I cite you when you're right. Or, "rarely."Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So much for your high pygmy pony.
And citing @*HooooeyVagina?
All rhetorical roads lead to non existent public women's showers...
Excatly, fruitcake. THAT is precisely how you avoid arguing issues. Glad you were stupid tenough to gift me a present example.Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ All rhetorical roads lead to non existent public women's showers...
Yea ”nonexistent”Blackvegetable » Today, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ All rhetorical roads lead to non existent public women's showers...
If you really were a gym goer and a student athlete you would know that women use the women's showers....Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ All rhetorical roads lead to non existent public women's showers...
You never did, Coward.*Beekeeper » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You asked NO QUESTION, ASSHOLE. And I don't answer ANY of your questions ever again
Do you invent more LIES you can tell while you try to sleep???
If I don't answer questions, why are you so bitter?*Beekeeper » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Do you invent more LIES you can tell while you try to sleep???
Want to know who NEVER ANSWERS QUESTIONS??
That would be YOU, the FORUM QUEEF!!
Sucks, huh, ASSHOLE??
https://i.postimg.cc/5yT7qRgK/Trump-Pre ... inting.jpg
You cited THIS @*HooooeyVagina?
I had to lie to do it, but hey, I get to do that for a living.
I have disputed objective fact.
Do you do this **** in front of a mirror?Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Excatly, fruitcake. THAT is precisely how you avoid arguing issues. Glad you were stupid tenough to gift me a present example.
Because you could not defend men invading women's public showers, you insisted that there is no such thing as a public shower.
You battle good sense with nonsense. You're a flake.
When you see your reflection do you look at what you become since conceived or who you think you should have been since birth?
That only happened in the world where "I am because I SAY I am" is "science," Pookie.
Fer sure...Cannonpointer » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That only happened in the world where "I am because Funk&Wagnall's SAY I am" is "science," Pookie.
In the adult world, not so much.
Is that rhetorical? Do you HAVE anything?
Vegas » 03 Jun 2025, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Either A, B, C, or D.
Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.
or
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Fer sure because you SAY fer sure, toddler.
So is @Blackvegetable . But I am not giving him the answer until he tries first. I helped him last time. He is on his own now. Lol
I know the answer..Vegas » Today, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ So is @Blackvegetable . But I am not giving him the answer until he tries first. I helped him last time. He is on his own now. Lol
How did you help?. I helped him last time.