Try coherence.ROG62 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ok, brown, here's the part which makes my statement TRUE, what were we told?
so **** gd'damned stupid...
ROG62 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Your heroes, brown...btw, Jessie is boringly monotone and I voted for Trump on policy vs personality...
:rofl: :die: :rofl:I voted for Trump on policy vs personality...
brown, what's your **** point?Blackvegetable » Today, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑ Here, Idiots...
https://youtu.be/29oya56b1g0?si=lr5p06iMZ-bHXmfq
and you're the **** Master Moron...
LMAO!Blackvegetable » Today, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ROG62 » Today, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ Your heroes, brown...btw, Jessie is boringly monotone and I voted for Trump on policy vs personality...
I voted for Trump on policy vs personality...![]()
![]()
![]()
JuCo,
You're a **** rube.
*Huey » 40 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ LMAO!
You're the idiot who was going to vote for a vegetable.
https://youtu.be/0vpIF65ISZU?si=F1NVRvuIYVfKL0w4
You have no room to laugh at the choices of others, lemming.
That was your choice, because you were told to voted for hi,Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑*Huey » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ LMAO!
You're the idiot who was going to vote for a vegetable.
https://youtu.be/0vpIF65ISZU?si=F1NVRvuIYVfKL0w4
You have no room to laugh at the choices of others, lemming.
Let's see.
How many off Biden's appointees called him a "moron"?
Focus on answering the question.
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Focus on answering the question.
It will reduce these incidences of incoherence...
Runny,*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I no longer play the askholio game. If you have to something to say man up and say it.. Anything short of that shows your father was right that you are not much of a man.
Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Runny,*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I no longer play the askholio game. If you have to something to say man up and say it.. Anything short of that shows your father was right that you are not much of a man.
You've ALWAYS been a coward..
You have nothing to withhold.
You're spamming mine, Cretin.*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Apparently you have nothing to say except ****. No need for you to spam my inbox.
Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑You're spamming mine, Cretin.*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Apparently you have nothing to say except ****. No need for you to spam my inbox.
Talking **** you don't have the petit pois to define.
Either A, B, C, or D.
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Either A, B, C, or D.
Let me break this down for you
To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image
I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him.
@Blackvegetable I will never let you live this gem down.
try **** off...
I wasn't told anything, brown...try again...**** moron...Blackvegetable » Today, 5:32 am » wrote: ↑ No, JuCo..
You were supposed to try to recall what you were told.
Of course, you're morons...