Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 18 Jun 2025, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2025, 8:43 pm

Where's cockamamie.

It's in **** - on its knees, sucking dick.

Good luck with your *** team.

That old man is sucking dick alright. Not in Israel.  He's sucking Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran's holy cocksickle.  'ol Khamenie is down on his pray rug, bent over with his *** in the air getting ready for Reza to brutalize his *** before he sends him to Hell to get fornicated by 72 horny virgin billy goats. 
 

Cannonpointer » 18 Jun 2025, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2025, 8:43 pm

Where's cockamamie.

It's in **** - on its knees, sucking dick.

Good luck with your *** team.

 *** *** everywhere
Israel, Iran, India and  Qatar 
California's got the most of them
Man-butts covered in dirty cum
Good for spreading deadly disease
'n electing commies who will appease
Tomorrow there will be a ***-vax
Cannonponter shouts NO, I ain't ax
da Jews fo no *** Vax!  F-you.  That's the best I could do, I'm tired and going to sleep now. 
 

Skans » 18 Jun 2025, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2025, 8:48 pm

That old man is sucking dick alright. Not in Israel.  He's sucking Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran's holy cocksickle.  'ol Khamenie is down on his pray rug, bent over with his *** in the air getting ready for Reza to brutalize his *** before he sends him to Hell to get fornicated by 72 horny virgin billy goats.

Yeah, you're making a lot of sense, child. 

It seems you're embarrassed to be backing ***, so you're pointing an effeminate finger at the real men who make you feel inferior. 

Keep rah rah-ing for that rainbow flag, child. 
 
 

Skans » 18 Jun 2025, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2025, 9:19 pm

*** *** everywhere
Israel, Iran, India and  Qatar 
California's got the most of them
Man-butts covered in dirty cum
Good for spreading deadly disease
'n electing commies who will appease
Tomorrow there will be a ***-vax
Cannonponter shouts NO, I ain't ax
da Jews fo no *** Vax!  F-you.  That's the best I could do, I'm tired and going to sleep now. 

Good luck rooting for your *** team, kid. Keep cheering for the pride flag and the flaggots who wave it. 

Skans » 18 Jun 2025, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2025, 8:35 pm

Isn't that a Soylent Green disk its nibbling on?

LOL...could very well be...

Skans » 18 Jun 2025, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2025, 9:19 pm

*** *** everywhere
Israel, Iran, India and  Qatar 
California's got the most of them
Man-butts covered in dirty cum
Good for spreading deadly disease
'n electing commies who will appease
Tomorrow there will be a ***-vax
Cannonponter shouts NO, I ain't ax
da Jews fo no *** Vax!  F-you.  That's the best I could do, I'm tired and going to sleep now. 

Here's the difference between me and you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smemFVe0l5E

You are with the homosexual guy - whats-his-name. "Lindsey."

I'm with Tucker.

That is it - that is all of it. 

And you think that you're a "conservative." And you're not. You are essentially a progressive, with some red line disagreements with your fellow progressives. Like a Ruby-Throated Cockswallow or a Satin-Stained Dimwarbler or a **** Megalodummiac - the same bird, just a feather off. 

 
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 12:42 pm

Here's the difference between me and you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smemFVe0l5E

You are with the homosexual guy - whats-his-name. "Lindsey."

I'm with Tucker.

That is it - that is all of it. 

And you think that you're a "conservative." And you're not. You are essentially a progressive, with some red line disagreements with your fellow progressives. Like a Ruby-Throated Cockswallow or a Satin-Stained Dimwarbler or a **** Megalodummiac - the same bird, just a feather off.

I like Lindsey Graham.  I like Tucker Carlson. I particularly like Ted Cruz.  I hope Cruz runs for president again. I agree with all three of them most of the time.  The differences between the views of those three is minutia. Particularly compared to the likes of Adam Schiff, AOC, Hakeem Jeffries, etc. 

You, on the other hand, worship the likes of FDR. I have a hard time with that.  Democrat.  New Deal Democrat.  Socialist, actually.  And, a weak-*** ****** married to a bull dyke (skans shudders). 
 

Skans » 20 Jun 2025, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 12:54 pm

I like Lindsey Graham.  I like Tucker Carlson. I particularly like Ted Cruz.  I hope Cruz runs for president again. I agree with all three of them most of the time.  The differences between the views of those three is minutia. Particularly compared to the likes of Adam Schiff, AOC, Hakeem Jeffries, etc. 

You, on the other hand, worship the likes of FDR. I have a hard time with that.  Democrat.  New Deal Democrat.  Socialist, actually.  And, a weak-*** ****** married to a bull dyke (skans shudders).

Sorry wrong queer. I meant to say teddie cruz. But lindsey graham is dick-by-jowl with teddie cruz.

You say you like both. Aren't you special. 

They are in findamental disagreement. Which means you're fun and mental. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 1:02 pm

Sorry wrong queer. I meant to say teddie cruz. But lindsey graham is dick-by-jowl with teddie cruz.

You say you like both. Aren't you special. 

They are in findamental disagreement. Which means you're fun and mental.

Did you even listen to the clip you posted?  While I didn't listen to all of it, I found it interesting how many times Carlson said "I agree".  These two agree on almost everything. What they disagree on, while both express their differences somewhat passionately, is relatively small. 

What I also noticed was that Tucker and Ted could have a good, solid debate with each other yet remain respectful. We're human.  No human completely agrees with another human on everything. Obviously Conservatives (I consider both Ted and Tucker Conservatives) are going to have points they disagree on.  

CP, you really should watch that clip again and take note of 1) how they debate and discuss and 2) how much they actually agree on. 
 

Skans » 20 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm

Did you even listen to the clip you posted?  While I didn't listen to all of it, I found it interesting how many times Carlson said "I agree".  These two agree on almost everything. What they disagree on, while both express their differences somewhat passionately, is relatively small.

Assuming you are stupid enough to consider starting WWIII relatively small. And you are.

Skans » 20 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm

What I also noticed was that Tucker and Ted could have a good, solid debate with each other yet remain respectful. We're human.  No human completely agrees with another human on everything. Obviously Conservatives (I consider both Ted and Tucker Conservatives) are going to have points they disagree on.  

CP, you really should watch that clip again and take note of 1) how they debate and discuss and 2) how much they actually agree on.

I would rather point out that one of them thinks invading a sovereign nation is justified - making him a war criminal, - and the other is a human being.

Teddie is a piece of **** who once sponsored a bill to TAKE AWAY THE CITIZENSHIP of "suspected" terrorists. If you were capable of deep thought, that would horrify you and put you at eternal enmity with that piece of ****. Instead, you're his boy. You think he's a "conservative." But then, you think you're one. And you're wrong on both counts.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm

Assuming you are stupid enough to consider starting WWIII relatively small. And you are.

I would rather point out that one of them thinks invading a sovereign nation is justified - making him a war criminal, - and the other is a human being.

Teddie is a piece of **** who once sponsored a bill to TAKE AWAY THE CITIZENSHIP of "suspected" terrorists. If you were capable of deep thought, that would horrify you and put you at eternal enmity with thgat piece of ****. Instead, you're his boy. You think he's a "conservative." But then, you think you're one. And you're wrong on both counts.

 

Who's going to jump to Iran's defense?  China?  No.  Russia?  No.  North Korea?  Maybe - that would just be a bonus, because its high time that we deal with that fat little Fk too!!!

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:33 pm

Assuming you are stupid enough to consider starting WWIII relatively small. And you are.

I would rather point out that one of them thinks invading a sovereign nation is justified - making him a war criminal, - and the other is a human being.

Teddie is a piece of **** who once sponsored a bill to TAKE AWAY THE CITIZENSHIP of "suspected" terrorists. If you were capable of deep thought, that would horrify you and put you at eternal enmity with thgat piece of ****. Instead, you're his boy. You think he's a "conservative." But then, you think you're one. And you're wrong on both counts.

Hey, I'll admit, I've been a Ted Cruz Republican for a long time. While I like Trump and think he's doing a good job, I would have been quite fine with Cruz. Tucker Carlson would not be my pick.  First, I can't stand his feminine falsetto voice when he gets excited.  Second, he's really a bit of a ******.  I know, you think he's a courageous man, but you're wrong on that count.  I generally like the guy, but glad he's not a statesman (******) running this country.  
 

Skans » 20 Jun 2025, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:28 pm

Hey, I'll admit, I've been a Ted Cruz Republican for a long time. While I like Trump and think he's doing a good job, I would have been quite fine with Cruz. Tucker Carlson would not be my pick.  First, I can't stand his feminine falsetto voice when he gets excited.  Second, he's really a bit of a ******.  I know, you think he's a courageous man, but you're wrong on that count.  I generally like the guy, but glad he's not a statesman (******) running this country.

I certainly won't deny the effeminate falsetto, and I have never seen Tucker as anything but an entertaining talking head. I have not put him forward as a statesman. 

But that piece of **** teddie cruz is as sorry an excuse for a conservative as any that has slithered across the American political scene, and the fact that he represents you represents you. 
 
The piece of **** represents the nation of israel - not the state of Texas. You are a fifth columnist's fool.
 

Skans » 20 Jun 2025, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:23 pm

Who's going to jump to Iran's defense?  China?  No.  Russia?  No.  North Korea?  Maybe - that would just be a bonus, because its high time that we deal with that fat little Fk too!!!

Both Russia and China will AT A MINIMUM supply Iran with the weapons of war, dummy. 

The better question is who will supply the US with troops that aren't squabbling over cock. 
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 4:06 pm

Both Russia and China will AT A MINIMUM supply Iran with the weapons of war, dummy. 

The better question is who will supply the US with troops that aren't squabbling over cock.

Israel.  Let Israel commit its manpower to doing what IT wants done in Iran.  The US is not in any real danger from Iran, other than the assassination attempts. But, let Israel have the equipment to destroy Iran's nuke sites. I'm fine with that.  That works for me, and you, even though you can't add this up in your brain, sweetheart.  

I would love to not have to hear about Gaza, Hezbollah, Hamas, Israel, proxies, Houthis, Iran, Iraq or any other of these sand-sort-of-nations for the next 20 years.  
 

Skans » 20 Jun 2025, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 4:51 pm

Israel.  Let Israel commit its manpower to doing what IT wants done in Iran.  The US is not in any real danger from Iran, other than the assassination attempts. But, let Israel have the equipment to destroy Iran's nuke sites. I'm fine with that.  That works for me, and you, even though you can't add this up in your brain, sweetheart.  

I would love to not have to hear about Gaza, Hezbollah, Hamas, Israel, proxies, Houthis, Iran, Iraq or any other of these sand-sort-of-nations for the next 20 years.

The removal of israel would give you what you claim your heart desires. They are the common demon-ator. They are the **** stirring ****.
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2025, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 5:29 pm

The removal of israel would give you what you claim your heart desires. They are the common demon-ator. They are the **** stirring ****.

I think Israel should expand its borders to take southern Lebanon and all the so-called "palestinian" territories. Then, buy land somewhere in Egypt's vast desert with which to relocate all of the palestinians.
 

Skans » 21 Jun 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 10:23 am

I think

Gotta stop ya at the first lie, son. 

Skans » 17 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm

You better think this through.  If you bomb Uranium enrichment facilities, where there may be 70% weapons grade material, enough to build 9 nuclear weapons, what happens to that after the bomb goes off, Israel leaves and the US has moved on to having a space war with China?  I'll tell you what happens:

• Some terrorist cell with bulldozers and Geiger counters dig up that fissionable material.
• They sell it to Yemen, Burkina Fazo and a Mexican Drug cartel. 

Then, good luck trying to put that genie back in the bottle. 

This is Israel's war.  Israel need to put boots on the ground and recover that fissionable material  I don't mind the US supporting an operation like this with intel, equipment and ordnance.  But, its up to the Israelis to get the job done and get it done right.  It will be on THEM if they half-*** this and leave fissionable uranium laying around like Joe Biden left military equipment in Afghanistan.

Couple things you seem to be missing:

1. The drug cartels are run by the cia and the dea.

2. Israel has less than ten million people - and 72% are effeminate homosexuals. Iran has over 90million, and they don't allow their effeminate homosexuals in the military. So your pretense that israel is going to put boots on the ground - when we all know that you know that it's gonna be goy boots or no boots on the ground in Iran - is diingenuous. And that description is pretty **** generous. 
 

Skans » 17 Jun 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2025, 1:17 pm

Life is like a bunch of Russians. You never know which one isn't mafia.

Cops are like a box of chocolates.

They'll kill your dog.