Liberal Forum

DeezerShoove » 13 Jun 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 10:50 am

Thanks for proving my point.

It's better than arguing with your 2 year old self:
ME! ME! ME!   NO! NO! NO!

Coozeleh, please..

That's a given




 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2025, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 11:05 am

Coozeleh, please..

That's a given

You never provided us with the evidence you claim exists in the E. Jean Crackpot trial.

I think it's because you know the evidence never existed. It was nothing more than a corrupt proceeding with kangaroos at ever turn.     

Bv was the moderator for those proceedings...and he trusted those involved...especially the judge.     lol



 
 

roadkill » 13 Jun 2025, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 11:29 am

You never provided us with the evidence you claim exists in the E. Jean Crackpot trial.

I think it's because you know the evidence never existed. It was nothing more than a corrupt proceeding with kangaroos at ever turn.     

Bv was the moderator for those proceedings...and he trusted those involved...especially the judge.     lol

PedoRoad, 

It was a jury trial.

It was never about you. It still isn't. 

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf


 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 11:36 am

PedoRoad, 

It was a jury trial.

It was never about you. It still isn't. 

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK"

Yeah...what could possibly go wrong.  Most if not all trials against Trump were blue districts. Again...what could possibly go wrong.    Just like the trial for Hillary's 2016 campaign lawyer. Biased judge and Hillary sympathetic jury.  

Even the lady jury foreman gave it all away when she said, "Our country has too many important issues to find someone guilty of lying to the FBI.  A jury is instructed to make a decision ONLY based on evidence presented in the trial.

Total Bias all around on yer side Bv.    
 

roadkill » 13 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm

"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK"

Yeah...what could possibly go wrong.  Most if not all trials against Trump were blue districts. Again...what could possibly go wrong.    Just like the trial for Hillary's 2016 campaign lawyer. Biased judge and Hillary sympathetic jury.  

Even the lady jury foreman gave it all away when she said, "Our country has too many important issues to find someone guilty of lying to the FBI.  A jury is instructed to make a decision ONLY based on evidence presented in the trial.

Total Bias all around on yer side Bv.

Read the entire thing, you dumb ****....

There'll be a quiz.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 2:39 pm

roadkill » 13 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm

"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK"

Yeah...what could possibly go wrong.  Most if not all trials against Trump were blue districts. Again...what could possibly go wrong.    Just like the trial for Hillary's 2016 campaign lawyer. Biased judge and Hillary sympathetic jury.  

Even the lady jury foreman gave it all away when she said, "Our country has too many important issues to find someone guilty of lying to the FBI.  A jury is instructed to make a decision ONLY based on evidence presented in the trial.

Total Bias all around on yer side Bv.

Read the entire thing, you dumb ****....

There'll be a quiz.
 

 

Looks like you are advancing from Meltdown Mary to Nuclear Nancy.  Not a good day for you.  What a man would do is copy and pasted the portion you feel he missed.

But, most of here you are not a man.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 11:36 am

PedoRoad, 

It was a jury trial.

It was never about you. It still isn't. 

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

Your lies and brainwashedness (I declare this a real word)   have always made it about Trump AND his supporters.    

Yer party Bv...



By golly...I'm giving that one a gold medal.      

  
 

MR-7 » 12 Jun 2025, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2025, 5:54 am

Yes, he voted against TRUMP knowing the 2 other candidates were/are
Does a bear **** in the woods
Yes, and a TROLL too
Well, he does support BV, Johnny You, and other groomers
I know he is BIGLY
Yes, and he will hold one in his mouth too
Maybe

There's no phooking who gives a shyt answer to the poll?  Mr Kelly can poop where ever he wants to.  Your J6 cop beating heroes smeared some on the walls of The Capitol;.

You ain't gonna like the 2026 Mid Terms Mr 7 was 13..

Man you need to learn some Optics.   I have seen phallic mushrooms with longer focal lengths than you..

Mehhhhh   Errrhhhhh ahhhahahh Tatata

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_50-gOeBilc

 
 

JohnnyYou » 13 Jun 2025, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 3:23 pm

There's no phooking who gives a shyt answer to the poll?  Mr Kelly can poop where ever he wants to.  Your J6 cop beating heroes smeared some on the walls of The Capitol;.

You ain't gonna like the 2026 Mid Terms Mr 7 was 13..

Man you need to learn some Optics.   I have seen phallic mushrooms with longer focal lengths than you..

Mehhhhh   Errrhhhhh ahhhahahh Tatata

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_50-gOeBilc

Are you saying he is not a child groomer like you. YES or NO will suffice.
 

JohnnyYou » 13 Jun 2025, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 3:23 pm

There's no phooking who gives a shyt answer to the poll?  Mr Kelly can poop where ever he wants to. 

This is why your failed party lost. You don't care about the kids. 
 

JohnnyYou » 13 Jun 2025, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 3:23 pm

There's no phooking who gives a shyt answer to the poll?  

But...if you don't give a phooking shyt...why would you answer?

MR-7 » 13 Jun 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 3:36 pm

This is why your failed party lost. You don't care about the kids.

Neither do you Mr Drill Baby Drill.

The kids gotta face a climate change like eggs on drugs frying in a pan. Not to mention 8.1 Billion to 12 Billion served daily in 20 years

The fuel cycle leads to hot shyt..  Glad I am in cooling..  Maybe I can help..
 
The kids are allright for the most part. I am sure the Drag Queen Bullshyt and the litter box is hard.


Your only solution is "Lock 'Em Up"
 

MR-7 » 13 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm

But...if you don't give a phooking shyt...why would you answer?

I don't remember giving one.. Maybe you have tracking on that device. It is possible in extreme inebriation I shyt on your poll. Did you lay that turd on @murdock  s face?

https://youtu.be/An8zOrbqwn0?si=oH0SklAyBWmCjwpt
 
 

JohnnyYou » 13 Jun 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 3:48 pm

I don't remember giving one.. Maybe you have tracking on that device. It is possible in extreme inebriation I shyt on your poll. Did you lay that turd on @murdock  s face?

https://youtu.be/An8zOrbqwn0?si=oH0SklAyBWmCjwpt

No, your mother did as I licked her ******, as nasty as it was!

JohnnyYou » 13 Jun 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 3:48 pm

I don't remember giving one.. Maybe you have tracking on that device. It is possible in extreme inebriation I shyt on your poll. Did you lay that turd on @murdock  s face?


 

That Mexican space funk....is some absolute junk.
 

 

Johnny you ***, suck my dick with your mother's asshole.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2025, 11:36 am

PedoRoad, 

It was a jury trial.

It was never about you. It still isn't. 

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

Oh wait!! So it was a JURY TRIAL and the JURY had the FINAL SAY, right??

That's why Trump is NOT A RAPIST, DICKSUCK!!

By YOUR OWN STANDARDS!!

Damn, boy, you really SUCK AT THIS!! Forgetting what "Standards" you have set for everyone so that YOU DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW THEM!!

NO RAPE WAS FOUND BY A JURY!! Want to see the VERDICT FORM AGAIN??

                 

*Beekeeper » 14 Jun 2025, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2025, 4:38 am

Oh wait!! So it was a JURY TRIAL and the JURY had the FINAL SAY, right??

That's why Trump is NOT A RAPIST, DICKSUCK!!

By YOUR OWN STANDARDS!!

Damn, boy, you really SUCK AT THIS!! Forgetting what "Standards" you have set for everyone so that YOU DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW THEM!!

NO RAPE WAS FOUND BY A JURY!! Want to see the VERDICT FORM AGAIN??

               

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. 

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2025, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2025, 6:47 am

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. 

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that

How does one become a serial rape victim?

What's the number up to date?
 

RebelGator » 14 Jun 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2025, 6:50 am

How does one become a serial rape victim?

What's the number up to date?

https://youtu.be/0E4GnMcSycU?si=5owsN8dgeRhpXJu0