WTF does that drivel mean, son?
Cannonpointer » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ WTF does that drivel mean, son?
Are you saying that you would be cool with Russia overthrowing Mexico's democracy and planting a coup government to join its alliance for the purpose of putting it's missiles on our border? That's a yes no - not a please drool.
Or are you merely saying incomprehensible drunken **** to APPEAR to respond without responding?
I made a very specific argument. Would you care to address it - in English?
Cannonpointer » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ WTF does that drivel mean, son?
Are you saying that you would be cool with Russia overthrowing Mexico's democracy and planting a coup government to join its alliance for the purpose of putting it's missiles on our border? That's a yes no - not a please drool.
Or are you merely saying incomprehensible drunken **** to APPEAR to respond without responding?
I made a very specific argument. Would you care to address it - in English?
I am super Hegsethed this morning.. Lost contact with reality last night.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ WTF does that drivel mean, son?
Are you saying that you would be cool with Russia overthrowing Mexico's democracy and planting a coup government to join its alliance for the purpose of putting it's missiles on our border? That's a yes no - not a please drool.
Or are you merely saying incomprehensible drunken **** to APPEAR to respond without responding?
I made a very specific argument. Would you care to address it - in English?
Instinctive honesty debunks every think outside the box narrative life exceeds adapting to the moment here governing every great great grandchild that became/becomes 1 of 16 great great grandparents in 4 more generation gaps forward from now here as one of a kind ancestors making up 8.1 billion inhabitants of this species.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Get REAL clear, fool. Russia has the capacity to end Ukraine's civilian population - quickly and brutally.
The same people informing you on this issue inform you on issues of gender, squirrel.
No wonder you sided with the biden-pelosi position. You're a secret squirrel traany ***.
No offense, tranny supporting progtard.
Cannonpointer » 01 Jun 2025, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ June 3, 2025 - Breaking News.
Y'all are free to laugh if I am wrong - BUT ONLY IF YOU CALL ME AN IDIOT FOR MAKING THIS PREDICTION.
If not, your laughter will be PG'd off the thread.
Anyone care to wager?
Yeah, I just never said that.JohnnyYou » Today, 5:09 am » wrote: ↑ I am super Hegsethed this morning.. Lost contact with reality last night.
It was great to be diverted from the Trumphookupalots for a few hours.
Man the shyt is getting bad...
You had me going that Putin attacked NATO warships the other day.. Only you seem to know about it.
Besides sypphilis, what danger do you suppose that braying hyena posed to anyone except children?JohnnyYou » Today, 5:50 am » wrote: ↑ The Pakistani at the beer store agreed we are working our way into red balloonitis.
Had Kamala Wala Won Putin would be gone by now.
Missed it by that muchCannonpointer » Yesterday, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ My prediction was entirely incorrect. The third has come and gone in that part of the world. Well, not quite - but it's pretty obvious my prediction was wrong. I guess I have until midnight, eh? That's four hours from now in Moscow and Kyiv.
I thought for sure he would just wipe out their capitol for that. Coupkraine is a beard for NATO - a mask.Those shaved apes had nothing to do with the actions inside Russia. Hell, they were an incompetent kleptocracy BEFORE they became NATO's captive stooge.
No, it was all NATO from soup to nuts. My gamble was that Putin would destroy Ukraine's government in order to unmask NATO - to deprive NATO of a green t-shirt to hide behind.
I underestimated his patience. His game is far above my ability to analyze. He's playing on multiple chess boards. The man is a grand master.
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ My prediction was entirely incorrect. The third has come and gone in that part of the world. Well, not quite - but it's pretty obvious my prediction was wrong. I guess I have until midnight, eh? That's four hours from now in Moscow and Kyiv.
I thought for sure he would just wipe out their capitol for that. Coupkraine is a beard for NATO - a mask.Those shaved apes had nothing to do with the actions inside Russia. Hell, they were an incompetent kleptocracy BEFORE they became NATO's captive stooge.
No, it was all NATO from soup to nuts. My gamble was that Putin would destroy Ukraine's government in order to unmask NATO - to deprive NATO of a green t-shirt to hide behind.
I underestimated his patience. His game is far above my ability to analyze. He's playing on multiple chess boards. The man is a grand master.
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ If Russia overthrew the government of Mexico and planted a coup government and moved missiles to our border, everyone on this board knows that you would sing a different tune.
You're a ****** and a not man for your hypocrisy.
naw....that's you all's deal.JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you wish you were a pedo two?
https://youtu.be/z5TygDcW3Yo?si=lh7US1Yi9c4FyWXI
DeezerShoove » Today, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it isn't as complicated as all that. They have to regroup because losing a big piece of their military array has left them weaker. Any escalation/retribution may bring more attacks to have to deal with. The Russians have to assess, reallocate, make a different plan. All this takes time.
Once the sting from the punch in the nose is gone, I think it's game on, ****.
It's just practical rather than masterful.
Given that he contradicts himself literally daily, I don't think that anyone is listening to anything he says, outside of the people who believe he is the Second Coming. They're goldfish.Mrkelly » Today, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Missed it by that much
wont be long, according to a recent tRump truth
“I just finished speaking, by telephone, with President Vladimir Putin, of Russia. The call lasted approximately one hour and 15 minutes. We discussed the attack on Russia’s docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides. It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields. We also discussed Iran, and the fact that time is running out on Iran’s decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly! I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement. President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion. It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!””
I don't think so. I agree that his tentativeness is born of caution - like a guy who got knocked down and is gathering his wits and assessing his circumstances. He' sniffing the air, and he's focusing on blocking any future such strikes.DeezerShoove » Today, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it isn't as complicated as all that. They have to regroup because losing a big piece of their military array has left them weaker. Any escalation/retribution may bring more attacks to have to deal with. The Russians have to assess, reallocate, make a different plan. All this takes time.
Once the sting from the punch in the nose is gone, I think it's game on, ****.
It's just practical rather than masterful.
A murderous ELECTED dictator, weakness.
I see that I congratulated you too soon - the growth spurt was a mirage, biden clone.
At the onset you strongly stated this was a NATO strike. Not my call; your call.Cannonpointer » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I don't think so. I agree that his tentativeness is born of caution - like a guy who got knocked down and is gathering his wits and assessing his circumstances. He' sniffing the air, and he's focusing on blocking any future such strikes.
Where I disagree is that the strike weakened him against Coupkraine. Against NATO, in an all-out, absolutely. But the **** he hit was nukular. Putin hasn't relied on, and doesn't plan to rely on, nukular weapons with Coupkraine. If he does decide to go nukular,those bombers will be redundant.