Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 9:39 am

 Do you believe Grifty will vault past Grifty in the rankings?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 9:44 am

 Do you believe Grifty will vault past Grifty in the rankings?

I haven't seen the rankings. Maybe u should post them.
 

MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 9:47 am

I haven't seen the rankings. Maybe u should post them.

https://presidentialgreatnessproject.com/

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 9:44 am

 Do you believe Grifty will vault past Grifty in the rankings?

The only survey and poll I give a **** bout occurred in November of last year.  

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 9:50 am

https://presidentialgreatnessproject.com/

You left this little bit out...LA Times, February 18, 2024: You mother **** are so STUPID. 

The 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey was conducted online via Qualtrics from November 15 to December 31, 2023. Respondents included current and recent members of the Presidents & Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association, which is the foremost organization of social science experts in presidential politics, as well as scholars who had recently published peer-reviewed academic research in key related scholarly journals or academic presses. 525 respondents were invited to participate, and 154 usable responses were received, yielding a 29.3% response rate.1

Here is the break-down of who participated in the bogus poll. What a FAILED poll. 

Partisan breakdown (2024)

• Democrats – 95
• Republicans – 15
• Independents/Others – 44
• Liberals – 98
• Conservatives – 20
• Moderates – 36

 

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:06 am

The only survey and poll I give a **** bout occurred in November of last year.

Ok...

Post the popular vote margin.


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:09 am

Ok...

Post the popular vote margin.

Posted.  The link is in my sig box and I bumped that thread yesterday.  But I can tell you Harris did not win the popular vote total.

Soemday you will learn we are not here to do your bidding.

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:11 am

Posted.  The link is in my sig box and I bumped that thread yesterday.  But I can tell you Harris did not win the popular vote total.

Soemday you will learn we are not here to do your bidding.

Don't get snippy...It's not as if I asked you to include your choice for POTUS. 

If you privilege the election as a poll or survey, you must report the actual responses of human beings, as no one sane polls dirt.

You turn severe self inflicted injury into performance art.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:20 am

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:11 am

Posted.  The link is in my sig box and I bumped that thread yesterday.  But I can tell you Harris did not win the popular vote total.

Soemday you will learn we are not here to do your bidding.

Don't get snippy...It's not as if I asked you to include your choice for POTUS. 

If you privilege the election as a poll or survey, you must report the actual responses of human beings, as no one sane polls dirt.

You turn severe self inflicted injury into performance art.
 

 

I did.  I bumped the thread which contains my post on the actual popular vote totals.  Keep running.  Or make your point, on your own.

MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:09 am

You left this little bit out...LA Times, February 18, 2024: You mother **** are so STUPID. 

The 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey was conducted online via Qualtrics from November 15 to December 31, 2023. Respondents included current and recent members of the Presidents & Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association, which is the foremost organization of social science experts in presidential politics, as well as scholars who had recently published peer-reviewed academic research in key related scholarly journals or academic presses. 525 respondents were invited to participate, and 154 usable responses were received, yielding a 29.3% response rate.1

Here is the break-down of who participated in the bogus poll. What a FAILED poll. 

Partisan breakdown (2024)

• Democrats – 95
• Republicans – 15
• Independents/Others – 44
• Liberals – 98
• Conservatives – 20
• Moderates – 36

It's my turn to ask a question. 


When survey respondents were limited to "conservatives" and "Republicans" what was the result for Grifty?

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:20 am

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:11 am

Posted.  The link is in my sig box and I bumped that thread yesterday.  But I can tell you Harris did not win the popular vote total.

Soemday you will learn we are not here to do your bidding.

Don't get snippy...It's not as if I asked you to include your choice for POTUS. 

If you privilege the election as a poll or survey, you must report the actual responses of human beings, as no one sane polls dirt.

You turn severe self inflicted injury into performance art.
 

 

viewtopic.php?p=2759841#p2759841

Have it..
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:09 am

Ok...

Post the popular vote margin.

Why? The only thing that wins the race is the electoral votes. Wonder how "sharp as a tack" lost 80 electoral votes from 2020. Care to tell us how many TRUMP gained?
 

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:22 am

I did.  I bumped the thread which contains my post on the actual popular vote totals.  Keep running.  Or make your point, on your own.

You weren't asked to bump a thread..

You were asked to post what you insist you care about.

Apparently you don't care that much.
 

MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:26 am

Why? The only thing that wins the race is the electoral votes. Wonder how "sharp as a tack" lost 80 electoral votes from 2020. Care to tell us how many TRUMP gained?

Because the dumb little **** specified SURVEYS and POLLS.

Now go help him pry his tit from that wringer, dumb little ****.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:26 am

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:22 am

I did.  I bumped the thread which contains my post on the actual popular vote totals.  Keep running.  Or make your point, on your own.

You weren't asked to bump a thread..

You were asked to post what you insist you care about.

Apparently you don't care that much.
 

 

I don't give a **** what you asked.  If you have a post on the popular vote that Harris lost go for it.  If you are to lazy,  STFU.  

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:28 am

I don't give a **** what you asked.  If you have a post on the popular vote that Harris lost go for it.  If you are to lazy,  STFU.

Run from your words..

It's what you do.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:28 am

Because the dumb little **** specified SURVEYS and POLLS.

Now go help him pry his tit from that wringer, dumb little ****.

It's very, and I mean very clear, that I have crushed you on your little LA Times poll. U R a loser, just like your TWO, not one, but TWO candidates that TRUMP beat by 80 electoral votes.
 

MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:33 am

It's very, and I mean very clear, that I have crushed you on your little LA Times poll. U R a loser, just like your TWO, not one, but TWO candidates that TRUMP beat by 80 electoral votes.

Stop squealing....Tiny's hurting.

Hurry!
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:29 am

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:28 am

I don't give a **** what you asked.  If you have a post on the popular vote that Harris lost go for it.  If you are to lazy,  STFU.

Run from your words..

It's what you do.

I am not running from may words.  There is a link to the popular vote totals in my sig box.  I bumped the post with the popular vote totals by replying to you.

I am NOT going to post the popular vote totals 3 or 4 times a week because you are too **** lazy to make your own point,   Nod.  Now, either make a point or keep on running.
 

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:36 am

I am not running from may words.  

I have disputed objective fact.