Liberal Forum

Obama's proposed budget cuts could force roughly 90,000 servicemen and women to seek civilian jobs. So.
What pisses me off is he is cutting experienced officers and replacing them with illegals!

Fantasy thread

Cannonpointer » 18 Oct 2014 10:18 pm » wrote: You really are a **** idiot, clemtard.

And just to put my claim in perspective, a different troll was claiming that there was an extensive list of at least important legislation that Repubs had killed.

About which supposedly Repubs had destroyed the Obama presidency.

My comment was never about a few minor issues barely noticeable even to knowledgeable political observers.

So once again, the psychotic is, well, psychotic.

RichClem » 19 Oct 2014 10:49 am » wrote: And just to put my claim in perspective, a different troll was claiming that there was an extensive list of at least important legislation that Repubs had killed.

About which supposedly Repubs had destroyed the Obama presidency.

My comment was never about a few minor issues barely noticeable even to knowledgeable political observers.

So once again, the psychotic is, well, psychotic.

but hoping that people whose crime is not agreeing with the dedicated liar clemscum deserve to be raped by a pack of wild dogs is the action of a sane human?
how the **** can this worm claim to be qualified to judge who is psychotic? clemscum is subhuman ****

"Rotsa Ruck." Is the greatest rebuttal I've ever heard.

TotallyRad » 19 Oct 2014 1:40 pm » wrote:"Rotsa Ruck." Is the greatest rebuttal I've ever heard.

It's not a rebuttal, moonbat.

It's ridicule, because moonbats almost never answer the question or the challenge.

RichClem » 19 Oct 2014 1:47 pm » wrote: It's not a rebuttal, moonbat.

It's ridicule, because moonbats almost never answer the question or the challenge.

You were directly challenged and you let others do the heavy lifting for you. Pretty non-committal of you.

TotallyRad » 19 Oct 2014 4:22 pm » wrote: You were directly challenged and you let others do the heavy lifting for you. Pretty non-committal of you.

Another moonbat who's too lazy to actually read the posts.

RichClem » 19 Oct 2014 4:27 pm » wrote: Another moonbat who's too lazy to actually read the posts.

Oh, I read them with great laughter. Cannonpointer called you out and you did the same old "moonbat" argument as if that was effective.

RichClem » 19 Oct 2014 10:49 am » wrote:
And just to put my claim in perspective, a different troll was claiming that there was an extensive list of at least important legislation that Repubs had killed.

About which supposedly Repubs had destroyed the Obama presidency.

My comment was never about a few minor issues barely noticeable even to knowledgeable political observers.

So once again, the psychotic is, well, psychotic.

I bitch-slapped a hack with a top tn list that I shoved all the way down his cock intake valve.

The punk challenged another poster to name ONE PROPOSAL Obiewan had suggested OR supported that was bipartisan.

I shoved ten up his *** - and many of those numbers were MULTIPLES. And I never mentions killing Bush family friend bin Laden, who was allowed to "escape" at Tora Bora - or the SEALs killing the pirates of penzance - or a number of other things that would have met the dullard's challenge.

OOOPS! Retardo-Clem busted foot in mouth and head in *** AGAIN.

Shameless and closet gay - that's clemmie.

RichClem » 19 Oct 2014 10:27 am » wrote:
Bulls***. He sent one third the number of troops his own military recommended, maybe one half. I forget.

And a quagmire is caused by refusing to do what's necessary to win.

There ya go, queer. Good link.

And Bush was in Iraq for 7 years and refused to do what was necessary to win? Thanks, ***.

Glory Hole Clem » 19 Oct 2014 10:21 am » wrote:
I don't believe it. And even if true, it's overwhelmed by the way he's gutted the military beyond what even moderate Leon Panetta warned about as deeply dangerous.

No, queer. Your OWN LINK shows Panetta praised Obama's handling of the military - especially in restoring morale by returning to a policy of dealing honestly with people who enlist, - except that he found it TOO ambitious.

In that same link, Senator Tom Cruz, specifically praised Obama's handling of the military, stating that he was far better on using our forces wisely than was Bush, who Cruz said, "misused and overused our forces, leaving a broken military for President Obama to repair."

Cruz went on to say, "Obama has managed to put the military back into fighting shape, and has significantly improved morale across all branches of the military by dropping Bush's policy of lying to soldiers about deployment lengths and terms of service."

crimsongulf » 19 Oct 2014 10:46 am » wrote:Fantasy thread

THANK YOU!!!

Indeed - well said. Clemtard was truly in his My Little Pony fantasy world when he lied that no one could name a single thing the guy did that repukes agree with - good catch!

But so few on your side are honest or intelligent. Most would neve ardmit, as you willingly do, that Glory Hole was a **** idiot in fantasy land for telling that lie. Why IS that, do you suppose?

And the bathrooming - why do so many of your bedfellows - not you, but your friends - have sex in bathrooms?

Cannonpointer » 19 Oct 2014 4:57 pm » wrote: I bitch-slapped a hack with a top tn list that I shoved all the way down his cock intake valve.

The punk challenged another poster to name ONE PROPOSAL Obiewan had suggested OR supported that was bipartisan.

I shoved ten up his *** - and many of those numbers were MULTIPLES. And I never mentions killing Bush family friend bin Laden, who was allowed to "escape" at Tora Bora - or the SEALs killing the pirates of penzance - or a number of other things that would have met the dullard's challenge.

OOOPS! Retardo-Clem busted foot in mouth and head in *** AGAIN.

Shameless and closet gay - that's clemmie.

..


Babble all you want, you silly twit.


No one with any common sense takes you seriously.

RichClem » 19 Oct 2014 10:49 am » wrote: My comment was never about a few minor issues barely noticeable even to knowledgeable political observers.

But here's the thing, homo. If that were all I had given you, then you'd have every right to call ****. But extending the Bush tax cuts was NOT a small matter. It cost him with his base, and it was something the talkers on your side spent MONTHS of teevee time on, cumulatively, It was an issue in all of your publications and websites on all of the Sunday chats.

Heritage produced talking points on the issue of extending those cuts - which included referring to a failure to extend those temporary cuts as "raising taxes," - and talking heads from the right made the rounds, parroting those talking points. FOR YOU TO NOW PRETEND that the issue was "minor," and "barely noticeable even to knowledgeable political observers" is simply you being a liar, you verminous little creep.

RichClem » 19 Oct 2014 6:00 pm » wrote: ..

Babble all you want, you silly twit.

No one with any common sense takes you seriously.

now the appeal to the authority of common sense, as if he has established himself the arbiter of common sense. this is hollow empty ****. THAT is what clemmy touts as quality debating technique.
he is certainly not an authority on how to hide ****. his trivial crap is dangling from the end of my line in plain sight.
it is just plain dishonesty. clear pretense

Cannonpointer » 19 Oct 2014 6:10 pm » wrote: But here's the thing, homo. If that were all I had given you, then you'd have every right to call ****. But extending the Bush tax cuts was NOT a small matter. It cost him with his base, and it was something the talkers on your side spent MONTHS of teevee time on, cumulatively, It was an issue in all of your publications and websites on all of the Sunday chats.

Heritage produced talking points on the issue of extending those cuts - which included referring to a failure to extend those temporary cuts as "raising taxes," - and talking heads from the right made the rounds, parroting those talking points. FOR YOU TO NOW PRETEND that the issue was "minor," and "barely noticeable even to knowledgeable political observers" is simply you being a liar, you verminous little creep.

I never claimed the "issue" was minor. His role on it was unquestionably minor.

And moonbat, he vehemently opposed those tax cuts when Bush was asking for them, and I don't recall he expressed one single word to re-enact them until just before the deal was cut.

He was basically silent on the issue until just before that. Did he for months or even weeks demand they be re-enacted and stress how important they were to economic growth? No, because that would have revealed his previous lies.

And why would his most of his base oppose tax cuts for the middle class? They're wackier than even I thought.

But gosh, he was intimidated by the evil, all-powerful Heritage Foundation? Ooooh!

Cannonpointer » 19 Oct 2014 5:58 pm » wrote: THANK YOU!!!

Indeed - well said. Clemtard was truly in his My Little Pony fantasy world when he lied that no one could name a single thing the guy did that repukes agree with - good catch!

That was in the context of that troll claiming that Repubs had destroyed his presidency.

Of course there are a few minor issues on which they agreed. I've named the Colombian Free Trade bill myself.

Stupid freaking troll.

Cannonpointer » 19 Oct 2014 5:53 pm » wrote: No, queer. Your OWN LINK shows Panetta praised Obama's handling of the military - especially in restoring morale by returning to a policy of dealing honestly with people who enlist, - except that he found it TOO ambitious.

In that same link, Senator Tom Cruz, specifically praised Obama's handling of the military, stating that he was far better on using our forces wisely than was Bush, who Cruz said, "misused and overused our forces, leaving a broken military for President Obama to repair."

Cruz went on to say, "Obama has managed to put the military back into fighting shape, and has significantly improved morale across all branches of the military by dropping Bush's policy of lying to soldiers about deployment lengths and terms of service."

Say it ain't so! Not the Cruzman!

Clem is fumbling with the noose as we speak.

greatnpowerfuloz » 19 Oct 2014 7:07 pm » wrote: Say it ain't so! Not the Cruzman!

Clem is fumbling with the noose as we speak.

.

Another moonbat too freaking lazy or stupid to follow the dispute.