She's always been very direct...I wouldn't doubt it if she voted for Trump, just because of the unwavering hardline democratic support for this ****...Skans » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Something she said previously made me think she didn't, or maybe I confused one of someone else's response with hers. But, I do believe her answer to me - she was pretty direct and I wouldn't continue to question her about it. I'm just glad there is at least one Democrat out there that actually cares about girls and women, and not just weirdos.
Post a pick of yourself in xc gear...ROG62 » Today, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ christ, deck shoes...you sure pegged the irony meter with this post......
Blackvegetable » Today, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I'd ask if he thinks his daughter has more to fear from the guy he put in the WH, or some kid finishing 5th at a hs track meet.
EDC4ALL! » Today, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ I saw a video the other day and a lady was yelling "that's a boy, he's a boy"
My daughter made her own friends. She doesn't seek my approval of her opinions.jerrab » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ she will never meet trump but your daughter will lose to pretend girls with your blessing.
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ My daughter made her own friends. She doesn't seek my approval of her opinions.
Meanwhile, non-consensual digital penetration remains rape, and normalizing the practice causes real harm to women.
You like to let older men paw girls.jerrab » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ you like to set the rules for all girls making them compete with boys.
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You like to let older men paw girls.
I'm not looking to make policy...I'm satisfied to let athletic commissions set the rules...as long as they aren't arbitrary.
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑ My daughter made her own friends. She doesn't seek my approval of her opinions.
Meanwhile, non-consensual digital penetration remains rape, and normalizing the practice causes real harm to women.
Colin Kaepernick stood against what he perceived as injustice.
How is it Trumps problem, ***?Cannonpointer » Today, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ NO ****. That's why I have said and will continue to say that Trump has not done **** about the tranny problem. He's just SHELVED it for the next 3.5 years.
FTFY
That's a BINGO!Skans » Today, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Who and what my family members are is completely irrelevant.
You know my stance on men pretending to be women to play sports against women. I have explained this to you succinctly and with enough detail for you to respond.
I have explained why I am against this. Rather than debate me, rather than support your own position on this forum topic, you choose to troll by asking stupid, irrelevant questions. You are afraid to express your view and support that view that men/boys (people you call "trans) should be allowed to compete in women's/girls sports.
Jerra has consistenty been against the tranny nonsense.Skans » Today, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ @jerra b is a part of the problem. Just like BV is. They will not debate you on this topic either, I notice. They won't because they can't. They know their position on this is **** and easily defeated by simple logic. So, they troll, they evade, they mock, and they deflect by asking strings of relevant questions.
And me.
YOU brought yours into it, when you said you had a daughter and lied that she supported strange men coming into her public shower. Then you denied the existence of public showers. You got really, really,stupid.Blackvegetable » Today, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ If you bring mine into it, you toss yours into the firing line.
Those are not the only options, you weak queer.Blackvegetable » Today, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I'd ask if he thinks his daughter has more to fear from the guy he put in the WH, or some kid finishing 5th at a hs track meet.
Although, for the record, according to him, his daughter wants naked men in her shower.Skans » Today, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't bring your daughter into anything. I made no comment about her whatsoever. My comment was 100% about you, your attitudes and your support of men playing in women's sports. Don't go off like I made some comment about your daughter. If I said anything about your daughter, what she looks like, what she wears, what she does, what she thinks or believes, what or who she likes or doesn't like - anything, then play it back right here, for everyone to see.
Are you this stupid?
Bingo. You referred to HIS attitude TOWARD his daughter - and you were over-generous. He backstabs his daughter.Skans » Today, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, I said "But, hey, I guess you are ok with that. As long as it's not happening to your daughter."
You then asked "So, are any of your children girls?"
Choosing not to divulge anything about any children I may have, I told you that your question was irrelevant.
To which you responded "If you bring mine into it, you toss yours into the firing line. You MAGAt pussies are all about the bare knuckle until one bounces off your lip..."
And, in response to your rant, I said "I didn't bring your daughter into anything. I made no comment about her whatsoever. My comment was 100% about you, your attitudes and your support of men playing in women's sports. Don't go off like I made some comment about your daughter. If I said anything about your daughter, what she looks like, what she wears, what she does, what she thinks or believes, what or who she likes or doesn't like - anything, then play it back right here, for everyone to see."
So, now that the conversation is accurately represented, I continue to maintain that I did not say anything about your daughter. I was talking about YOU, and your attitude seemingly approving of men competing against women as long as its not happening to your daughter. You (and everyone else) can now see that I did not make one comment ABOUT your daughter.