Liberal Forum

*Huey » 15 Jun 2025, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2025, 4:39 pm

Yes Bitch, it was unprovoked.  You and yours are defending criminals who rape, **** children and human traffic.  Bitch, if you feel this strongly about it carry your *** to one of the ore violent riots and put your **** money where your mouth is, bitch.

I put my money where my mouth is for years, as did MR-7.  All bitches like you have done is run your **** cocksucking mouths.

Detain sex criminals, human traffickers, murderers, pedophiles, and human traffickers.  Bitches lie you are **** idiots.

Carry your fat liberal do nothing *** to one of these protests, bitch, and get back to me.

trump himself said after ordering raids on farms that may be that was a mistake.

show one person who was arrested last weekend who was a rapist etc.

name and history.

jerrab » 16 Jun 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 11:43 am

trump himself said after ordering raids on farms that may be that was a mistake.

show one person who was arrested last weekend who was a rapist etc.

name and history.

I hope every crime committed by those here ILLEGALLY, happens to those who are against TRUMP, from this moment on.   
 

jerrab » 15 Jun 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2025, 3:51 pm

you served 26 years to destroy the constitution and appoint trump king,

I served from 1980 to 2006 you **** disgraceful ****. You just went on my FOE list. I will not read any more of your TRIFE. I only wish I had the power to have others do the same. 

 
 

MR-7 » 16 Jun 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:03 pm

I served from 1980 to 2006 you **** disgraceful ****. You just went on my FOE list. I will not read any more of your TRIFE. I only wish I had the power to have others do the same. 

what are you complaining about? thanks to your efforts trump is now king. after over 250 years america finally has a king.

MR-7 » 16 Jun 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:03 pm

I served from 1980 to 2006 you **** disgraceful ****. You just went on my FOE list. I will not read any more of your TRIFE. I only wish I had the power to have others do the same. 

• Supreme Court's Ruling: The Supreme Court recently ruled on Trump's immunity claim in Trump v. United States. The court concluded that a former president has absolute immunity for actions within their "exclusive sphere of constitutional authority" and presumptive immunity for other "official actions". The court's decision was seen by some, including Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her dissent, as potentially creating a "law-free zone around the President," effectively placing them above the law and contrasting with the Founders' intention to the law. 

jerra » wrote:

01 Feb 1970, 5:30 pm

MR-7 » 16 Jun 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:03 pm

I served from 1980 to 2006 you **** disgraceful ****. You just went on my FOE list. I will not read any more of your TRIFE. I only wish I had the power to have others do the same. 

• Supreme Court's Ruling: The Supreme Court recently ruled on Trump's immunity claim in Trump v. United States. The court concluded that a former president has absolute immunity for actions within their "exclusive sphere of constitutional authority" and presumptive immunity for other "official actions". The court's decision was seen by some, including Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her dissent, as potentially creating a "law-free zone around the President," effectively placing them above the law and contrasting with the Founders' intention to the law. 

"exclusive sphere of constitutional authority" and presumptive immunity for other "official actions"

Since you obviously fail to understand that means ANY President when operating within the constitution in an official manner is immune for those decisions.

It doesn't mean he can order a hit on a citizen's, shoot someone on 5th Ave, falsify personal financial statements or tax returns, etc.

jerrab » 15 Jun 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2025, 3:51 pm

you served 26 years to destroy the constitution and appoint trump king,

are you on crack?
 

ROG62 » 16 Jun 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:57 pm

are you on crack?

do you think trump should be immune and be  able to commit crimes without prosecution like a king?

yes or no. 

*Huey » 16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm

Since you obviously fail to understand that means ANY President when operating within the constitution in an official manner is immune for those decisions.

It doesn't mean he can order a hit on a citizen's, shoot someone on 5th Ave, falsify personal financial statements or tax returns, etc.

if he said it was an executive action he could the way the law is now.

jerra » wrote:

01 Feb 1970, 5:31 pm

ROG62 » 16 Jun 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:57 pm

are you on crack?

do you think trump should be immune and be  able to commit crimes without prosecution like a king?

yes or no. 

 

He's not.

 

 

ROG62 » 16 Jun 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:57 pm

jerrab » 15 Jun 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2025, 3:51 pm

you served 26 years to destroy the constitution and appoint trump king,

are you on crack?
 

 

I am thinking more of trailer park meth head.

jerra » wrote:

01 Feb 1970, 5:31 pm

*Huey » 16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm

Since you obviously fail to understand that means ANY President when operating within the constitution in an official manner is immune for those decisions.

It doesn't mean he can order a hit on a citizen's, shoot someone on 5th Ave, falsify personal financial statements or tax returns, etc.

if he said it was an executive action he could the way the law is now.

 

Executive actions and orders have to fall within the constitution and the law.  

jerrab » 16 Jun 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 11:40 am

the supreme court deemed trump is above the law.

The Supreme Court exists to make decisions 

MR-7 » 15 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm

I served 26 years for you to have the right to express your opinions, no matter how **** stupid they are. I earned my RIGHT, BITCH! 
 

I have been paying taxes since 16 years old. Nobody in government represents actual evolving in plain sight.

Just building better artificial tomorrows, noon to midnight, played out, midnight to noon, dawn to dusk every 23 hours 56 minutes, and 4 seconds each of the 365.2422 days a revolution around the star every rotation forward since the inception of original 16 great great grandparent generation arrived and the arrival of each great great grandchild born each rotation not counted until birth.

Guess where the scientific factual missing ancestral link to current global population exists in plain sight? Your mind never accepting your personal chromosomes are eternally separated by your personal heart beating now.

As for your personal brain since conception.

MR-7 » 15 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2025, 3:43 pm

I served 26 years for you to have the right to express your opinions, no matter how **** stupid they are. I earned my RIGHT, BITCH!

Thank you for your service!

*Huey » 16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm

Since you obviously fail to understand that means ANY President when operating within the constitution in an official manner is immune for those decisions.

It doesn't mean he can order a hit on a citizen's, shoot someone on 5th Ave, falsify personal financial statements or tax returns, etc.

nixon did not get absolute privelege----------------------

. And when a subpoena issued to President Richard Nixon, the Court rejected his claim of “absolute privilege.”

*Huey » 16 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm

Executive actions and orders have to fall within the constitution and the law.

trump says what ever he does is a executive action.

jerra » wrote:

01 Feb 1970, 5:31 pm

*Huey » 16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm

Since you obviously fail to understand that means ANY President when operating within the constitution in an official manner is immune for those decisions.

It doesn't mean he can order a hit on a citizen's, shoot someone on 5th Ave, falsify personal financial statements or tax returns, etc.

nixon did not get absolute privelege----------------------

. And when a subpoena issued to President Richard Nixon, the Court rejected his claim of “absolute privilege.”

 

Dum Dum, do you understand my comments?  Thank you for proving my point.  What a **** idiot.

*Huey » 16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 12:34 pm

Since you obviously fail to understand that means ANY President when operating within the constitution in an official manner is immune for those decisions.

It doesn't mean he can order a hit on a citizen's, shoot someone on 5th Ave, falsify personal financial statements or tax returns, etc.

https://millercenter.org/supreme-courts ... n-immunity
Supreme Court’s Trump ruling would have given Nixon immunity

Gerald Ford knew Richard Nixon could be prosecuted for crimes he committed as president. That was simply a fact, when President Ford gave his predecessor “a full, free, and absolute pardon” 50 years ago this week.Former presidents did not enjoy broad immunity from criminal prosecution until July 1, 2024, when six members of the Supreme Court created that privilege in Trump v. United States.
 
 

BuckNaked » 16 Jun 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2025, 2:11 pm

Thank you for your service!

No need to. It was an HONOR.   Thank you for being a PATRIOTIC AMERICAN.