Probably. There hasn't ever been a question you've asked that I don't know the answer to.
Is that a golf tee you're clinching twixt those flabby glutes?Skans » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Probably. There hasn't ever been a question you've asked that I don't know the answer to.
Donald Trump's legal team did not have to petition any Court for relief from any award of damages for sexual assault. This is because Donald Trump has never been found by a court or jury to have ever sexually assaulted anyone. You were provided evidence proving what I just said.Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Is that a golf tee you're clinching twixt those flabby glutes?
Take a seat.
On what grounds did Team Grifty petition the Court for relief from the $2million awarded for sexual assault?
Skans » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Donald Trump's legal team did not have to petition any Court for relief from any award of damages for sexual assault. This is because Donald Trump has never been found by a court or jury to have ever sexually assaulted anyone. You were provided evidence proving what I just said.
BV, when the premise of your question contains a false narrative, the answer to that question will always be to discredit the question for containing a false set of facts that invalidates the premise of your question.
If you ever learn to ask a good question, then I and the other Conservatives on this forum may choose to further converse with you on a given topic. See BV, we call you "stupid", not because we don't like you, not because you toss insults around like every other typical Democrat, we call you stupid because you are.
(throttling this crap in utero)You were provided evidence proving what I just said.
Blackvegetable » Today, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Is that a golf tee you're clinching twixt those flabby glutes?
Take a seat.
On what grounds did Team Grifty petition the Court for relief from the $2million awarded for sexual assault?
No...it means exactly what it says...*Beekeeper » Today, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ And that means, you only want to play **** GAMES and actually have ZERO POINT TO MAKE!!
Blackvegetable » Today, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑No...it means exactly what it says...*Beekeeper » Today, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ And that means, you only want to play **** GAMES and actually have ZERO POINT TO MAKE!!
Look ASSHOLE, NO ONE is going to be playing your IDIOTIC GAMES anymore!!
You are the one grooming a shyt tater for leadership. Don't you have a tit on a scrotum to keep your mouth busy? Your beesknees are weak*Beekeeper » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Look ASSHOLE, NO ONE is going to be playing your IDIOTIC GAMES anymore!!
IF you have SOME POINT YOU WANT TO MAKE, post the thing you want to make it with. OTHERWISE, GO **** YOURSELF, POUND SAND, EAT **** AND JUSDT **** DIE!!
NO ONE is going to look up **** for you EVER AGAIN!!! IF YOU NEED TO POST SOMETHING TO MAKE A POINT, POST IT OR SHUT THE **** UP!!
@ROG62 @Vegas @Cannonpointer @RebelGator and Huey!!
Capisce??
Nod.
Reading and replying to this **** IDIOT would be a BEE explaining to a FLY why honey is better than ****!!JohnnyYou » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Johnny You, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
JHC this babbling *** idiot NEVER makes any sense! I guess that's what happens when you OD on Arab Jizz.JohnnyYou » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You are the one grooming a shyt tater for leadership. Don't you have a tit on a scrotum to keep your mouth busy? Your beesknees are weak
Admit that you have no idea, and I will tell you.*Beekeeper » 40 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Look ASSHOLE, NO ONE is going to be playing your IDIOTIC GAMES anymore!!
IF you have SOME POINT
I admit that your a child molesting son of a **** whore that needs to be removed.
Let's pretend that is true - that he is "grooming" Trump. It's ridiculous, of course. But let us pretend.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » Today, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Is that a golf tee you're clinching twixt those flabby glutes?
Take a seat.
On what grounds did Team Grifty petition the Court for relief from the $2million awarded for sexual assault?
And there you go, verifying that you are utterly immune to evidence.