I tend to not bother reading anything posted on Wikipedia, that said he's just playing semantic at this point.*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Actually, on that topic Wikipedia did a pretty good job. The problem is BV is too **** ignorant to understand what it is telling him.
Which article do you insist I don't understand, Verbal?*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ It is a shame you are not smart enough to understand that article. Well, you were a legacy admission.
No, I'm fluent in English, and possess high level reading skills.*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Actually, on that topic Wikipedia did a pretty good job. The problem is BV is too **** ignorant to understand what it is telling him.
Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2025, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Which article do you insist I don't understand, Verbal?
Cedar » 06 Jun 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I tend to not bother reading anything posted on Wikipedia, that said he's just playing semantic at this point.
I struggle to find a question you aren't too much of a quimm to answer.*Huey » 06 Jun 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ This must be a clarification question. Do I get five days to answer it like you do?
You have been beaten 7 ways to Sunday on this topic. But by all means, continue.
No, Joe Biden has not claimed to be a plumber. His career is in politics, starting as a U.S. Senator and now serving as the President of the United States. He was involved in crafting many federal crime laws, including the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. He also chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee and Foreign Relations Committee
Funny they don't mention that he was a truck driver and worked in the mines too. What do you think?BuckNaked » 06 Jun 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Joe Biden has not claimed to be a plumber. His career is in politics, starting as a U.S. Senator and now serving as the President of the United States. He was involved in crafting many federal crime laws, including the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. He also chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee and Foreign Relations Committee
MR-7 » 06 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny they don't mention that he was a truck driver and worked in the mines too. What do you think?
Oh...it's true!
Don't ever doubt me Buck...
MR-7 » 06 Jun 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't ever doubt me Buck...
While running for president in 2008, Biden told the United Mine Workers that he was a coal miner.
“I hope you won’t hold it against me, but I am a hard-coal miner, anthracite coal, Scranton, Pennsylvania,” Biden said. “It’s nice to be back in coal country. It’s a different accent [in Virginia], but it’s the same deal. We were taught that our faith and our family was the only really important thing, and our faith and our family informed everything we did.”
The Biden campaign later told the AP that his comment was a “joke.” But it echoed another false claim he had made about coming from a family of coal miners during his 1988 campaign.
In a 1988 speech, Biden referred to “my ancestors, who worked in the coal mines of Northeast Pennsylvania and would come up after 12 hours and play football for four hours.” That line was plagiarized from a speech by British politician Neil Kinnock, whose family actually did work in the mines.In 2004, Biden acknowledged that he did not have family members who worked in mining.
Another lie Buck.
Amazing phoolks can walk like a woman and talk like a man
No Buck...he's a liberal.
You have just been equated to BlaVe. He picked two posters he feels are on a similar intellectual footing.Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ BV's opportunity to up his game came and went. A man only has so many offramps from cowardice. Every ramp he misses makes the next one harder to take - because each time, he has more **** to clean up than last time. Before long, he can't even see the offramps - they become an irrelevancy.
Let me give you an example. He knows **** well he backed the wrong horse on the tranny ****. There's not a man in America who believes that men should share prison cells with women. Or batter shelters. Or boxing rings. Or sporting fields. Or showers and dressing rooms. But he took the affirmative on that issue, because THAT was price of a seat at the cool kids' table.
I can assure you he wishes from his crown to his tiny feet that he had not gone whole hog on the issue. But now he is stuck. And the level of integrity it takes to get out of the mess would have prevented him from getting into it. And he has handed everyone on this board - I'm talking people with MAYBE two fingers of forehead - a trump card to dismiss any judgment that he offers. "I see it this way" can be dismissed with, "You think women have penises." Because that is the actual position that he took.
Any pretense of respect for science can be countered with the fact that he believes it to be "science" that "I am because I SAY I am." And that is actually the very embodiment of an authority fallacy - it's anti-science.
Now, you tell me how a worm like that, carrying that **** behind him like a bag-o-shame, can up his game? There's just one way. He has to own it. He has to own it, and foreswear it. He has to say that he was wrong, and he has to declaim that ****. And his fragile ego will never allow that. And you want the truth? He's an educated midwit. A midwit with a degree from a good school is a midwit. He's got a couple of tricks, and he plays one of them incessantly: the panty dance. Stall, demand answers to rhetorical questions, evade. No one respects him - nor should anyone.
JohnnyYou » 06 Jun 2025, 9:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Never sucked your tit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNwC0sp ... TE&index=2