Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

No...it appears to be the consensus of those who know about these things...

Skans » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

I beg your pardon, Big Boy.  Remember your OP?  "CAN ANY OF YOU MAGAT CRETINS REMEMBER WHY YOUR INFLUENCERS TOLD YOU TO HATE ON JIMMY CARTER"?

You ask why we "HATE" on Jimmy Carter and then claim "it isn't about your **** feelings, Skans"?  @ConservativeWave, @MR-7  , @Mrkelly  , @Cannonpointer  @Buffalo  @GHETTO BLASTER  @Deezer Shoove  , @ROG62  , @ *Huey, @PhiloBeddo  , @RebelGator  @roadkil, @*Beekeeper , @jerra b   - - - is it just me, or is this just more completely disingenuous and hypocritical gaslighting by Blackvegetable?

Cedar » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

If that were the consensus, Kneepad Kameltoe would be in the White House.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Keep proving my point.  I assure you remember this:

He is also a control freak.  Many of his post are demanding answers and diverting to what he wants to talk about.

This little exercise is not the consequence of your recent redrubbing In Re: Colt AR-15,  is it?

 

 

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I accept your surrender:

BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828

Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Skans » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

This is just more of Blackvegetable's completely disingenuous and hypocritical attempt at gaslighting.  Are the rest of you seeing this?

No....it is MEASURABLE and thus VERIFIABLE and COMPARABLE.

Your narrativy **** is akin to associating Grifty's 1st term with its catastrophic effect on US longevity stats...which you never hear anyone do.

 
 

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I accept your surrender:

BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828

Debunked...

Now, you wanna see "Surrender"?

*Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm

Take the L.

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models


 

*Huey » Today, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:34 am

*Huey » Yesterday, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:12 pm

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:33 pm

Take the L.

Hey ******, you say something about running.  Get the **** out here.

*Huey » 01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2024, 12:54 pm

I will take the L when you do the following:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And the civilian models:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

Here is the challenge again:

Now, to end this.  Using the link I gave you years ago and you have misunderstood ever since, do the following.  If you answer correctly, showing you are wrong,  I will take Monday thru Friday off.  If you prove me wrong, I will take a month off.

1.  Post what list the AR 15 semi automatic sports rifle is listed in.  Military or civilian.

2.  Post the year range that the AR 15 Semi Auto sports rifle was standard issue in the military to infantryman.

If you answer honestly both questions I will take the 5 days off. If you show the dates the Sporter was standard issue for the military and that t is on the military list I will take the Month of Sep off.

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:14 pm

*Huey » Yesterday, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:12 pm

Hey ******, you say something about running.  Get the **** out here.

A) I've already done it

B) You won't even tell me what "your" citation is about.

You run from all questions.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:21 pm

*Huey » Yesterday, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:58 pm

I did .  You said you already answered it honestly.  If you answered it honestly your must agree that:

1.  The Colt Sporter is not on the military list because it was not designed for combat.

2.  The Colt Sporter is not on the civilian list because it was designed for civilians.

Those are the only two honest answers.  You **** lost ****.  

Do not bother me any more with this bullshti.  Bumping this post will be my response. 

Good Night ****** Who Runs Too Far.

What a **** loser.

1) ****.

2) ****

I gave the honest answers.

If you can find a lie in my words, show me.
.if not, it's time to go back to the point of the article.

That was easy!  You lied one way or the other.

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

 

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

It IS the consensus..

Nod.

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

 

Does the article to which you make repeated references begin as follows?


This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:02 am

Skans » Today, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:59 am

I have the details correct. My proof of this is that this is your topic to which I've responded, and you nave no refutation whatsoever to what I've stated about Carter. The reason you've heard what I've said many times over the years, to the point you think its "cliche" is because it is actually true. Jimmy Carter was a terrible president. He made bad decisions.  He lacked focus on important problems facing Americans at that time.  He couldn't stop being an ideologue to address Americans' concerns, and just wanted to shove his wrong-way thinking down everyone's throats.  

Carter was yet another failed Democrat President.  Worse than Clinton.  Not as bad as Obama, or Biden - the worst of the four.

It isn't about your **** feelings, Skans....they are unreliable because you are susceptible and not very bright.

For example, can you tell me anything about GDP and/or Employment....you know, the things you've ignored while voting for the 2 worst presidents of the modern era.

 

*Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Are you still doing with that biased egghead survey?

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

*Huey » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

Are you still doing with that biased egghead survey?

Answer the question, little runny, and I'll tell you.

 

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I answered the OPs questions.

For example, can you tell me anything about GDP and/or Employment.

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I answered the OPs questions.

How about the one you've been running from for much of the morning

For example, can you tell me anything about GDP and/or Employment.

*Huey » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

This is a diversion because I nailed your point and you ran.  

*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I wasn't part of that discussion have not commented on Carter.  All I posted was what Remember from the eyes of a preteen thru the age of 15.

I was never asked it and said it about so I am not obliged to answer.

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

*Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

I wasn't part of that discussion have not commented on Carter.  All I posted was what Remember from the eyes of a preteen thru the age of 15.

I was never asked it and said it about so I am not obliged to answer.

******,

Another Very Special Rule of Engagement?

Post it.
 

 

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

*Huey » 46 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

46 minutes ago

This is a diversion because I nailed your point and you ran.  

That is impossible. 

Either you have a source, or you don't. 

Does your source begin as described, SurrenderREMF?

 

MR-7 » Today, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:43 am

jerrab and kelly have bv's back

*Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

No, common sense.  If I am not participating in a conversation, made no comments on the basis of your question, you will have to explain how I am supposed to know I obliged to answer it when you did not ask me.

Wrong thread.  You always run from the evidence.