I wasn’t stationed there. Just passing thru.Cedar » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I can still remember the obnoxious smell of kudzu, running PT at 6 am.![]()
Post the thread title...
He should have renamed it Ft. Jefferson Davis - of course, to honor Master Sargent Jefferson Donald Davis who was posthumously awarded the Silver Star for gallantry in the face of overwhelming odds and direct hostile aggression directly contributing to the success of both Chairman Hamid Karzai and the America's defeat of Taliban forces in Afghanistan.*Huey » Yesterday, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Although those associated with the military never really changed.
They can't even get the role of the Federal Troops correct. They are there to do two things. Protect federal buildings and Ice agents doing their Job. That's it. They have no arrest powers. They can detain protestors at the spot and call the cops. Once the cops show the detained are set free and the cops decide what to do.ConservativeWave » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑The BIGGER issue however... is that IN SPITE of all the Democrats SPEWING LIES, and attacking Trump on his immigration policies... MOST (Multiple) polls have him FAR ahead of Democrats (and Democrat policies)... at a rate of WELL over 50% (i.e. 50- 58%) of Americans supporting him... with Democrat support in the 30's low 40%, and the rest aren't sure !*Huey » Today, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ In addition to cool cars being attacked in LA this happened in Brooklyn, NY:Undetonated explosives found in and around charred NYPD vehicles in Brooklyn
https://abc7ny.com/post/8-police-vehicl ... /16729909/
ADD TO THAT, the FACT that immigration was among the TOP issues for American voters (that and the economy)... and the Democrats have GOT to be BRAIN DEAD to be fighting Trump on this... BUT, "cest-la-vie" !!
AND, it's TOO LATE for Democrats to change positions now... ANYWAy ! It will likely only make their "trust" factor EVEN LOWER among voters !!
Nope, For the following reason:Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Post it.*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I know the thread title. It is my thread. Plus, you can see above your avatar box. Of you can just get straight to the point. I have showed you how a man does it.
Here is how a man would do it:
"You thread title is (enter thread title) and this and the issue......."
*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I know the thread title. It is my thread. Plus, you can see above your avatar box. Of you can just get straight to the point. I have showed you how a man does it.
Here is how a man would do it:
"You thread title is (enter thread title) and this and the issue......."
In addition to BV's aversion to honoring Silver Star recipients this would really put his panties in a snit. They would probably get caught on his tampon string.Skans » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑He should have renamed it Ft. Jefferson Davis - of course, to honor Master Sargent Jefferson Donald Davis who was posthumously awarded the Silver Star for gallantry in the face of overwhelming odds and direct hostile aggression directly contributing to the success of both Chairman Hamid Karzai and the America's defeat of Taliban forces in Afghanistan.*Huey » Yesterday, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Although those associated with the military never really changed.
I just love the sound of that "Ft. Jefferson Davis". I know there is already a Fort Jefferson in the Dry Tortugas, but its inactive.*Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In addition to BV's aversion to honoring Silver Star recipients this would really put his panties in a snit. They would probably get caught on his tampon string.
We used to have this in Va:Skans » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I just love the sound of that "Ft. Jefferson Davis". I know there is already a Fort Jefferson in the Dry Tortugas, but its inactive.*Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In addition to BV's aversion to honoring Silver Star recipients this would really put his panties in a snit. They would probably get caught on his tampon string.
Stop right there.
*Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Nope, For the following reason:Blackvegetable » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Post it.*Huey » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I know the thread title. It is my thread. Plus, you can see above your avatar box. Of you can just get straight to the point. I have showed you how a man does it.
Here is how a man would do it:
"You thread title is (enter thread title) and this and the issue......."
1. On principle because every time ANYONE replies the title is posted.
2. You edited another quote. I told you. AIn't gonna happen happen when you do that. Be man.*Huey » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I know the thread title. It is my thread. Plus, you can see above your avatar box. Of you can just get straight to the point. I have showed you how a man does it.
Here is how a man would do it:
"You thread title is (enter thread title) and this and the issue......."
, just posted it again.
Nope. I know you are a spoiled lil princess but you are not going to get your way. It is now MY RULES or I sit back and laugh at your ignorant ***.
That's where I did AIT back in '82.
It's not about me...
Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee were common names for many schools in the south as well. Heck, until around 2000, Florida had a town called "*** Knoll, which appeared on the maps. The Liberals got that scrubbed.
*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑*Huey » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Nope, For the following reason:
1. On principle because every time ANYONE replies the title is posted.
2. You edited another quote. I told you. AIn't gonna happen happen when you do that. Be man.*Huey » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I know the thread title. It is my thread. Plus, you can see above your avatar box. Of you can just get straight to the point. I have showed you how a man does it.
Here is how a man would do it:
"You thread title is (enter thread title) and this and the issue......."
, just posted it again.
Nope. I know you are a spoiled lil princess but you are not going to get your way. It is now MY RULES or I sit back and laugh at your ignorant ***.
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑It's not about me...*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Nope, For the following reason:
1. On principle because every time ANYONE replies the title is posted.
2. You edited another quote. I told you. AIn't gonna happen happen when you do that. Be man.
It's about your cowardice.
*Huey » Today, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑
Nope. I know you are a spoiled lil princess but you are not going to get your way. It is now MY RULES or I sit back and laugh at your ignorant ***.
*Huey » Today, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑*Huey » Today, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑Nope, For the following reason:
1. On principle because every time ANYONE replies the title is posted.
2. You edited another quote. I told you. AIn't gonna happen happen when you do that. Be man.*Huey » Today, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑
I know the thread title. It is my thread. Plus, you can see above your avatar box. Of you can just get straight to the point. I have showed you how a man does it.
Here is how a man would do it:
"You thread title is (enter thread title) and this and the issue......."
, just posted it again.
Nope. I know you are a spoiled lil princess but you are not going to get your way. It is now MY RULES or I sit back and laugh at your ignorant ***.
Not sure what that pertains to, Princess. To clarify provide a link. Screen shots are for pussies.Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑*Huey » Today, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑
Nope. I know you are a spoiled lil princess but you are not going to get your way. It is now MY RULES or I sit back and laugh at your ignorant ***.
*Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Not sure what that pertains to, Princess. To clarify provide a link. Screen shots are for pussies.
The screenshot is evidence that you have no integrity, and that providing you links makes no difference.Screen shots are for pussies.