Coozeleh, please..DeezerShoove » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Thanks for proving my point.
It's better than arguing with your 2 year old self:
ME! ME! ME! NO! NO! NO!
You never provided us with the evidence you claim exists in the E. Jean Crackpot trial.
PedoRoad,roadkill » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You never provided us with the evidence you claim exists in the E. Jean Crackpot trial.
I think it's because you know the evidence never existed. It was nothing more than a corrupt proceeding with kangaroos at ever turn.![]()
Bv was the moderator for those proceedings...and he trusted those involved...especially the judge. lol
"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK"Blackvegetable » Today, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ PedoRoad,
It was a jury trial.
It was never about you. It still isn't.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf
Read the entire thing, you dumb ****....roadkill » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK"
Yeah...what could possibly go wrong. Most if not all trials against Trump were blue districts. Again...what could possibly go wrong. Just like the trial for Hillary's 2016 campaign lawyer. Biased judge and Hillary sympathetic jury.
Even the lady jury foreman gave it all away when she said, "Our country has too many important issues to find someone guilty of lying to the FBI. A jury is instructed to make a decision ONLY based on evidence presented in the trial.
Total Bias all around on yer side Bv.
Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Read the entire thing, you dumb ****....roadkill » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK"
Yeah...what could possibly go wrong. Most if not all trials against Trump were blue districts. Again...what could possibly go wrong. Just like the trial for Hillary's 2016 campaign lawyer. Biased judge and Hillary sympathetic jury.
Even the lady jury foreman gave it all away when she said, "Our country has too many important issues to find someone guilty of lying to the FBI. A jury is instructed to make a decision ONLY based on evidence presented in the trial.
Total Bias all around on yer side Bv.
There'll be a quiz.
Your lies and brainwashedness (I declare this a real word)Blackvegetable » Today, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ PedoRoad,
It was a jury trial.
It was never about you. It still isn't.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf
There's no phooking who gives a shyt answer to the poll? Mr Kelly can poop where ever he wants to. Your J6 cop beating heroes smeared some on the walls of The Capitol;.MR-7 » Yesterday, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, he voted against TRUMP knowing the 2 other candidates were/are
Does a bear **** in the woods
Yes, and a TROLL too
Well, he does support BV, Johnny You, and other groomers
I know he is BIGLY
Yes, and he will hold one in his mouth too
Maybe
Are you saying he is not a child groomer like you. YES or NO will suffice.JohnnyYou » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There's no phooking who gives a shyt answer to the poll? Mr Kelly can poop where ever he wants to. Your J6 cop beating heroes smeared some on the walls of The Capitol;.
You ain't gonna like the 2026 Mid Terms Mr 7 was 13..
Man you need to learn some Optics. I have seen phallic mushrooms with longer focal lengths than you..
Mehhhhh Errrhhhhh ahhhahahh Tatata
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_50-gOeBilc
This is why your failed party lost. You don't care about the kids.JohnnyYou » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There's no phooking who gives a shyt answer to the poll? Mr Kelly can poop where ever he wants to.
But...if you don't give a phooking shyt...why would you answer?
Neither do you Mr Drill Baby Drill.
I don't remember giving one.. Maybe you have tracking on that device. It is possible in extreme inebriation I shyt on your poll. Did you lay that turd on @murdock s face?
JohnnyYou » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I don't remember giving one.. Maybe you have tracking on that device. It is possible in extreme inebriation I shyt on your poll. Did you lay that turd on @murdock s face?
https://youtu.be/An8zOrbqwn0?si=oH0SklAyBWmCjwpt
That Mexican space funk....is some absolute junk.JohnnyYou » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I don't remember giving one.. Maybe you have tracking on that device. It is possible in extreme inebriation I shyt on your poll. Did you lay that turd on @murdock s face?
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ PedoRoad,
It was a jury trial.
It was never about you. It still isn't.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.*Beekeeper » Today, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑ Oh wait!! So it was a JURY TRIAL and the JURY had the FINAL SAY, right??
That's why Trump is NOT A RAPIST, DICKSUCK!!
By YOUR OWN STANDARDS!!
Damn, boy, you really SUCK AT THIS!! Forgetting what "Standards" you have set for everyone so that YOU DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW THEM!!
NO RAPE WAS FOUND BY A JURY!! Want to see the VERDICT FORM AGAIN??
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does one become a serial rape victim?Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that
https://youtu.be/0E4GnMcSycU?si=5owsN8dgeRhpXJu0RebelGator » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How does one become a serial rape victim?
What's the number up to date?