Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑Stop right there. It is not what I refer to to as the Verdict form. It is named "Verdict From. Nod.Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑This doesn't require translation.Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Just to be clear, your new line of argument is the Verdict Form did no say
Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
and the the choice of No was checked?
I expect you will both from that.
Here it is again:
Sure looks like it does to me. Run, Forrest, Run.
But what you refer to as the "verdict form" is a FINDING, not a VERDICT.Carrol's complaint didn't seek damages for "rape". Accordingly it couldn't have been a factor explicitly rejected by the verdict. If determining if all he was accused of was "rape", as defined by NY statute, and the jury found otherwise it would have no grounds to award for Sexual.Battery. But it did. In the amount of 2 million. Which is the reason Kaplan was obliged to opine.
rather than waste time with your version, tell me what you fail to understand...
TO be clear you agree that is DOES IN FACT CONTAIN this:
Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
and the the choice of No was checked?
Meaning no Jury found he raped Carroll.
For the record Digital Penetration (which you referred to as digital rape to muddy the story) was not considered Rape under NY Law.
STFU. You are too stupid to post here.
Sorry, not playing that game today. On the Verdict Form the jury absolutely found the following:Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑You are wrong...Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
and the the choice of No was checked?
I posted the relevant sentences from Judge Kaplan's opinion on Rule 49..
Post the part with which you continue to struggle
The Facts Game?
Try again. Too Far, there is no context where you could ever kick my ***. You run and hide too much. I accept my W on what the VERDICT FORM said.Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑The Facts Game?
Take your *** whipping and run off to huddle.
Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑Stop right there. It is not what I refer to to as the Verdict form. It is named "Verdict From. Nod.Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑
This doesn't require translation.
But what you refer to as the "verdict form" is a FINDING, not a VERDICT.Carrol's complaint didn't seek damages for "rape". Accordingly it couldn't have been a factor explicitly rejected by the verdict. If determining if all he was accused of was "rape", as defined by NY statute, and the jury found otherwise it would have no grounds to award for Sexual.Battery. But it did. In the amount of 2 million. Which is the reason Kaplan was obliged to opine.
rather than waste time with your version, tell me what you fail to understand...
TO be clear you agree that is DOES IN FACT CONTAIN this:
Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
and the the choice of No was checked?
Meaning no Jury found he raped Carroll.
For the record Digital Penetration (which you referred to as digital rape to muddy the story) was not considered Rape under NY Law.
STFU. You are too stupid to post here.
Sorry, not playing that game today. On the Verdict Form the jury absolutely found the following:Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑You are wrong...Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
and the the choice of No was checked?
I posted the relevant sentences from Judge Kaplan's opinion on Rule 49..
Post the part with which you continue to struggle
Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
the choice of No was checked?
That is 100% fact. Bye.
It is done...
Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You are wrong...
I posted the relevant sentences from Judge Kaplan's opinion on Rule 49..
Post the part with which you continue to struggle

SIMON SAYS....Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ It is done...
You may point out any part you don't understand.

InformationYou cannot edit posts in this forum.Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑It is done...
You may point out any part you don't understand.
Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑
Sorry, not playing that game today. On the Verdict Form the jury absolutely found the following:
Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
the choice of No was checked?
That is 100% fact. Bye.
Sorry, not playing that game today.
Stop running from all your yaps, Standless....
You have not told me what obliged Kaplan to opine..
Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑
Sorry, not playing that game today. On the Verdict Form the jury absolutely found the following:
Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
the choice of No was checked?
That is 100% fact. Bye.
Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑
I am not running from anything. You are running from what I actually said. That is the game I am not playing.
Once you acknowledge that the Verdict Form is saying the jury did not find him liable for rate you may than make your case about Kaplan.
Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑You have not told me what obliged Kaplan to opine..Huey » 08 Feb 2026, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑I am not running from anything. You are running from what I actually said. That is the game I am not playing.
Once you acknowledge that the Verdict Form is saying the jury did not find him liable for rate you may than make your case about Kaplan
This is what AI says about my explanation.
Your statement falls into the higher levels of Bloom's Taxonomy because it moves beyond simply recalling facts to constructing a reasoned legal argument and critiquing a specific judicial interpretation.
Now tell me what you don't understand.
Buck » wrote:boooooomHuey » 08 Feb 2026, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑
Sorry, not playing that game today. On the Verdict Form the jury absolutely found the following:
Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
1. Mr Trump raped Ms Carroll?
the choice of No was checked?
That is 100% fact. Bye.
Stop telling me what you will, or will not, do.
because you Kaplan **** is a diversion from what the Jury found.