He can't do it.*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Can't do it, huh, ASSHOLE??
You're a **** IDIOT!
https://i.postimg.cc/jdmqq138/BVs-Demands-Own-Work.jpg!
Then convince your fellow idiot to call my bluff.
U referring to anyone as an Idiot, is laughable. I mean, who did you vote for?
Answer the question, Coward.*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ Still can't find it to post, huh??
Never doubted that for ONE MILLISECOND!!
You're a **** IDIOT!!
Nod
Not the one whose appointees called him a moron, a **** moron, dumb as ****, with the IQ of an inbred tanning bed.MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ U referring to anyone as an Idiot, is laughable. I mean, who did you vote for?
So, you fell for the old "sharp as a tack" LIE. How gullible does one have to be?Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Not the one whose appointees called him a moron, a **** moron, dumb as ****, with the IQ of an inbred tanning bed.
You?
no luck getting you to stop running.*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ Still no luck, huh??
Keep trying ASSHOLE IDIOT!!!
YOUR WORDS....
I voted to protect the kids. I voted for the "Outlaw", not the kid SNIFFER.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Not the one whose appointees called him a moron, a **** moron, dumb as ****, with the IQ of an inbred tanning bed.
You?
Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ no luck getting you to stop running.
So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury’s $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll’s sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll’s] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.
This jury did not award Ms. Carroll more than $2 million for groping her breasts through her clothing, wrongful as that might have been. There was no evidence at all of such behavior. Instead, the proof convincingly established, and the jury implicitly found, that Mr. Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm. Mr. Trump’s argument therefore ignores the bulk of the evidence at trial, misinterprets the jury’s verdict, and mistakenly focuses on the New York Penal Law definition of “rape” to the exclusion of the meaning of that word as it often is used in everyday life and of the evidence of what actually occurred between Ms. Carroll and Mr. Trump.
There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s sexual assault damages
You voted for The Adjudicated Rapist...and this..MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ I voted to protect the kids. I voted for the "Outlaw", not the kid SNIFFER.
Fondler,
No...I looked at the results.MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ So, you fell for the old "sharp as a tack" LIE. How gullible does one have to be?
Great. How did that work out for you?
Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ Fondler,
This is why engaging you is a waste of time...you're a moron.
You only need to read it to understand that it is Judge Kaplan's response to the petition of which you were unaware...
It is from the document to which you repeatedly refer, but don't understand.
Do you need me to explain what it says?
Biden came in tied for 13th.
I only asked you to tell me the argument it made...*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ So, it's NOT THE PETITION that you DEMANDED BE POSTED!!
America voted to save the kids. You do know that BOTH your candidates (Dumb and Dumber) lost, right?
Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ Biden came in tied for 13th.
Grifty traled Buchanan, again.
