Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:39 am

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:36 am

I am not running from may words.  

I have disputed objective fact.

 

 

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:45 am

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:18 pm

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm

We know..

You keep lying about that comments when you specifically told it was typo.  It should read “I have NOT disputed objective fact”

Carry on…


 

*Huey » 09 Jul 2024, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 3:53 pm

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 3:52 pm

Your prattle is NEVER substitute for objective fact, nor can it ever qualify it.

Nod.

I have not disputed objective fact.   Boston Coward, your use of strike thru is validating my points.  And you keep lining out objective fact.

Before lining this out look at the port in bold and Italics.

Once again you lined to where I address your incumbent **** and tell you I accept the fact he is the incumbent.  You then turn around. lie about it, and run.  You are also pissed because I refuse to allow you to control this thread.

Try again Mary:

Dum Dum, I know he is the incumbent.   THat doesn't make him mentally fit.

What has you triggered is the sources you have relied on for years to keep the focus on Trump and ignore Biden is now telling you **** you don't want to hear. If the press had done their job he may not be the incumbent.  Right now your media is blaming the WH for a cover up.  I have seen the press conferences the past few days and they are pissed and don't trust the WH.
 
Actually, looking at the posts Meltdown Mary, you are the only one triggered.  This another of your tactics.

This is an objective fact.  

I already told you how stupid that Incumbent crap is.  Tell to your media, your politicians and your voters who don't think he is capable.

You have no say in it but your refuse to criticize the choice and you are defending it.  Another NoStand on your part.
 


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:39 am

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:36 am

I am not running from may words.  

I have disputed objective fact.

 


 

There s a reason you don't use links.  It is because you are dishonest.
 

 

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:47 am

nefarious101 » 17 Jun 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 11:20 am

MRkelly AKA Dribbles is getting real creepy

he's stalking me like a someone with a school girl crush

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 10:09 am

You left this little bit out...LA Times, February 18, 2024: You mother **** are so STUPID. 

The 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey was conducted online via Qualtrics from November 15 to December 31, 2023. Respondents included current and recent members of the Presidents & Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association, which is the foremost organization of social science experts in presidential politics, as well as scholars who had recently published peer-reviewed academic research in key related scholarly journals or academic presses. 525 respondents were invited to participate, and 154 usable responses were received, yielding a 29.3% response rate.1

Here is the break-down of who participated in the bogus poll. What a FAILED poll. 

Partisan breakdown (2024)

• Democrats – 95
• Republicans – 15
• Independents/Others – 44
• Liberals – 98
• Conservatives – 20
• Moderates – 36

Mrkelly » 17 Jun 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 11:31 am

  How about fox ?

Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Trump were more likely to be ranked higher by conservatives or Republicans, with Reagan being ranked an average of 5th by Republicans respondents, Bush 19th and Trump 41st. Among Democrat respondents, Reagan was rated an average of 18th, Bush 33rd and Trump 45th.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-presiden ... elow-biden

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2025, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2025, 6:03 am

*Beekeeper » 15 Jun 2025, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2025, 5:58 am

It must REALLY SUCK that someone MUCH smarter than you will ever be,

On what grounds did Team Grifty petition the Court?

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 9:09 am

*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 9:07 am

So, it's NOT THE PETITION that you DEMANDED BE POSTED!!

I only asked you to tell me the argument it made...

You were NEVER asked to link to their petition.

You're a coward, and a liar.

*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 12:50 pm

Well, DICKSUCKM, your little "decision" from Kaplin doesn't give us the ARGUMENT made to the court IN THE PETITION THAT WAS FILED!!

YOUR WORDS ABOVE, DICKSUCK!!

Now, where's that PETITION Trump filed that will ANSWER THE QUESTION of "on what grounds did Trump petition the court"!!

WIHTOUT THAT, you LOSE, ASSHOLE!!

You're a **** IDIOT!!

Nod!!

https://i.imgur.com/kXqiA9A.gif

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

*Beekeeper » 17 Jun 2025, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 12:50 pm

Well, DICKSUCKM, your little "decision" from Kaplin doesn't give us the ARGUMENT made to the court IN THE PETITION THAT WAS FILED!!

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:13 pm

No...not much

It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury’s $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll’s sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll’s] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6

**** idiot

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:20 pm

Can you say President Trump spanked the **** out of 13 and Harris?

LMAO!

MR-7 » 17 Jun 2025, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 12:53 pm

You have really crushed bv today BK.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:22 pm

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:20 pm

Can you say President Trump spanked the **** out of 13 and Harris?

LMAO!

Askholio?

 

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm

LMAO!  #13, 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:31 pm

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm

LMAO!  #13, 

How did your candidate fare?

 

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:37 pm

As expected.  


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:45 pm

That's quite vague.

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm

I am guessing 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:49 pm

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm

I am guessing 

No need.
You're a coward...

 

 

*Huey » 17 Jun 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 2:51 pm

You have