Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

If you are going to keep lying about I have to keep proving what a loser you are.

The fact of the matter is the Weapons the AF bought were not Semi Automatic rifles.  

The shorter is not on the military list.  It is on the civilian list.  You lose. That is why you are running like Daddy's Lil ****** from the challenge in my sig box.

Does the Sporter appear in the article which begins

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
 

 

I already answered that as well.  The lists being discussed are in that article, ****.  When I say the Sporter is on the CIVILIAN LIST I **** ASSUMED that after all these years of you ignorantly posting that you would have read the article.  It is obvious you have not read it.

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

*Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

I **** answered, Dickless Wonder.  

After yo prove you have read that citation.  If you did, you wouldn't ask such stupid **** questions.

That's a not answer, obviously.

After yo prove you have 

If you insist you've already answered, why do I need to do anything?



Age related cognitive decline...


 

If you are going to keep lying about I have to keep proving what a loser you are.

The fact of the matter is the Weapons the AF bought were not Semi Automatic rifles.  

The shorter is not on the military list.  It is on the civilian list.  You lose. That is why you are running like Daddy's Lil ****** from the challenge in my sig box.

 

**** off you ignorant waste of a Payday ****.

*Huey » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

53 minutes ago

I already answered that as well.  The lists being discussed are in that article, ****.  When I say the Sporter is on the CIVILIAN LIST I **** ASSUMED that after all these years of you ignorantly posting that you would have read the article.  It is obvious you have not read it.

**** off you ignorant waste of a Payday ****.

Just take this L and keep it with the 327 others you've taken on this topic.

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Just take this L and keep it with the 327 others you've taken on this topic.

****. you are a lying.  YOU Have never handed me a loss on this topic.  You had shot to not only do that but also get rid of me for a time.  You ran from the challenge.  You want to run around here a calling everyone a coward but you are too much of ****** to answer for your words or answer questions.

You should have read that article at some point, ******.  You might look like an *** today.

*Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

****. you are a lying.  YOU Have never handed me a loss on this topic.  You had shot to not only do that but also get rid of me for a time.  You ran from the challenge.  You want to run around here a calling everyone a coward but you are too much of ****** to answer for your words or answer questions.

You should have read that article at some point, ******.  You might look like an *** today.

Only in the retelling.


Those who can read the citations understand otherwise...

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Only in the retelling.

Those who can read the citations understand otherwise...

Only in the retelling? I am the only one who posts verifiable facts.  The Sporter was NEVER on the military n ore was it purchased by the AF.

Yes, you ******* ****, the shorter is in the article you have read.

Game.  Set.  **** Match.  Now run to mommy.  Maybe she will give you a hug.

*Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Only in the retelling? I am the only one who posts verifiable facts.  The Sporter was NEVER on the military n ore was it purchased by the AF.

Yes, you ******* ****, the shorter is in the article you have read.

Game.  Set.  **** Match.  Now run to mommy.  Maybe she will give you a hug.

You have never shown a single citation confirming an independent design for the Sporter. You decline to answer the question of its appearance in the citation to which you refer.

Because you have no case, your posts are littered with cowardly evasions and ejaculations.

Take the L and a fistful of Midols.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You have never shown a single citation confirming an independent design for the Sporter. You decline to answer the question of its appearance in the citation to which you refer.

Because you have no case, your posts are littered with cowardly evasions and ejaculations.

Take the L and a fistful of Midols.

I certainly have.  All the Changs to the lower I posted so you could not use M 16 parts.  Stop lying ****.

Huh?  Are you a stupid ****? Yes, it is in the article you have read.  Again, for the short bus BV crown, it is in the **** civilian list a the article to which I refer.  

I **** own ****.  That is why you daughter wanted to sleep with me.

Take your lying *** out of here before I kick you in the nuts.
 

*Huey » Today, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:36 pm

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:32 pm

*Huey » Today, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:29 pm

If you are going to keep lying about I have to keep proving what a loser you are.

The fact of the matter is the Weapons the AF bought were not Semi Automatic rifles.  

The shorter is not on the military list.  It is on the civilian list.  You lose. That is why you are running like Daddy's Lil ****** from the challenge in my sig box.

Does the Sporter appear in the article which begins

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
 


 

I already answered that as well.  The lists being discussed are in that article, ****.  When I say the Sporter is on the CIVILIAN LIST I **** ASSUMED that after all these years of you ignorantly posting that you would have read the article.  It is obvious you have not read it.

*Huey » Today, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:29 pm

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:26 pm

That's a not answer, obviously.


If you insist you've already answered, why do I need to do anything?



Age related cognitive decline...



 

If you are going to keep lying about I have to keep proving what a loser you are.

The fact of the matter is the Weapons the AF bought were not Semi Automatic rifles.  

The shorter is not on the military list.  It is on the civilian list.  You lose. That is why you are running like Daddy's Lil ****** from the challenge in my sig box.


 

**** off you ignorant waste of a Payday ****.

 

Try again you waste of a Payday ****.

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I certainly have.  All the Changs to the lower I posted 

Words have meaning, even if you don't believe it.

Modification may involve design, but it it not a "design" in the context of firearms.

Not a single citation even suggests an independent development of the weapon. 

*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Try again you waste of a Payday ****.

No need.

I can read the introduction to the citation, and I understand it.
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Words have meaning, even if you don't believe it.

Modification may involve design, but it it not a "design" in the context of firearms.

Not a single citation even suggests an independent development of the weapon.

Yes, and the portion I posted used the words design change.  

I am not posting it again.  You have proven YOU DO NOT read the information that is given to you.  And I am. not making any deals with.  You do not honor them,

When the answer the challenge, involving the source of the citation you are ignorant using, then you claim victory.  Until, you are the biggest loser.

Run, ******, Run.

I won and I am done with the discussion until man up and answer the challenge.  You ain't ****, ******.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

No need.

I can read the introduction to the citation, and I understand it.

And you stopped there. I am taking victory and leaving this discussion until you answer the challenge linked in my sig box.  The link with BV's shorter loss.  Run, ******, Run.  I see one more post.

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Yes, and the portion I posted used the words design change.  

I am not posting it again.  


 

The reason you aren't posting it again is because I'll make you run from it.


Like a bitch...

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

And you stopped there. I am taking victory 

No, I didn't. 

But it indicates that what follows the introduction will be a listing of said variants.

is the Sporter listed?

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

No, I didn't. 

But it indicates that what follows the introduction will be a listing of said variants.

is the Sporter listed?

My Last word.  If the Shorter all the different models and designs were designed for the military and combat there would not be at least two lists.  

I gotta know.  Are you **** retarded?  How many times must I tell you that the Shorter is listed on the CIVILIAN list.  NOT the combat military list.

 

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

My Last word.  

Just answer the question, don't presume to rewrite the citation.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Just answer the question, don't presume to rewrite the citation.

The question was answered you retarded waste of a payday ****

WIth that said, Retard, no further discussion will occur until you found your balls and answer the challenge:

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

If you answer them honestly I will still take the 5 days off.

If you prove me wrong, I will take July off.
Don't be scared.  You know, this kind of pussiness on your end is why your physical threats are laughable.

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

The question was answered 

Don't be vague, Tiny..

It's a yes or no question. 

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

The question was answered you retarded waste of a payday ****

WIth that said, Retard, no further discussion will occur until you found your balls and answer the challenge:

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

If you answer them honestly I will still take the 5 days off.

If you prove me wrong, I will take July off.
Don't be scared.  You know, this kind of pussiness on your end is why your physical threats are laughable.

I don't see a single citation in your challenge..

Not one.

And you don't answer direct questions about citations.


The hydrogen bomb is designed for combat. I'm willing to bet you weren't hauling one on your HALO jump.


 

Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

*Huey » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

The question was answered you retarded waste of a payday ****

WIth that said, Retard, no further discussion will occur until you found your balls and answer the challenge:

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

If you answer them honestly I will still take the 5 days off.

If you prove me wrong, I will take July off.
Don't be scared.  You know, this kind of pussiness on your end is why your physical threats are laughable.

I don't see a single citation in your challenge..

Not one.

And you don't answer direct questions about citations.


The hydrogen bomb is designed for combat. I'm willing to bet you weren't hauling one on your HALO jump.


 

 

Stop lying, ****:

The question was answered you retarded waste of a payday ****

WIth that said, Retard, no further discussion will occur until you found your balls and answer the challenge:

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

If you answer them honestly I will still take the 5 days off.

If you prove me wrong, I will take July off.
Don't be scared.  You know, this kind of pussiness on your end is why your physical threats are laughable.