a sincere response. Regardless of what I convey to you, you will not accept it, and this exchange will conclude only upon your demise. Your mouth is writing checks that your body can't cash.
Rinse and repeat, nod
Rinse and repeat, nod
In the past, I addressed a comparable question that you raised. Your reply was along the lines of "that is what someone informed you" or something akin to that. Questions of this nature do not warrant a sincere response. Regardless of what I convey to you, you will not accept it, and this exchange will conclude only upon your demise. Your mouth is writing checks that your body can't cash.FJB » 18 Jan 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ you are too **** funny... keep lying bitch boy. We will keep destroying you daily.
*Roshambo » 18 Jan 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ In the past, I addressed a comparable question that you raised. Your reply was along the lines of "that is what someone informed you" or something akin to that. Questions of this nature do not warrant a sincere response. Regardless of what I convey to you, you will not accept it, and this exchange will conclude only upon your demise. Your mouth is writing checks that your body can't cash.
Rinse and repeat, nod
CHINK BASTARD STFU
Says the Homo that performed oral sex on a fat Jewish lawyer
*Roshambo » 19 Jan 2026, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Says the Homo that performed oral sex on a fat Jewish lawyer
FJB » 18 Jan 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ you are too **** funny... keep lying bitch boy. We will keep destroying you daily.
Not true. I have no daughter. It was you.
The Russia investigation origins conspiracy theory or Russia counter-narrative[1] is a conspiracy theory created by Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Republican Party leaders, and right-wing[2][3] conservatives[4] that attacks the legitimacy and conclusions of multiple investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections and the public and secretive links between Russian intelligence and Trump associates. ...Huey » 31 May 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Edit 15 Aug
I forgot, BV has
EDIT 31 July 2025
After TWO MONTS+HS Mr. Vegetable has finally, finally, FINALLY, clarified ....
I apologize for my haste based on his poorly written statement.
@Blackvegetable
Edit after someone found his nuts:
Bv has finally found his nuts and clarified his original answer. BV
EDIT:
Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign?
When BV finds his nuts and answers that question with a yes or no, if needed, this OP will be edited.
Let me know when you find that Pee Tape.Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ The Russia investigation origins conspiracy theory or Russia counter-narrative[1] is a conspiracy theory created by Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Republican Party leaders, and right-wing[2][3] conservatives[4] that attacks the legitimacy and conclusions of multiple investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections and the public and secretive links between Russian intelligence and Trump associates. ...
The narrative includes conspiracy theories such as Trump's Spygate theory, accusations of a secretive, elite "deep state" network,[4][12] descriptions of the Russian interference investigations as an illegal "Russian collusion hoax",[13] that the "real collusion" was between Hillary Clinton, Democrats, and Russia – and later, Ukraine.
Soooooo, you're suggesting a Russia, Russia Hoax Hoax?
I'll be damned...
@Huey will be completely confused.
Hillary colluded with Russia and Barry spied on a president electBlackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ The Russia investigation origins conspiracy theory or Russia counter-narrative[1] is a conspiracy theory created by Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Republican Party leaders, and right-wing[2][3] conservatives[4] that attacks the legitimacy and conclusions of multiple investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections and the public and secretive links between Russian intelligence and Trump associates. ...
The narrative includes conspiracy theories such as Trump's Spygate theory, accusations of a secretive, elite "deep state" network,[4][12] descriptions of the Russian interference investigations as an illegal "Russian collusion hoax",[13] that the "real collusion" was between Hillary Clinton, Democrats, and Russia – and later, Ukraine.
Soooooo, you're suggesting a Russia, Russia Hoax Hoax?
I'll be damned...
@Huey will be completely confused.
Come back with an annotated version of that.BuckNaked » 10 Feb 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ Hillary colluded with Russia and Barry spied on a president elect
What is an annotated version?
What you responded to.
An annotated version is a text, document, or image enhanced with explanatory notes, comments, or critical analysis, usually added by an editor or expert. These annotations clarify context, define vocabulary, or offer interpretations, typically found in margins or footnotes to aid reader understanding.